Marta Hernández

Dr. Marta Hernández

Blanquerna School of Health Sciences. University Ramon Llull
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2021 in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJesús Ruiz-Ramos
Jesús Ruiz-Ramos
MHMarta Hernández
Marta Hernández
AJAna M. Juanes-Borrego
Ana M. Juanes-Borrego
RMRaimon Milà
Raimon Milà
MMMaria A. Mangues-Bafalluy
Maria A. Mangues-Bafalluy
CMConxita Mestres
Conxita Mestres

1 March 2021 in Behavioural Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMaria J Arranz
Maria J Arranz
JSJuliana Salazar
Juliana Salazar
MHMarta Hernández
Marta Hernández

8 March 2023 in Pharmaceuticals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NGNoé Garin
Noé Garin
BZBorja Zarate-Tamames
Borja Zarate-Tamames
LGLaura Gras-Martín
Laura Gras-Martín
RMRaimon Milà-Villarroel
Raimon Milà-Villarroel
ACAstrid Crespo-Lessmann
Astrid Crespo-Lessmann
VPVicente Plaza
Vicente Plaza
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to gain insight into the characteristics and clinical impact of electronic monitoring devices of inhalers (EMDs) and their clinical interventions in adult patients with asthma or COPD. The search included PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus and Embase databases, as well as official EMDs websites. We found eight observational studies and ten clinical trials, assessing a wide range of clinical outcomes. Results from the meta-analysis on adherence to inhalers in a period over three months were favourable in the EMD group (fixed effects model: SMD: 0.36 [0.25–0.48]; random effects model SMD: 0.41 [0.22–0.60]). An exploratory meta-analysis found an improvement in ACT score (fixed effect model SMD: 0.25 [0.11–0.39]; random effects model: SMD: 0.47 [−0.14–1.08]). Other clinical outcomes showed mixed results in the descriptive analyses. The findings of this review highlight the benefits of EMDs in the optimization of adherence to inhaled therapy as well as the potential interest in other clinical outcomes.

7 February 2024 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMarta Hernández
Marta Hernández
NCNatalia Cullell
Natalia Cullell
MCMarc Cendrós
Marc Cendrós
ASAlexandre Serra-LLovich
Alexandre Serra-LLovich
MAMaria J Arranz
Maria J Arranz
Decades of pharmacogenetic research have revealed genetic biomarkers of clinical response to antipsychotics. Genetic variants in antipsychotic targets, dopamine and serotonin receptors in particular, and in metabolic enzymes have been associated with the efficacy and toxicity of antipsychotic treatments. However, genetic prediction of antipsychotic response based on these biomarkers is far from accurate. Despite the clinical validity of these findings, the clinical utility remains unclear. Nevertheless, genetic information on CYP metabolic enzymes responsible for the biotransformation of most commercially available antipsychotics has proven to be effective for the personalisation of clinical dosing, resulting in a reduction of induced side effects and in an increase in efficacy. However, pharmacogenetic information is rarely used in psychiatric settings as a prescription aid. Lack of studies on cost-effectiveness, absence of clinical guidelines based on pharmacogenetic biomarkers for several commonly used antipsychotics, the cost of genetic testing and the delay in results delivery hamper the implementation of pharmacogenetic interventions in clinical settings. This narrative review will comment on the existing pharmacogenetic information, the clinical utility of pharmacogenetic findings, and their current and future implementations.

MHMarta Hernández
Marta Hernández
Conxita MestresConxita Mestres
Conxita Mestres
PMPilar Modamio
Pilar Modamio
JJJaume Junyent
Jaume Junyent
LCLluís Costa-Tutusaus
Lluís Costa-Tutusaus
EMEduardo L. Mariño
Eduardo L. Mariño
Older people usually present with adverse drug events (ADEs) with nonspecific symptoms such as cognitive decline, recurrent falls, reduced mobility, and/or major deterioration. The aims of this study were to assess the ADEs of patients with dementia and presenting neuropsychiatric/behavioral, and psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD) and to categorize and identify the principal factors that allow to prevent ADEs, and separately ADEs that result in falls. To that end, a one-year prospective study in a psychogeriatric ward (July 2015 to July 2016) was performed. All patients admitted to this ward were eligible for enrolment. Patients who met any of the following criteria were excluded from the study: Patients without cognitive impairment, a length of stay under 7 days, and palliative or previous psychiatric pathology. We included 65 patients (60% women, 84.9 years ± 6.7) with mild to moderate cognitive impairment, moderate to severe functional dependence, and a high prevalence of geriatric syndromes and comorbidity. A total of 87.7% were taking five or more drugs (mean 9.0 ± 3.1). ADEs were identified during the interdisciplinary meeting and the follow up by clinical record. Sixty-eight ADEs (81.5% patients) were identified, of which 73.5% were not related to falls. From these, 80% were related to drugs of the nervous system. The Naranjo algorithm determined that 90% of ADEs were probable. The severity of the ADEs was Category E in 34 patients (68%). The number of preventable ADE according to the Schumork–Thornton test was 58%. The main ADE was drowsiness/somnolence (27.7%). ADEs related to falls represented a 26.5%. The balance between effective treatment and safety is complex in these patients. A medication review in interdisciplinary teams is an essential component to optimize safety prevention.

6 May 2022 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMaria J Arranz
Maria J Arranz
JSJuliana Salazar
Juliana Salazar
VBValentin Bote
Valentin Bote
AAAlicia Artigas-Baleri
Alicia Artigas-Baleri
ASAlexandre Serra-LLovich
Alexandre Serra-LLovich
AHAmaia Hervas
Amaia Hervas
BACKGROUND: Autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) are severe neurodevelopmental alterations characterised by deficits in social communication and repetitive and restricted behaviours. About a third of patients receive pharmacological treatment for comorbid symptoms. However, 30–50% do not respond adequately and/or present severe and long-lasting side effects. METHODS: Genetic variants in CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and SLC6A4 were investigated in N = 42 ASD sufferers resistant to pharmacological treatment. Clinical recommendations based on their pharmacogenetic profiles were provided within 24–48 h of receiving a biological sample. RESULTS: A total of 39 participants (93%) improved after the pharmacogenetic intervention according to their CGI scores (difference in basal-final scores: 2.26, SD 1.55) and 37 participants (88%) according to their CGAS scores (average improvement of 20.29, SD 11.85). Twenty-three of them (55%) achieved symptom stability (CGI ≤ 3 and CGAS improvement ≥ 20 points), requiring less frequent visits to their clinicians and hospital stays. Furthermore, the clinical improvement was higher than that observed in a control group (N = 62) with no pharmacogenetic interventions, in which 66% responded to treatment (difference in CGI scores: −0.87, SD 9.4, p = 1 × 10−5; difference in CGAS scores: 6.59, SD 7.76, p = 5 × 10−8). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of pharmacogenetic interventions has the potential to significantly improve the clinical outcomes in severe comorbid ASD populations with drug treatment resistance and poor prognosis.