Nathalie Gaspar

Dr. Nathalie Gaspar

Institut Gustave Roussy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NGNathalie Gaspar
Nathalie Gaspar
BOBob-Valéry Occéan
Bob-Valéry Occéan
HPHélène Pacquement
Hélène Pacquement
EBEmmanuelle Bompas
Emmanuelle Bompas
CBCorine Bouvier
Corine Bouvier
Laurence BrugièresLaurence Brugières
Laurence Brugières

1 July 2016 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFStéphanie Foulon
Stéphanie Foulon
BBBernadette Brennan
Bernadette Brennan
NGNathalie Gaspar
Nathalie Gaspar
UDUta Dirksen
Uta Dirksen
LJLee Jeys
Lee Jeys
MDMarie Cécile Le Deley
Marie Cécile Le Deley

1 September 2021 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NGNathalie Gaspar
Nathalie Gaspar
RVRajkumar Venkatramani
Rajkumar Venkatramani
SHStefanie Hecker-Nolting
Stefanie Hecker-Nolting
SMSoledad Gallego Melcon
Soledad Gallego Melcon
FLFranco Locatelli
Franco Locatelli
QCQuentin Campbell-Hewson
Quentin Campbell-Hewson

16 January 2018 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NGNathalie Gaspar
Nathalie Gaspar
LML.V. Marshall
L.V. Marshall
DBD. Binner
D. Binner
RHR. Herold
R. Herold
RRR. Rousseau
R. Rousseau
APA.D.J. Pearson
A.D.J. Pearson
The impressive progress recently observed in adult cancers through the introduction of new drugs has not yet been translated to adolescents 12–17 years of age [defined according to the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E11]. The current drug development landscape separates adult and paediatric drug development (Table 1). Adolescents are grouped with children, leading to a mismatch with a lack of trials for adolescents with relapsed cancer and delayed access to new, effective drugs already available for adults.

1 April 2017 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NONatacha Omer
Natacha Omer
MDMarie Cécile Le Deley
Marie Cécile Le Deley
SPSophie Piperno-Neumann
Sophie Piperno-Neumann
PMPerrine Marec-Berard
Perrine Marec-Berard
AIAntoine Italiano
Antoine Italiano
NGNathalie Gaspar
Nathalie Gaspar

22 September 2021 in ESMO Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NGNathalie Gaspar
Nathalie Gaspar
QCQ. Campbell-Hewson
Q. Campbell-Hewson
SMS. Gallego Melcon
S. Gallego Melcon
FLF. Locatelli
F. Locatelli
RVR. Venkatramani
R. Venkatramani
MCM. Casanova
M. Casanova
We report results from the phase I dose-finding and phase II expansion part of a multicenter, open-label study of single-agent lenvatinib in pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors, including osteosarcoma and radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) (NCT02432274). The primary endpoint of phase I was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of lenvatinib in children with relapsed/refractory solid malignant tumors. Phase II primary endpoints were progression-free survival rate at 4 months (PFS-4) for patients with relapsed/refractory osteosarcoma; and objective response rate/best overall response for patients with RR-DTC at the RP2D. In phase I, 23 patients (median age, 12 years) were enrolled. With lenvatinib 14 mg/m2, three dose-limiting toxicities (hypertension, n = 2; increased alanine aminotransferase, n = 1) were reported, establishing 14 mg/m2 as the RP2D. In phase II, 31 patients with osteosarcoma (median age, 15 years) and 1 patient with RR-DTC (age 17 years) were enrolled. For the osteosarcoma cohort, PFS-4 (binomial estimate) was 29.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14.2% to 48.0%; full analysis set: n = 31], PFS-4 by Kaplan–Meier estimate was 37.8% (95% CI 20.0% to 55.4%; full analysis set) and median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI 1.8-5.4 months). The objective response rate was 6.7% (95% CI 0.8% to 22.1%). The patient with RR-DTC had a best overall response of partial response. Some 60.8% of patients in phase I and 22.6% of patients in phase II (with osteosarcoma) had treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events of grade ≥3. The lenvatinib RP2D was 14 mg/m2. Single-agent lenvatinib showed activity in osteosarcoma; however, the null hypothesis could not be rejected. The safety profile was consistent with previous tyrosine kinase inhibitor studies. Lenvatinib is currently being investigated in osteosarcoma in combination with chemotherapy as part of a randomized, controlled trial (NCT04154189), in pediatric solid tumors in combination with everolimus (NCT03245151), and as a single agent in a basket study with enrollment ongoing (NCT04447755).