Adam Cross

Dr. Adam Cross

Centre for Mine Site Restoration, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 September 2018 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASArne Saatkamp
Arne Saatkamp
JCJennifer ANNE Cochrane
Jennifer ANNE Cochrane
LCLucy Commander
Lucy Commander
LGLydia K. Guja
Lydia K. Guja
BJBorja Jimenez‐Alfaro
Borja Jimenez‐Alfaro
JWJeffrey Walck
Jeffrey Walck
Summary: Trait‐based approaches have improved our understanding of plant evolution, community assembly and ecosystem functioning. A major challenge for the upcoming decades is to understand the functions and evolution of early life‐history traits, across levels of organization and ecological strategies. Although a variety of seed traits are critical for dispersal, persistence, germination timing and seedling establishment, only seed mass has been considered systematically. Here we suggest broadening the range of morphological, physiological and biochemical seed traits to add new understanding on plant niches, population dynamics and community assembly. The diversity of seed traits and functions provides an important challenge that will require international collaboration in three areas of research. First, we present a conceptual framework for a seed ecological spectrum that builds upon current understanding of plant niches. We then lay the foundation for a seed‐trait functional network, the establishment of which will underpin and facilitate trait‐based inferences. Finally, we anticipate novel insights and challenges associated with incorporating diverse seed traits into predictive evolutionary ecology, community ecology and applied ecology. If the community invests in standardized seed‐trait collection and the implementation of rigorous databases, major strides can be made at this exciting frontier of functional ecology.

27 March 2020 in Restoration Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JAJames Aronson
James Aronson
NGNeva Goodwin
Neva Goodwin
LOLaura Orlando
Laura Orlando
CECristina Eisenberg
Cristina Eisenberg
Adam CrossAdam Cross
Adam Cross

20 February 2020 in Restoration Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OKOlga A. Kildisheva
Olga A. Kildisheva
KDKingsley W. Dixon
Kingsley W. Dixon
FSFernando A. O. Silveira
Fernando A. O. Silveira
TCTed Chapman
Ted Chapman
ASAlice Di Sacco
Alice Di Sacco
Adam CrossAdam Cross
Adam Cross
From 50 to 90% of wild plant species worldwide produce seeds that are dormant upon maturity, with specific dormancy traits driven by species' occurrence geography, growth form, and genetic factors. While dormancy is a beneficial adaptation for intact natural systems, it can limit plant recruitment in restoration scenarios because seeds may take several seasons to lose dormancy and consequently show low or erratic germination. During this time, seed predation, weed competition, soil erosion, and seed viability loss can lead to plant re‐establishment failure. Understanding and considering seed dormancy and germination traits in restoration planning are thus critical to ensuring effective seed management and seed use efficiency. There are five known dormancy classes (physiological, physical, combinational, morphological, and morphophysiological), each requiring specific cues to alleviate dormancy and enable germination. The dormancy status of a seed can be determined through a series of simple steps that account for initial seed quality and assess germination across a range of environmental conditions. In this article, we outline the steps of the dormancy classification process and the various corresponding methodologies for ex situ dormancy alleviation. We also highlight the importance of record‐keeping and reporting of seed accession information (e.g. geographic coordinates of the seed collection location, cleaning and quality information, storage conditions, and dormancy testing data) to ensure that these factors are adequately considered in restoration planning.

1 February 2019 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SWSonglin Wu
Songlin Wu
YLYunjia Liu
Yunjia Liu
GSGordon Southam
Gordon Southam
LRLachlan Robertson
Lachlan Robertson
TCTsz Ho Chiu
Tsz Ho Chiu
LHLongbin Huang
Longbin Huang

23 September 2019 in Frontiers in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BMBenjamin Moreira-Grez
Benjamin Moreira-Grez
KTKang Tam
Kang Tam
Adam CrossAdam Cross
Adam Cross
Jean Wan Hong YONGJean Wan Hong YONG
Jean Wan Hong YONG
DKDeepak Kumaresan
Deepak Kumaresan
AWAndrew S. Whiteley
Andrew S. Whiteley
Biocrusts are aggregated crusts that exist on the soil surface of arid environments. They are complex microbial communities comprised of cyanobacteria, lichens, mosses, algae and fungi. Recently, biocrusts have gained significant attention due to their ubiquitous distribution and likely important ecological roles, including soil stabilization, soil moisture retention, carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) fixation, as well as microbial engineers for semi-arid ecosystem restoration. Here, we collected three co-occurring types of biocrust (Cyanobacterial crust, Crustose lichen, and Foliose lichen) and their underlying soil from arid zones within Western Australia. Bacterial microbiome composition was determined through 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to assess the extent of microbiome selection within the crusts versus underlying soil and biogeochemical measures performed to determine whether the crusts had significant impact upon the underlying soil for nutrient input. We determined that the bacterial communities of native biocrusts are distinct from those in their underlying soil, where dominant bacterial taxa differed according to crust morphologies. δ15N revealed that N-fixation appeared most evident in Foliose lichen crust (1.73 ± 1.04‰). Consequently, depending upon the crust type, biocrusts contained higher concentrations of organic C (2 to 50 times), total N (4 to 16 times) and available ammonium (2 to 4 times), though this enrichment did not extend to the soils underneath them. These findings demonstrate that biocrust communities are seemingly islands of biological activity in an arid landscape, uniquely different from their surrounding and underlying soil.

1 December 2017 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Adam CrossAdam Cross
Adam Cross
HLHans Lambers
Hans Lambers