Justin Tan

Dr. Justin Tan

university of british columbia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 January 2018 in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Justin TanJustin Tan
Justin Tan
AKA Kan
A Kan
JHJ Hitkari
J Hitkari
BTB Taylor
B Taylor
NTN Tallon
N Tallon
GNG Nakhuda
G Nakhuda

1 June 2019 in Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Justin TanJustin Tan
Justin Tan
OTOmur Taskin
Omur Taskin
AAArianne Albert
Arianne Albert
MBMohamed Ali Bedaiwy
Mohamed Ali Bedaiwy

21 June 2018 in Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ŞHŞafak Hatırnaz
Şafak Hatırnaz
BABarış Ata
Barış Ata
EHEbru Saynur Hatırnaz
Ebru Saynur Hatırnaz
Michael DahanMichael Dahan
Michael Dahan
STSamer Tannus
Samer Tannus
STSeang Lin Tan
Seang Lin Tan
In vitro maturation (IVM) is one of the most controversial aspects of assisted reproductive technology. Although it has been studied extensively, it is still not a conventional treatment option and is accepted as an alternative treatment. However, studies have shown that IVM can be used in almost all areas where in vitro fertilization (IVF) is used and it has a strong place in fertility protection and Ovarian Hyperstimulation syndrome management. The aim of this systematic review was to address all aspects of the current knowledge of IVM treatment together with the evolution of IVM and IVF.

1 May 2018 in Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Justin TanJustin Tan
Justin Tan
SMSophie Moriarty
Sophie Moriarty
OTOmur Taskin
Omur Taskin
CACatherine Allaire
Catherine Allaire
CWChristina Williams
Christina Williams
MBMohamed Ali Bedaiwy
Mohamed Ali Bedaiwy

1 June 2018 in Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MIMahmoud Iews
Mahmoud Iews
Justin TanJustin Tan
Justin Tan
OTOmur Taskin
Omur Taskin
SASukainah Alfaraj
Sukainah Alfaraj
FAFaten F. AbdelHafez
Faten F. AbdelHafez
MBMohamed Ali Bedaiwy
Mohamed Ali Bedaiwy

18 January 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Justin TanJustin Tan
Justin Tan
MCMaria Cerrillo
Maria Cerrillo
MCMaria Cruz
Maria Cruz
GCGustavo Nardini Cecchino
Gustavo Nardini Cecchino
JGJuan Garcia-Velasco
Juan Garcia-Velasco
Given the estrogen-dependence associated with endometriosis, hyper-stimulation associated with assisted reproduction treatment may exacerbate the disease process and adversely affect endometrial receptivity and subsequent implantation. In this way, a freeze-all deferred embryo transfer (ET) approach may benefit patients with endometriosis, although controversy exists regarding the mechanism of endometriosis-associated infertility and benefits of deferred ET on endometrial receptivity. Hence, the purpose of this study was to compare in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in women with endometriosis, diagnosed by histology, undergoing fresh versus deferred-ET after elective cryopreservation. Of the 728 women included, no significant differences were observed in baseline patient characteristics and response to gonadotrophin stimulation between fresh and deferred ET groups. Furthermore, no significant differences in implantation rate (49.7 vs. 49.9%, p = 0.73), clinical pregnancy rate (40.9 vs. 39.9%, p = 0.49), and miscarriage rate (9.4 vs. 9.9%, p = 0.63) were observed between fresh and deferred ET groups, respectively. Hence, contrary to previous studies, our results suggest that a deferred ET “freeze-all” IVF strategy does not improve early pregnancy outcomes among women with endometriosis. However, prospective studies are required to validate these findings and further insight into the etiology and pathogenesis of endometriosis-associated infertility are necessary to optimize IVF protocols in this population.