Evangelos Terpos

Prof. Evangelos Terpos

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens NKUA, School of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 May 2020 in American Journal of Hematology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Evangelos TerposEvangelos Terpos
Evangelos Terpos
Ioannis Ntanasis-StathopoulosIoannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
IEIsmail Elalamy
Ismail Elalamy
EKEfstathios Kastritis
Efstathios Kastritis
TSTheodoros N. Sergentanis
Theodoros N. Sergentanis
Meletios-Athanasios DimopoulosMeletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
COVID‐19 is a systemic infection with a significant impact on the hematopoietic system and hemostasis. Lymphopenia may be considered as a cardinal laboratory finding, with prognostic potential. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and peak platelet/lymphocyte ratio may also have prognostic value in determining severe cases. During the disease course, longitudinal evaluation of lymphocyte count dynamics and inflammatory indices, including LDH, CRP and IL‐6 may help to identify cases with dismal prognosis and prompt intervention in order to improve outcomes. Biomarkers, such high serum procalcitonin and ferritin have also emerged as poor prognostic factors. Furthermore, blood hypercoagulability is common among hospitalized COVID‐19 patients. Elevated D‐Dimer levels are consistently reported, whereas their gradual increase during disease course is particularly associated with disease worsening. Other coagulation abnormalities such as PT and aPTT prolongation, fibrin degradation products increase, with severe thrombocytopenia lead to life‐threatening disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which necessitates continuous vigilance and prompt intervention. So, COVID‐19 infected patients, whether hospitalized or ambulatory, are at high risk for venous thromboembolism, and an early and prolonged pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin is highly recommended. Last but not least, the need for assuring blood donations during the pandemic is also highlighted.

1 October 2015 in Haematologica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Evangelos TerposEvangelos Terpos
Evangelos Terpos
MKM. Kleber
M. Kleber
MEM. Engelhardt
M. Engelhardt
SZS. Zweegman
S. Zweegman
Francesca GayFrancesca Gay
Francesca Gay
ONOn Behalf Of The European Myeloma Network
On Behalf Of The European Myeloma Network
The European Myeloma Network provides recommendations for the management of the most common complications of multiple myeloma. Whole body low-dose computed tomography is more sensitive than conventional radiography in depicting osteolytic disease and thus we recommend it as the novel standard for the detection of lytic lesions in myeloma (grade 1A). Myeloma patients with adequate renal function and bone disease at diagnosis should be treated with zoledronic acid or pamidronate (grade 1A). Symptomatic patients without lytic lesions on conventional radiography can be treated with zoledronic acid (grade 1B), but its advantage is not clear for patients with no bone involvement on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. In asymptomatic myeloma, bisphosphonates are not recommended (grade 1A). Zoledronic acid should be given continuously, but it is not clear if patients who achieve at least a very good partial response benefit from its continuous use (grade 1B). Treatment with erythropoietic-stimulating agents may be initiated in patients with persistent symptomatic anemia (hemoglobin <10g/dL) in whom other causes of anemia have been excluded (grade 1B). Erythropoietic agents should be stopped after 6–8 weeks if no adequate hemoglobin response is achieved. For renal impairment, bortezomib-based regimens are the current standard of care (grade 1A). For the management of treatment-induced peripheral neuropathy, drug modification is needed (grade 1C). Vaccination against influenza is recommended; vaccination against streptococcus pneumonia and hemophilus influenza is appropriate, but efficacy is not guaranteed due to suboptimal immune response (grade 1C). Prophylactic aciclovir (or valacyclovir) is recommended for patients receiving proteasome inhibitors, autologous or allogeneic transplantation (grade 1A).

12 January 2018 in Blood Cancer Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Evangelos TerposEvangelos Terpos
Evangelos Terpos
Ioannis Ntanasis-StathopoulosIoannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
MGMaria Gavriatopoulou
Maria Gavriatopoulou
MDMeletios A. Dimopoulos
Meletios A. Dimopoulos
Osteolytic bone disease is the hallmark of multiple myeloma, which deteriorates the quality of life of myeloma patients, and it affects dramatically their morbidity and mortality. The basis of the pathogenesis of myeloma-related bone disease is the uncoupling of the bone-remodeling process. The interaction between myeloma cells and the bone microenvironment ultimately leads to the activation of osteoclasts and suppression of osteoblasts, resulting in bone loss. Several intracellular and intercellular signaling cascades, including RANK/RANKL/OPG, Notch, Wnt, and numerous chemokines and interleukins are implicated in this complex process. During the last years, osteocytes have emerged as key regulators of bone loss in myeloma through direct interactions with the myeloma cells. The myeloma-induced crosstalk among the molecular pathways establishes a positive feedback that sustains myeloma cell survival and continuous bone destruction, even when a plateau phase of the disease has been achieved. Targeted therapies, based on the better knowledge of the biology, constitute a promising approach in the management of myeloma-related bone disease and several novel agents are currently under investigation. Herein, we provide an insight into the underlying pathogenesis of bone disease and discuss possible directions for future studies.

