Zhenzhu Wang

Prof. Dr. Zhenzhu Wang

Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Hefei, Anhui, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2002 in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGraeme L. Stephens
Graeme L. Stephens
DVDeborah G. Vane
Deborah G. Vane
RBRonald J. Boain
Ronald J. Boain
GMGerald G. Mace
Gerald G. Mace
KSKenneth Sassen
Kenneth Sassen
TTthe CloudSat Science Team
the CloudSat Science Team

27 April 2008 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGraeme L. Stephens
Graeme L. Stephens
DVDeborah G. Vane
Deborah G. Vane
STSimone Tanelli
Simone Tanelli
EIEastwood Im
Eastwood Im
SDStephen Durden
Stephen Durden
RMRojer Marchand
Rojer Marchand

27 April 2008 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKenneth Sassen
Kenneth Sassen
ZWZhenzhu Wang
Zhenzhu Wang
DLDong Liu
Dong Liu

13 January 2015 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PDP. J. DeMott
P. J. DeMott
APA. J. Prenni
A. J. Prenni
GMG. R. McMeeking
G. R. McMeeking
RSRyan Sullivan
Ryan Sullivan
MPM. D. Petters
M. D. Petters
SKS. M. Kreidenweis
S. M. Kreidenweis
Data from both laboratory studies and atmospheric measurements are used to develop an empirical parameterization for the immersion freezing activity of natural mineral dust particles. Measurements made with the Colorado State University (CSU) continuous flow diffusion chamber (CFDC) when processing mineral dust aerosols at a nominal 105% relative humidity with respect to water (RHw) are taken as a measure of the immersion freezing nucleation activity of particles. Ice active frozen fractions vs. temperature for dusts representative of Saharan and Asian desert sources were consistent with similar measurements in atmospheric dust plumes for a limited set of comparisons available. The parameterization developed follows the form of one suggested previously for atmospheric particles of non-specific composition in quantifying ice nucleating particle concentrations as functions of temperature and the total number concentration of particles larger than 0.5 μm diameter. Such an approach does not explicitly account for surface area and time dependencies for ice nucleation, but sufficiently encapsulates the activation properties for potential use in regional and global modeling simulations, and possible application in developing remote sensing retrievals for ice nucleating particles. A calibration factor is introduced to account for the apparent underestimate (by approximately 3, on average) of the immersion freezing fraction of mineral dust particles for CSU CFDC data processed at an RHw of 105% vs. maximum fractions active at higher RHw. Instrumental factors that affect activation behavior vs. RHw in CFDC instruments remain to be fully explored in future studies. Nevertheless, the use of this calibration factor is supported by comparison to ice activation data obtained for the same aerosols from Aerosol Interactions and Dynamics of the Atmosphere (AIDA) expansion chamber cloud parcel experiments. Further comparison of the new parameterization, including calibration correction, to predictions of the immersion freezing surface active site density parameterization for mineral dust particles, developed separately from AIDA experimental data alone, shows excellent agreement for data collected in a descent through a Saharan aerosol layer. These studies support the utility of laboratory measurements to obtain atmospherically relevant data on the ice nucleation properties of dust and other particle types, and suggest the suitability of considering all mineral dust as a single type of ice nucleating particle as a useful first-order approximation in numerical modeling investigations.

17 May 2009 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KPKerri A. Pratt
Kerri A. Pratt
PDPaul J. DeMott
Paul J. DeMott
JFJeffrey R. French
Jeffrey R. French
ZWZhenzhu Wang
Zhenzhu Wang
DWDouglas L. Westphal
Douglas L. Westphal
KPKimberly A. Prather
Kimberly A. Prather

1 November 2009 in Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YHYongxiang Hu
Yongxiang Hu
DWDavid Winker
David Winker
MVMark Vaughan
Mark Vaughan
BLBing Lin
Bing Lin
AOAli Omar
Ali Omar
RKRalph Kuehn
Ralph Kuehn
The current cloud thermodynamic phase discrimination by Cloud-Aerosol Lidar Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) is based on the depolarization of backscattered light measured by its lidar [Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP)]. It assumes that backscattered light from ice crystals is depolarizing, whereas water clouds, being spherical, result in minimal depolarization. However, because of the relationship between the CALIOP field of view (FOV) and the large distance between the satellite and clouds and because of the frequent presence of oriented ice crystals, there is often a weak correlation between measured depolarization and phase, which thereby creates significant uncertainties in the current CALIOP phase retrieval. For water clouds, the CALIOP-measured depolarization can be large because of multiple scattering, whereas horizontally oriented ice particles depolarize only weakly and behave similarly to water clouds. Because of the nonunique depolarization–cloud phase relationship, more constraints are necessary to uniquely determine cloud phase. Based on theoretical and modeling studies, an improved cloud phase determination algorithm has been developed. Instead of depending primarily on layer-integrated depolarization ratios, this algorithm differentiates cloud phases by using the spatial correlation of layer-integrated attenuated backscatter and layer-integrated particulate depolarization ratio. This approach includes a two-step process: 1) use of a simple two-dimensional threshold method to provide a preliminary identification of ice clouds containing randomly oriented particles, ice clouds with horizontally oriented particles, and possible water clouds and 2) application of a spatial coherence analysis technique to separate water clouds from ice clouds containing horizontally oriented ice particles. Other information, such as temperature, color ratio, and vertical variation of depolarization ratio, is also considered. The algorithm works well for both the 0.3° and 3° off-nadir lidar pointing geometry. When the lidar is pointed at 0.3° off nadir, half of the opaque ice clouds and about one-third of all ice clouds have a significant lidar backscatter contribution from specular reflections from horizontally oriented particles. At 3° off nadir, the lidar backscatter signals for roughly 30% of opaque ice clouds and 20% of all observed ice clouds are contaminated by horizontally oriented crystals.