Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18–fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for initial staging and therapy planning in pediatric sarcoma patients. Patients and Methods In this prospective multicenter study, 46 pediatric patients (females, n = 22; males, n = 24; age range, 1 to 18 years) with histologically proven sarcoma (Ewing sarcoma family tumors, n = 23; osteosarcoma, n = 11; rhabdomyosarcoma, n = 12) were examined with conventional imaging modalities (CIMs), including ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scintigraphy according to the standardized algorithms of the international therapy optimization trials, and whole-body FDG-PET. A lesion- and patient-based analysis of PET alone and CIMs alone and a side-by-side (SBS) analysis of FDG-PET and CIMs were performed. The standard of reference consisted of all imaging material, follow-up data (mean follow-up time, 24 ± 12 months), and histopathology and was determined by an interdisciplinary tumor board. Results FDG-PET and CIMs were equally effective in the detection of primary tumors (accuracy, 100%). PET was superior to CIMs concerning the correct detection of lymph node involvement (sensitivity, 95% v 25%, respectively) and bone manifestations (sensitivity, 90% v 57%, respectively), whereas CT was more reliable than FDG-PET in depicting lung metastases (sensitivity, 100% v 25%, respectively). The patient-based analysis revealed the best results for SBS, with 91% correct therapy decisions. This was significantly superior to CIMs (59%; P < .001). Conclusion In staging pediatric sarcoma, subsidiary FDG-PET scanning depicts important additional information and has a relevant impact on therapy planning when analyzed side-by-side with CIMs.

Purpose: In adult Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) risk stratification after early therapy response assessment with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) seems to allow tailoring therapy with less toxicity for patients with adequate metabolic response. This study delivers the first prospective data on the potential of FDG-PET for response assessment in pediatric HL. Patients and Methods: FDG-PET was performed in 40 pediatric HL patients before polychemotherapy (PET-1), after two cycles of polychemotherapy (PET-2), and after completion of polychemotherapy (PET-3). Mean follow-up was 46 months (range, 26 to 72 months). Results: At early and late response assessment, the proportion of PET-negative patients was significantly higher compared with those patients with negative findings in conventional imaging methods (CIMs; PET-2, 26 of 40 v CIM-2, one of 40; P < .001; PET-3, 21 of 29 v CIM-3, four of 29; P < .001). Sensitivity and negative predictive value were 100% for early and late therapy response assessment by PET. Both patients suffering a relapse during follow-up were identified by PET-2/3, whereas one of these patients was not detected by CIM-3. PET was superior to CIMs with regard to specificity in early and late therapy response assessment (68% v 3%, and 78% v 11%, respectively; both P < .001). Specificity of early therapy response assessment by PET was improved to 97% by quantitative analysis of maximal standardized uptake value reduction using a cutoff value of 58%. Conclusion: Pediatric HL patients with a negative PET in response assessment have an excellent prognosis while PET-positive patients have an increased risk for relapse.

The diagnostic value of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) imaging using PET with integrated CT is dependent on both components. This retrospective study assessed the value of the single CT phases of a triple-phase (early arterial, portal-venous inflow, and venous) CT protocol in comparison to (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET in a masked reading. (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT examinations from 51 patients with known or suspected NET were included. Two readers assessed the data of PET and each of the 3 CT phases for NET lesions independently (using a 3-point score: 1 = benign, 2 = indeterminate, and 3 = malignant) and by consensus (using binary benign/malignant interpretation only). Only lesions within the field of the abdominal scan were evaluated. Clinical and imaging follow-up, histopathology (if available), and the decision of an interdisciplinary truth-panel served as a standard of reference. In addition to the calculation of standard statistical parameters (including general linear mixed models), interobserver reliability was estimated (Cohen's κ). Of 510 abdominal lesions observed, 354 were classified as malignant. Sensitivity was 77.1% for combined triple-phase CT, 53.4% for arterial CT, 66.1% for portal-venous CT, 66.9% for venous CT, and 72.8% for PET. The respective specificities were 85.3%, 92.9%, 92.3%, 89.7%, and 97.4%, and the respective accuracies were 79.6%, 65.5%, 74.1%, 73.9%, and 80.4%. Although arterial CT was found to be inferior to PET, portal-venous CT, and venous CT (P < 0.001), the differences between the other scans were not significant. Detection was exclusively by PET for 16.1% of lesions, by triple-phase CT for 20.3%, by arterial CT for 0.5%, by portal-venous CT for 3.9%, and by venous CT for 3.9%. Regarding interobserver reliability, the κ-value was 0.768 for PET, 0.391 for triple-phase CT, 0.577 for arterial CT, 0.583 for portal-venous CT, and 0.482 for venous CT. No CT phase can be omitted in NET imaging, and the triple-phase protocol continues to be strongly recommended also for PET/CT.

