Eric Deleersnijder

Dr. Eric Deleersnijder

Université catholique de Louvain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

39Years (1988-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in Ocean Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ESErik van Sebille
Erik van Sebille
SGStephen M. Griffies
Stephen M. Griffies
RARyan Abernathey
Ryan Abernathey
TAThomas P. Adams
Thomas P. Adams
PBPavel Berloff
Pavel Berloff
JZJan D. Zika
Jan D. Zika
Lagrangian analysis is a powerful way to analyse the output of ocean circulation models and other ocean velocity data such as from altimetry. In the Lagrangian approach, large sets of virtual particles are integrated within the three-dimensional, time-evolving velocity fields. Over several decades, a variety of tools and methods for this purpose have emerged. Here, we review the state of the art in the field of Lagrangian analysis of ocean velocity data, starting from a fundamental kinematic framework and with a focus on large-scale open ocean applications. Beyond the use of explicit velocity fields, we consider the influence of unresolved physics and dynamics on particle trajectories. We comprehensively list and discuss the tools currently available for tracking virtual particles. We then showcase some of the innovative applications of trajectory data, and conclude with some open questions and an outlook. The overall goal of this review paper is to reconcile some of the different techniques and methods in Lagrangian ocean analysis, while recognising the rich diversity of codes that have and continue to emerge, and the challenges of the coming age of petascale computing

2 November 2010 in Geoscientific Model Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HGH. Goosse
H. Goosse
VBV. Brovkin
V. Brovkin
TFT. Fichefet
T. Fichefet
RHR. Haarsma
R. Haarsma
PHP. Huybrechts
P. Huybrechts
SWS. L. Weber
S. L. Weber
The main characteristics of the new version 1.2 of the three-dimensional Earth system model of intermediate complexity LOVECLIM are briefly described. LOVECLIM 1.2 includes representations of the atmosphere, the ocean and sea ice, the land surface (including vegetation), the ice sheets, the icebergs and the carbon cycle. The atmospheric component is ECBilt2, a T21, 3-level quasi-geostrophic model. The ocean component is CLIO3, which consists of an ocean general circulation model coupled to a comprehensive thermodynamic-dynamic sea-ice model. Its horizontal resolution is of 3° by 3°, and there are 20 levels in the ocean. ECBilt-CLIO is coupled to VECODE, a vegetation model that simulates the dynamics of two main terrestrial plant functional types, trees and grasses, as well as desert. VECODE also simulates the evolution of the carbon cycle over land while the ocean carbon cycle is represented by LOCH, a comprehensive model that takes into account both the solubility and biological pumps. The ice sheet component AGISM is made up of a three-dimensional thermomechanical model of the ice sheet flow, a visco-elastic bedrock model and a model of the mass balance at the ice-atmosphere and ice-ocean interfaces. For both the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, calculations are made on a 10 km by 10 km resolution grid with 31 sigma levels. LOVECLIM1.2 reproduces well the major characteristics of the observed climate both for present-day conditions and for key past periods such as the last millennium, the mid-Holocene and the Last Glacial Maximum. However, despite some improvements compared to earlier versions, some biases are still present in the model. The most serious ones are mainly located at low latitudes with an overestimation of the temperature there, a too symmetric distribution of precipitation between the two hemispheres, and an overestimation of precipitation and vegetation cover in the subtropics. In addition, the atmospheric circulation is too weak. The model also tends to underestimate the surface temperature changes (mainly at low latitudes) and to overestimate the ocean heat uptake observed over the last decades.

1 January 1989 in Progress in Oceanography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJ.J. Walsh
J.J. Walsh
CMC.P. McRoy
C.P. McRoy
LCL.K. Coachman
L.K. Coachman
JGJ.J. Goering
J.J. Goering
JNJ.J. Nihoul
J.J. Nihoul
KDK. Dean
K. Dean

1 April 2001 in Journal of Marine Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Eric DeleersnijderEric Deleersnijder
Eric Deleersnijder
JCJean-Michel Campin
Jean-Michel Campin
EDEric J.M. Delhez
Eric J.M. Delhez

1 January 1999 in Ocean Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EDEric J.M. Delhez
Eric J.M. Delhez
JCJean-Michel Campin
Jean-Michel Campin
AHAnthony C. Hirst
Anthony C. Hirst
Eric DeleersnijderEric Deleersnijder
Eric Deleersnijder

1 December 2004 in Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ÉDÉric J.M. Delhez
Éric J.M. Delhez
AHArnold W. Heemink
Arnold W. Heemink
Eric DeleersnijderEric Deleersnijder
Eric Deleersnijder