16 January 2018 in Journal of Hematology & Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJo Caers
Jo Caers
Bruno David Lourenco PaivaBruno David Lourenco Paiva
Bruno David Lourenco Paiva
Elena ZamagniElena Zamagni
Elena Zamagni
XLXavier LELEU
Xavier LELEU
Joan BladéJoan Bladé
Joan Bladé
LRLaura Rosiñol
Laura Rosiñol
Solitary plasmacytoma is an infrequent form of plasma cell dyscrasia that presents as a single mass of monoclonal plasma cells, located either extramedullary or intraosseous. In some patients, a bone marrow aspiration can detect a low monoclonal plasma cell infiltration which indicates a high risk of early progression to an overt myeloma disease. Before treatment initiation, whole body positron emission tomography–computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging should be performed to exclude the presence of additional malignant lesions. For decades, treatment has been based on high-dose radiation, but studies exploring the potential benefit of systemic therapies for high-risk patients are urgently needed. In this review, a panel of expert European hematologists updates the recommendations on the diagnosis and management of patients with solitary plasmacytoma.

20 June 2013 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Evangelos TerposEvangelos Terpos
Evangelos Terpos
GMGareth John Morgan
Gareth John Morgan
Meletios-Athanasios DimopoulosMeletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
MDMatthew T. Drake
Matthew T. Drake
SLSuzanne Lentzsch
Suzanne Lentzsch
GRG. David Roodman
G. David Roodman
Purpose: The aim of the International Myeloma Working Group was to develop practice recommendations for the management of multiple myeloma (MM) –related bone disease.Methodology: An interdisciplinary panel of clinical experts on MM and myeloma bone disease developed recommendations based on published data through August 2012. Expert consensus was used to propose additional recommendations in situations where there were insufficient published data. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations were assigned and approved by panel members.Recommendations: Bisphosphonates (BPs) should be considered in all patients with MM receiving first-line antimyeloma therapy, regardless of presence of osteolytic bone lesions on conventional radiography. However, it is unknown if BPs offer any advantage in patients with no bone disease assessed by magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Intravenous (IV) zoledronic acid (ZOL) or pamidronate (PAM) is recommended for preventing skeletal-related events in patients with MM. ZOL is preferred over oral clodronate in newly diagnosed patients with MM because of its potential antimyeloma effects and survival benefits. BPs should be administered every 3 to 4 weeks IV during initial therapy. ZOL or PAM should be continued in patients with active disease and should be resumed after disease relapse, if discontinued in patients achieving complete or very good partial response. BPs are well tolerated, but preventive strategies must be instituted to avoid renal toxicity or osteonecrosis of the jaw. Kyphoplasty should be considered for symptomatic vertebral compression fractures. Low-dose radiation therapy can be used for palliation of uncontrolled pain, impending pathologic fracture, or spinal cord compression. Orthopedic consultation should be sought for long-bone fractures, spinal cord compression, and vertebral column instability.

18 August 2006 in British Journal of Haematology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KZKostas Zervas
Kostas Zervas
EVEvgenia Verrou
Evgenia Verrou
ZTZisis Teleioudis
Zisis Teleioudis
KVKonstantinos Vahtsevanos
Konstantinos Vahtsevanos
ABAnastasia Banti
Anastasia Banti
Evangelos TerposEvangelos Terpos
Evangelos Terpos
Summary: The incidence, characteristics and risk factors for the development of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) were evaluated among 303 myeloma patients. Only patients who received bisphosphonates developed ONJ (28/254; 11%). Zoledronic acid produced 9·5‐fold greater risk for developing ONJ than pamidronate alone (P = 0·042) and 4·5‐fold greater risk than subsequent use of pamidronate + zoledronic acid (P = 0·018). Use of thalidomide and number of bisphosphonate infusions also increased the risk for ONJ by 2·4‐fold (P = 0·043), and 4·9‐fold respectively (P = 0·012). ONJ developed earlier among patients receiving zoledronic acid. Our data indicates that administration of zoledronic acid for more than 2 years or in combination with thalidomide requires caution in myeloma.