⁹⁰Y radioembolization is a promising therapy for patients with primary and secondary liver malignancies. Pretherapeutic assessment consists of hepatic angiography and ^99mTc-macroaggregated albumin (^99mTc-MAA) perfusion scintigraphy to estimate the liver-to-lung shunt and exclude extrahepatic ^99mTc-MAA deposition. However, the predictive value of intratumoral ^99mTc-MAA uptake remains unclear. Methods: One hundred four patients with chemotherapy-refractory liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer were treated with ⁹⁰Y radioembolization between December 2006 and December 2010. All of the patients underwent angiographic assessment and perfusion scintigraphy with ^99mTc-MAA before lobar ⁹⁰Y radioembolization. For inclusion, patients must have undergone pretherapeutic and follow-up MR imaging (6 wk and 3 mo after radioembolization, respectively). The degree of intratumoral ^99mTc-MAA uptake was rated, and liver metastases were classified according to changes in tumor diameter on both an individual and a patient basis using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Response at both time points, MAA uptake, and catheter position were then statistically analyzed in a linear and generalized linear mixed model at a significance level of 0.05 (P value). Results: Sixty-six patients with a total of 435 colorectal liver metastases (mean number of lesions ± SD, 6.6 ± 2.8; mean lesion size ± SD, 33.8 ± 21.2 mm; lesion size range, 10–154 mm) were included in this analysis. According to the patient-based analysis, 3 patients had partial response, 49 stable disease, and 6 progressive disease after 6 wk. After 3 mo, 5 patients showed partial response, 26 stable disease, and 17 progressive disease. There was no association of patient-based tumor response with overall ^99mTc-MAA uptake (P = 0.172) or with catheter position (P = 0.6456). Furthermore, an interaction effect of ^99mTc-MAA uptake and catheter position in relation to tumor response was not found (P = 0.512). Moreover, in lesion-based analysis according to RECIST 1.1 there was no association of tumor response with degree of ^99mTc-MAA uptake, catheter position, or interaction of ^99mTc-MAA uptake and catheter position (P = 0.339, 0.593, and 0.658, respectively). Conclusion: Response to ⁹⁰Y radioembolization was found to be independent of the degree of ^99mTc-MAA uptake. Therefore, therapy should not be withheld from patients with colorectal liver metastases lacking intratumoral ^99mTc-MAA accumulation.

We evaluated whether the artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT can adequately answer patient questions related to [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in common clinical indications before and after scanning. Methods: Thirteen questions regarding [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT were submitted to ChatGPT. ChatGPT was also asked to explain 6 PET/CT reports (lung cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma) and answer 6 follow-up questions (e.g., on tumor stage or recommended treatment). To be rated “useful” or “appropriate,” a response had to be adequate by the standards of the nuclear medicine staff. Inconsistency was assessed by regenerating responses. Results: Responses were rated “appropriate” for 92% of 25 tasks and “useful” for 96%. Considerable inconsistencies were found between regenerated responses for 16% of tasks. Responses to 83% of sensitive questions (e.g., staging/treatment options) were rated “empathetic.” Conclusion: ChatGPT might adequately substitute for advice given to patients by nuclear medicine staff in the investigated settings. Improving the consistency of ChatGPT would further increase reliability. Visual Abstract