Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a decline in cognitive function and neuronal damage. Although the precise pathobiology of AD remains elusive, accumulating evidence suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction is one of the underlying causes of AD. Mutations in mitochondrial or nuclear DNA that encode mitochondrial components may cause mitochondrial dysfunction. In particular, the dysfunction of electron transport chain complexes, along with the interactions of mitochondrial pathological proteins are associated with mitochondrial dysfunction in AD. Mitochondrial dysfunction causes an imbalance in the production of reactive oxygen species, leading to oxidative stress (OS) and vice versa. Neuroinflammation is another potential contributory factor that induces mitochondrial dysfunction. Phytochemicals or other natural compounds have the potential to scavenge oxygen free radicals and enhance cellular antioxidant defense systems, thereby protecting against OS-mediated cellular damage. Phytochemicals can also modulate other cellular processes, including autophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis. Therefore, pharmacological intervention via neuroprotective phytochemicals can be a potential strategy to combat mitochondrial dysfunction as well as AD. This review focuses on the role of phytochemicals in mitigating mitochondrial dysfunction in the pathogenesis of AD.

Insulin potently promotes cell proliferation and anabolic metabolism along with a reduction in blood glucose levels. Pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) plays a pivotal role in glucose metabolism. Insulin increase PDH activity by attenuating phosphorylated Ser293 PDH E1α (p-PDHA1) in normal liver tissue. In contrast to normal hepatocytes, insulin enhanced p-PDHA1 level and induced proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells. Here, we attempted to find a novel function of p-PDHA1 in tumorigenesis upon insulin stimulation. We found that p-Ser293 E1α, but not the E2 or E3 subunit of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC), co-immunoprecipitated with pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) upon insulin. Of note, the p-PDHA1 along with PKM2 translocated to the nucleus. The p-PDHA1/PKM2 complex was associated with the promoter of long intergenic non-protein coding (LINC) 00273 gene (LINC00273) and recruited p300 histone acetyl transferase (HAT) and ATP citrate lyase (ACL), leading to histone acetylation. Consequently, the level of transcription factor ZEB1, an epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) marker, was promoted through increased levels of LINC00273, resulting in cell migration upon insulin. p-PDHA1, along with PKM2, may be crucial for transcriptional regulation of specific genes through epigenetic regulation upon insulin in hepatocarcinoma cells.

Insulin is a crucial signalling molecule that primarily functions to reduce blood glucose levels through cellular uptake of glucose. In addition to its role in glucose homeostasis, insulin has been shown to regulate cell proliferation. Specifically, insulin enhances the phosphorylation of pyruvate dehydrogenase E1α (PDHA1) at the Ser293 residue and promotes the proliferation of HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Furthermore, we previously observed that p-Ser293 PDHA1 bound with pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) as confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation. In this study, we used an in silico analysis to predict the structural conformation of the two binding proteins. However, the function of the protein complex remained unclear. To investigate further, we treated cells with si-PDHA1 and si-PKM2, which led to a reduction in PKM2 and p-Ser293 PDHA1 levels, respectively. Additionally, we found that the PDHA S293A dephospho-mimic reduced PKM2 levels and its associated enzyme activity. Treatment with MG132 and leupeptin impeded the PDHA1 S293A-mediated PKM2 reduction. These results suggest that the association between p-PDHA1 and PKM2 promotes their stability and protects them from protein degradation. Of interest, we observed that p-PDHA1 and PKM2 were localized in the nucleus in liver cancer patients. Under insulin stimulation, the knockdown of both PDHA1 and PKM2 led to a reduction in the expression of common genes, including KDMB1. These findings suggest that p-PDHA1 and PKM2 play a regulatory role in these proteins’ expression and induce tumorigenesis in response to insulin.