Pierluigi Vellucci

Dr. Pierluigi Vellucci

Roma Tre University, Rome, Lazio, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 April 2019 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Loretta MastroeniLoretta Mastroeni
Loretta Mastroeni
Pierluigi VellucciPierluigi Vellucci
Pierluigi Vellucci
MNMaurizio Naldi
Maurizio Naldi
Agent-based models are now largely adopted to describe how opinions emerge in a group of people. This survey provides an analysis of the literature on the subject, highlighting the major characteristics of such models. Over the last decade, the number of papers has grown at an overall annual rate of 16%, though not continually. Two communities contribute to the research effort: Physics and Control Systems. However, their mutual awareness and collaboration are rather low. The prevailing mechanism adopted to describe the interaction among the agents is bilateral, but not symmetric. In most cases, the opinion is described by a continuous variable. Just a few papers consider a utility function for the agents.

1 February 2017 in Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Lorenzo PareschiLorenzo Pareschi
Lorenzo Pareschi
Pierluigi VellucciPierluigi Vellucci
Pierluigi Vellucci
MZMattia Zanella
Mattia Zanella

11 April 2022 in Resources Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Loretta MastroeniLoretta Mastroeni
Loretta Mastroeni
AMAlessandro Mazzoccoli
Alessandro Mazzoccoli
GQGreta Quaresima
Greta Quaresima
Pierluigi VellucciPierluigi Vellucci
Pierluigi Vellucci

17 July 2019 in Annals of Operations Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Francesco BenedettoFrancesco Benedetto
Francesco Benedetto
Loretta MastroeniLoretta Mastroeni
Loretta Mastroeni
Pierluigi VellucciPierluigi Vellucci
Pierluigi Vellucci

10 April 2023 in Management Decision
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Loretta MastroeniLoretta Mastroeni
Loretta Mastroeni
MNMaurizio Naldi
Maurizio Naldi
Pierluigi VellucciPierluigi Vellucci
Pierluigi Vellucci
Purpose: Though the circular economy (CE) is a current buzzword, this still lacks a precise definition. In the absence of a clear notion of what that term includes, actions taken by the government and companies may not be well informed. In particular, those actions need to consider what people mean when people talk about the CE, either to refocus people's decisions or to undertake a more effective communications strategy.Design/methodology/approach: Since people voice people's opinions mainly through social media nowadays, special attention has to be paid to discussions on those media. In this paper, the authors focus on Twitter as a popular social platform to deliver one's thoughts quickly and fast. The authors' research aim is to get the perceptions of people about the CE. After collecting more than 100,000 tweets over 16 weeks, the authors analyse those tweets to understand the public discussion about the CE. The authors conduct a frequency analysis of the most recurring words, including the words' association with other words in the same context and categorise them into a set of topics.Findings: The authors show that the discussion focuses on the usage of resources and materials that heavily endanger sustainability, i.e. carbon and plastic and the harmful habit of wasting. On the other hand, the two most common good practices associated with the CE and sustainability emerge as recycling and reuse (the latter being mentioned far less). Also, the business side of the CE appears to be relevant.Research limitations/implications: The outcome of this analysis can drive suitable communication strategies by which companies and governments interested in the development of the CE can understand what is actually discussed on social media and call for the attention.Originality/value: This paper addresses the lack of a standard definition the authors highlighted in the Introduction. The results confirm that people understand CE by looking both at CE's constituent activities and CE's expected consequences, namely the reduction of waste, the transition to a green economy free of plastic and other pollutants and the improvement of the world climate.

6 October 2021 in The Journal of Mathematical Sociology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EIE. Iacomini
E. Iacomini
Pierluigi VellucciPierluigi Vellucci
Pierluigi Vellucci
In recent months, the figure of Greta Thunberg and the theme of climate changings quickly became the focus of the debate. This has led to a polarization effect in opinion forming about the climate subject. Starting from the analysis of this phenomenon, we develop an opinion dynamics model in which several types of contrarian agents are considered. Each agent is supposed to have an opinion on several topics related to each other; thus, the opinions being formed on these topics are also mutually dependent. The aim of the paper is to investigate the indirect effects of contrarian agents on the collective opinion about these topics. Several numerical tests are presented in order to highlight the main features of the model.