Lies Lahousse

Prof. Lies Lahousse

Department Bioanalysis, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 December 2017 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FDFlorence Demenais
Florence Demenais
PMPatricia Margaritte-Jeannin
Patricia Margaritte-Jeannin
KBKathleen C Barnes
Kathleen C Barnes
WCWilliam Oc Cookson
William Oc Cookson
JAJanine Altmüller
Janine Altmüller
DNDan Nicolae
Dan Nicolae
We examined common variation in asthma risk by conducting a meta-analysis of worldwide asthma genome-wide association studies (23,948 asthma cases, 118,538 controls) of individuals from ethnically diverse populations. We identified five new asthma loci, found two new associations at two known asthma loci, established asthma associations at two loci previously implicated in the comorbidity of asthma plus hay fever, and confirmed nine known loci. Investigation of pleiotropy showed large overlaps in genetic variants with autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. The enrichment in enhancer marks at asthma risk loci, especially in immune cells, suggested a major role of these loci in the regulation of immunologically related mechanisms.

25 February 2019 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PSPhuwanat Sakornsakolpat
Phuwanat Sakornsakolpat
DPDmitry Prokopenko
Dmitry Prokopenko
MLMaxime Lamontagne
Maxime Lamontagne
NRNicola F. Reeve
Nicola F. Reeve
AGAnna L. Guyatt
Anna L. Guyatt
MCMichael H. Cho
Michael H. Cho

6 February 2017 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CICOPDGene Investigators
COPDGene Investigators
BHBrian D Hobbs
Brian D Hobbs
EIECLIPSE Investigators
ECLIPSE Investigators
LILifeLines Investigators
LifeLines Investigators
SGSPIROMICS Research Group
SPIROMICS Research Group
MCMichael H Cho
Michael H Cho

10 October 2019 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SWSara Wijnant
Sara Wijnant
EREmmely De Roos
Emmely De Roos
MKMaryam Kavousi
Maryam Kavousi
BSBruno H. Stricker
Bruno H. Stricker
NTNatalie Terzikhan
Natalie Terzikhan
GBGuy G. Brusselle
Guy G. Brusselle
Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) is a heterogeneous condition but its course and disease progression remain to be elucidated. We aimed to examine its prevalence, trajectories and prognosis in the general population.In the Rotterdam Study (population-based prospective cohort) we examined prevalence, trajectories and prognosis of subjects with normal spirometry (controls; forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥0.7, FEV1 ≥80%), PRISm (FEV1/FVC ≥0.7, FEV1 <80%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (FEV1/FVC <0.7) at two study visits. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for mortality (until December 30, 2018) were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, current smoking and pack-years.Of 5487 subjects (age 69.1±8.9 years; 7.1% PRISm), 1603 were re-examined after 4.5 years. Of the re-examined PRISm subjects, 15.7% transitioned to normal spirometry and 49.4% to COPD. Median lung function decline was highest in subjects with incident PRISm (FEV1−92.8 mL·year−1, interquartile range (IQR) −131.9– −65.8 mL·year−1; FVC −93.3 mL·year−1, IQR −159.8– −49.1 mL·year−1), but similar in persistent PRISm (FEV1−30.2 mL·year−1, IQR −67.9– −7.5 mL·year−1; FVC −20.1 mL·year−1, IQR −47.7–21.7 mL·year−1) and persistent controls (FEV1−39.6 mL·year−1, IQR −64.3–−12.7 mL·year−1; FVC −20.0 mL·year−1, IQR −55.4–18.8 mL·year−1). Of 5459 subjects with informed consent for follow-up, 692 (12.7%) died during 9.3 years (maximum) follow-up: 10.3% of controls, 18.7% of PRISm subjects and 20.8% of COPD subjects. Relative to controls, subjects with PRISm and COPD Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2–4 had increased all-cause mortality (PRISm: HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2–2.0; COPD GOLD 2–4: HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4–2.1) and cardiovascular mortality (PRISm: HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5–5.1; COPD 2–4: HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2–3.6). Mortality within <1 year was highest in PRISm, with patients often having cardiovascular comorbidities (heart failure or coronary heart disease; 70.0%).PRISm is associated with increased mortality and this population encompasses at least three distinct subsets: one that develops COPD during follow-up, a second with high cardiovascular burden and early mortality, and a third with persistent PRISm and normal age-related lung function decline.

5 March 2016 in European Journal of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NTNatalie Terzikhan
Natalie Terzikhan
KVKatia M. C. Verhamme
Katia M. C. Verhamme
AHAlbert Hofman
Albert Hofman
BSBruno H. Stricker
Bruno H. Stricker
GBGuy G. Brusselle
Guy G. Brusselle
LLLies Lahousse
Lies Lahousse
COPD is the third leading cause of death in the world and its global burden is predicted to increase further. Even though the prevalence of COPD is well studied, only few studies examined the incidence of COPD in a prospective and standardized manner. In a prospective population-based cohort study (Rotterdam Study) enrolling subjects aged ≥45, COPD was diagnosed based on a pre-bronchodilator obstructive spirometry (FEV1/FVC < 0.70). In absence of an interpretable spirometry within the Rotterdam Study, cases were defined as having COPD diagnosed by a physician on the basis of clinical presentation and obstructive lung function measured by the general practitioner or respiratory physician. Incidence rates were calculated by dividing the number of incident cases by the total number of person years of subjects at risk. In this cohort of 14,619 participants, 1993 subjects with COPD were identified of whom 689 as prevalent ones and 1304 cases as incident ones. The overall incidence rate (IR) of COPD was 8.9/1000 person-years (PY); 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 8.4–9.4. The IR was higher in males and in smokers. The proportion of female COPD participants without a history of smoking was 27.2 %, while this proportion was 7.3 % in males. The prevalence of COPD in the Rotterdam Study is 4.7 % and the overall incidence is approximately 9/1000 PY, with a higher incidence in males and in smokers. The proportion of never-smokers among female COPD cases is substantial.

13 November 2019 in European Respiratory Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBElizabeth Benz
Elizabeth Benz
KTKaterina Trajanoska
Katerina Trajanoska
LLLies Lahousse
Lies Lahousse
JSJosje D. Schoufour
Josje D. Schoufour
NTNatalie Terzikhan
Natalie Terzikhan
FRFernando Rivadeneira
Fernando Rivadeneira
COPD is associated with a progressive loss of muscle mass and function. However, there is an unmet need to define and standardise methods to estimate the prevalence of sarcopenia in COPD patients.We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of this extrapulmonary manifestation in COPD patients. We searched Embase, Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar for studies published up to January 17, 2019, assessing sarcopenia in COPD patients based on low muscle mass and decreased muscle function. Interventional studies,in vitroexperiments, protocols or reviews and meta-analyses were excluded. We estimated heterogeneity (I2) and assessed significance (Q) using a Chi-squared test for estimates obtained from random-effects models.4465 articles were initially identified. After removing the duplicates and applying the selection criteria, we reviewed 62 full-text articles. Finally, 10 articles (n=2565 COPD patients) were included in this systematic review and meta-analyses. Overall, the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with COPD was 21.6% (95% CI 14.6–30.9%, I2=94%), ranging from 8% in population-based to 21% in clinic-based studies, and 63% in COPD patients residing in nursing homes.Sarcopenia is frequently observed in COPD patients, with varying prevalence across population settings. Sarcopenia in COPD should be assessed using standardised tests and cut-off points from sarcopenia consensus criteria for clinical practice and international comparisons.