SUMMARY: Arginase is the focal enzyme of the urea cycle hydrolysing l‐arginine to urea and l‐ornithine. Emerging studies have identified arginase in the vasculature and have implicated this enzyme in the regulation of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis and the development of vascular disease. Arginase inhibits the production of NO via several potential mechanisms, including competition with NO synthase (NOS) for the substrate l‐arginine, uncoupling of NOS resulting in the generation of the NO scavenger, superoxide and peroxynitrite, repression of the translation and stability of inducible NOS protein, inhibition of inducible NOS activity via the generation of urea and by sensitization of NOS to its endogenous inhibitor asymmetric dimethyl‐l‐arginine. Upregulation of arginase inhibits endothelial NOS‐mediated NO synthesis and may contribute to endothelial dysfunction in hypertension, ageing, ischaemia–reperfusion and diabetes. Arginase also redirects the metabolism of l‐arginine to l‐ornithine and the formation of polyamines and l‐proline, which are essential for smooth muscle cell growth and collagen synthesis. Therefore, the induction of arginase may also promote aberrant vessel wall remodelling and neointima formation. Arginase represents a promising novel therapeutic target that may reverse endothelial and smooth muscle cell dysfunction and prevent vascular disease.

Emerging evidence indicates that l-glutamine (Gln) plays a fundamental role in cardiovascular physiology and pathology. By serving as a substrate for the synthesis of DNA, ATP, proteins, and lipids, Gln drives critical processes in vascular cells, including proliferation, migration, apoptosis, senescence, and extracellular matrix deposition. Furthermore, Gln exerts potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects in the circulation by inducing the expression of heme oxygenase-1, heat shock proteins, and glutathione. Gln also promotes cardiovascular health by serving as an l-arginine precursor to optimize nitric oxide synthesis. Importantly, Gln mitigates numerous risk factors for cardiovascular disease, such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, glucose intolerance, obesity, and diabetes. Many studies demonstrate that Gln supplementation protects against cardiometabolic disease, ischemia-reperfusion injury, sickle cell disease, cardiac injury by inimical stimuli, and may be beneficial in patients with heart failure. However, excessive shunting of Gln to the Krebs cycle can precipitate aberrant angiogenic responses and the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension. In these instances, therapeutic targeting of the enzymes involved in glutaminolysis such as glutaminase-1, Gln synthetase, glutamate dehydrogenase, and amino acid transaminase has shown promise in preclinical models. Future translation studies employing Gln delivery approaches and/or glutaminolysis inhibitors will determine the success of targeting Gln in cardiovascular disease.

The present study determined whether AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) regulates heme oxygenase (HO)-1 gene expression in endothelial cells (ECs) and if HO-1 contributes to the biological actions of this kinase. Treatment of human ECs with the AMPK activator 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-β-d-ribofuranoside (AICAR) stimulated a concentration- and time-dependent increase in HO-1 protein and mRNA expression that was associated with a prominent increase in nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) protein. Induction of HO-1 was also observed in rat carotid arteries after the in vivo application of AICAR. Induction of HO-1 by AICAR was blocked by the AMPK inhibitor compound C, the adenosine kinase inhibitor 5′-iodotubercidin, and by silencing AMPK-α_1/2 and was mimicked by the AMPK activator A-769662 and by infecting ECs with an adenovirus expressing constitutively active AMPK-α₁. AICAR also induced a significant rise in HO-1 promoter activity that was abolished by mutating the antioxidant responsive elements of the HO-1 promoter or by the overexpression of dominant negative Nrf2. Finally, activation of AMPK inhibited cytokine-mediated EC death, and this was prevented by the HO inhibitor tin protoporphyrin-IX or by silencing HO-1 expression. In conclusion, AMPK stimulates HO-1 gene expression in human ECs via the Nrf2/antioxidant responsive element signaling pathway. The induction of HO-1 mediates the antiapoptotic effect of AMPK, and this may provide an important adaptive response to preserve EC viability during periods of metabolic stress.

Carbon monoxide (CO) is an endogenously derived gas formed from the breakdown of heme by the enzyme heme oxygenase. Although long considered an insignificant and potentially toxic waste product of heme catabolism, CO is now recognized as a key signaling molecule that regulates numerous cardiovascular functions. Interestingly, alterations in CO synthesis are associated with many cardiovascular disorders, including atherosclerosis, septic shock, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and ischemia-reperfusion injury. Significantly, restoration of physiologic CO levels exerts a beneficial effect in many of these settings, suggesting a crucial role for CO in maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis. In this review, we outline the actions of CO in the cardiovascular system and highlight this gas as a potential therapeutic target in treating a multitude of cardiovascular disorders.

Objective— Survival of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) in hemodialysis patients is associated with both far infrared (FIR) therapy and length polymorphisms of the heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) promoter. In this study, we evaluated whether there is an interaction between FIR radiation and HO-1 in regulating vascular inflammation. Methods and Results— Treatment of cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (ECs) with FIR radiation stimulated HO-1 protein, mRNA, and promoter activity. HO-1 induction was dependent on the activation of the antioxidant responsive element/NF-E2-related factor-2 complex, and was likely a consequence of heat stress. FIR radiation also inhibited tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α–mediated expression of E-selectin, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, interleukin-8, and the cytokine-mediated adhesion of monocytes to ECs. The antiinflammatory action of FIR was mimicked by bilirubin, and was reversed by the HO inhibitor, tin protoporphyrin-IX, or by the selective knockdown of HO-1. Finally, the antiinflammatory effect of FIR was also observed in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Conclusions— These results demonstrate that FIR therapy exerts a potent antiinflammatory effect via the induction of HO-1. The ability of FIR therapy to inhibit inflammation may play a critical role in preserving blood flow and patency of AVFs in hemodialysis patients.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in diabetes. Recent clinical studies indicate that sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes. The mechanism underlying the beneficial effect of SGLT2 inhibitors is not completely clear but may involve direct actions on vascular cells. SGLT2 inhibitors increase the bioavailability of endothelium-derived nitric oxide and thereby restore endothelium-dependent vasodilation in diabetes. In addition, SGLT2 inhibitors favorably regulate the proliferation, migration, differentiation, survival, and senescence of endothelial cells (ECs). Moreover, they exert potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects in ECs. SGLT2 inhibitors also inhibit the contraction of vascular smooth muscle cells and block the proliferation and migration of these cells. Furthermore, studies demonstrate that SGLT2 inhibitors prevent postangioplasty restenosis, maladaptive remodeling of the vasculature in pulmonary arterial hypertension, the formation of abdominal aortic aneurysms, and the acceleration of arterial stiffness in diabetes. However, the role of SGLT2 in mediating the vascular actions of these drugs remains to be established as important off-target effects of SGLT2 inhibitors have been identified. Future studies distinguishing drug- versus class-specific effects may optimize the selection of specific SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with distinct cardiovascular pathologies.