Gianluca Serafini

Prof. Gianluca Serafini

University of Genoa
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 June 2020 in QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gianluca SerafiniGianluca Serafini
Gianluca Serafini
BPB Parmigiani
B Parmigiani
Andrea AmerioAndrea Amerio
Andrea Amerio
AAA Aguglia
A Aguglia
LSLeo Sher
Leo Sher
MAM Amore
M Amore
As a result of the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the Chinese city of Wuhan, a situation of socio-economic crisis and profound psychological distress rapidly occurred worldwide. Various psychological problems and important consequences in terms of mental health including stress, anxiety, depression, frustration, uncertainty during COVID-19 outbreak emerged progressively. This work aimed to comprehensively review the current literature about the impact of COVID-19 infection on the mental health in the general population. The psychological impact of quarantine related to COVID-19 infection has been additionally documented together with the most relevant psychological reactions in the general population related to COVID-19 outbreak. The role of risk and protective factors against the potential to develop psychiatric disorders in vulnerable individuals has been addressed as well. The main implications of the present findings have been discussed.

25 March 2020 in Psychiatry Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Laura OrsoliniLaura Orsolini
Laura Orsolini
RLRoberto Latini
Roberto Latini
Maurizio PompiliMaurizio Pompili
Maurizio Pompili
Gianluca SerafiniGianluca Serafini
Gianluca Serafini
Umberto VolpeUmberto Volpe
Umberto Volpe
Domenico De BerardisDomenico De Berardis
Domenico De Berardis
Objective Amongst psychiatric disorders, major depressive disorder (MDD) is the most prevalent, by affecting approximately 15–17% of the population and showing a high suicide risk rate equivalent to around 15%. The present comprehensive overview aims at evaluating main research studies in the field of MDD at suicide risk, by proposing as well as a schematic suicide risk stratification and useful flow-chart for planning suicide preventive and therapeutic interventions for clinicians.Methods A broad and comprehensive overview has been here conducted by using PubMed/Medline, combining the search strategy of free text terms and exploded MESH headings for the topics of ‘Major Depressive Disorder’ and ‘Suicide’ as following: ((suicide [Title/Abstract]) AND (major depressive disorder [Title/Abstract])). All articles published in English through May 31, 2019 were summarized in a comprehensive way.Results Despite possible pathophysiological factors which may explain the complexity of suicide in MDD, scientific evidence supposed the synergic role of genetics, exogenous and endogenous stressors (i.e., interpersonal, professional, financial, as well as psychiatric disorders), epigenetic, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress-response system, the involvement of the monoaminergic neurotransmitter systems, particularly the serotonergic ones, the lipid profile, neuro-immunological biomarkers, the Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and other neuromodulators.Conclusion The present overview reported that suicide is a highly complex and multifaceted phenomenon in which a large plethora of mechanisms could be variable implicated, particularly amongst MDD subjects. Beyond these consideration, modern psychiatry needs a better interpretation of suicide risk with a more careful assessment of suicide risk stratification and planning of clinical and treatment interventions.

Andrea AmerioAndrea Amerio
Andrea Amerio
Andrea BrambillaAndrea Brambilla
Andrea Brambilla
AMAlessandro Morganti
Alessandro Morganti
Andrea AgugliaAndrea Aguglia
Andrea Aguglia
Davide BianchiDavide Bianchi
Davide Bianchi
Stefano CapolongoStefano Capolongo
Stefano Capolongo
Since the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak a pandemic on 11 March, severe lockdown measures have been adopted by the Italian Government. For over two months of stay-at-home orders, houses became the only place where people slept, ate, worked, practiced sports, and socialized. As consolidated evidence exists on housing as a determinant of health, it is of great interest to explore the impact that COVID-19 response-related lockdown measures have had on mental health and well-being. We conducted a large web-based survey on 8177 students from a university institute in Milan, Northern Italy, one of the regions most heavily hit by the pandemic in Europe. As emerged from our analysis, poor housing is associated with increased risk of depressive symptoms during lockdown. In particular, living in apartments <60 m2 with poor views and scarce indoor quality is associated with, respectively, 1.31 (95% CI: 1046–1637), 1.368 (95% CI: 1166–1605), and 2.253 (95% CI: 1918–2647) times the risk of moderate–severe and severe depressive symptoms. Subjects reporting worsened working performance from home were over four times more likely to also report depression (OR = 4.28, 95% CI: 3713–4924). Housing design strategies should focus on larger and more livable living spaces facing green areas. We argue that a strengthened multi-interdisciplinary approach, involving urban planning, public mental health, environmental health, epidemiology, and sociology, is needed to investigate the effects of the built environment on mental health, so as to inform welfare and housing policies centered on population well-being.

Maurizio PompiliMaurizio Pompili
Maurizio Pompili
Gianluca SerafiniGianluca Serafini
Gianluca Serafini
Marco InnamoratiMarco Innamorati
Marco Innamorati
GDGiovanni Dominici
Giovanni Dominici
Stefano FerracutiStefano Ferracuti
Stefano Ferracuti
David LesterDavid Lester
David Lester
Suicide is an escalating public health problem, and alcohol use has consistently been implicated in the precipitation of suicidal behavior. Alcohol abuse may lead to suicidality through disinhibition, impulsiveness and impaired judgment, but it may also be used as a means to ease the distress associated with committing an act of suicide. We reviewed evidence of the relationship between alcohol use and suicide through a search of MedLine and PsychInfo electronic databases. Multiple genetically-related intermediate phenotypes might influence the relationship between alcohol and suicide. Psychiatric disorders, including psychosis, mood disorders and anxiety disorders, as well as susceptibility to stress, might increase the risk of suicidal behavior, but may also have reciprocal influences with alcohol drinking patterns. Increased suicide risk may be heralded by social withdrawal, breakdown of social bonds, and social marginalization, which are common outcomes of untreated alcohol abuse and dependence. People with alcohol dependence or depression should be screened for other psychiatric symptoms and for suicidality. Programs for suicide prevention must take into account drinking habits and should reinforce healthy behavioral patterns.

1 January 2016 in Psychoneuroendocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMartino Belvedeti Murri
Martino Belvedeti Murri
DPDavide Prestia
Davide Prestia
VMValeria Mondelli
Valeria Mondelli
CPCarmine Pariante
Carmine Pariante
SPSara Patti
Sara Patti
MAMario Amore
Mario Amore

12 June 2013 in Bipolar Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Maurizio PompiliMaurizio Pompili
Maurizio Pompili
XGXenia Gonda
Xenia Gonda
Gianluca SerafiniGianluca Serafini
Gianluca Serafini
Marco InnamoratiMarco Innamorati
Marco Innamorati
LSLeo Sher
Leo Sher
PGPaolo Girardi
Paolo Girardi