Zhichao Miao

Dr. Zhichao Miao

1. Guangzhou Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou 510005, China
+2
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 August 2019 in Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KPKrzysztof Polański
Krzysztof Polański
MYMatthew D Young
Matthew D Young
Zhichao MiaoZhichao Miao
Zhichao Miao
KMKerstin B Meyer
Kerstin B Meyer
STSarah A Teichmann
Sarah A Teichmann
JPJong-Eun Park
Jong-Eun Park
Increasing numbers of large scale single cell RNA-Seq projects are leading to a data explosion, which can only be fully exploited through data integration. A number of methods have been developed to combine diverse datasets by removing technical batch effects, but most are computationally intensive. To overcome the challenge of enormous datasets, we have developed BBKNN, an extremely fast graph-based data integration algorithm. We illustrate the power of BBKNN on large scale mouse atlasing data, and favourably benchmark its run time against a number of competing methods. BBKNN is available at https://github.com/Teichlab/bbknn, along with documentation and multiple example notebooks, and can be installed from pip. Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

9 October 2019 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DPDorin-Mirel Popescu
Dorin-Mirel Popescu
RBRachel A. Botting
Rachel A. Botting
ESEmily Stephenson
Emily Stephenson
KGKile Green
Kile Green
SWSimone Webb
Simone Webb
MHMuzlifah Haniffa
Muzlifah Haniffa

20 December 2018 in Nature Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMaren Büttner
Maren Büttner
Zhichao MiaoZhichao Miao
Zhichao Miao
FWF. Alexander Wolf
F. Alexander Wolf
STSarah A. Teichmann
Sarah A. Teichmann
FTFabian J. Theis
Fabian J. Theis

24 November 2021 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPablo Moreno
Pablo Moreno
SFSilvie Fexova
Silvie Fexova
NGNancy George
Nancy George
JMJonathan R Manning
Jonathan R Manning
Zhichao MiaoZhichao Miao
Zhichao Miao
IPIrene Papatheodorou
Irene Papatheodorou
The EMBL-EBI Expression Atlas is an added value knowledge base that enables researchers to answer the question of where (tissue, organism part, developmental stage, cell type) and under which conditions (disease, treatment, gender, etc) a gene or protein of interest is expressed. Expression Atlas brings together data from >4500 expression studies from >65 different species, across different conditions and tissues. It makes these data freely available in an easy to visualise form, after expert curation to accurately represent the intended experimental design, re-analysed via standardised pipelines that rely on open-source community developed tools. Each study's metadata are annotated using ontologies. The data are re-analyzed with the aim of reproducing the original conclusions of the underlying experiments. Expression Atlas is currently divided into Bulk Expression Atlas and Single Cell Expression Atlas. Expression Atlas contains data from differential studies (microarray and bulk RNA-Seq) and baseline studies (bulk RNA-Seq and proteomics), whereas Single Cell Expression Atlas is currently dedicated to Single Cell RNA-Sequencing (scRNA-Seq) studies. The resource has been in continuous development since 2009 and it is available at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa.

16 April 2015 in RNA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Zhichao MiaoZhichao Miao
Zhichao Miao
RARyszard W. Adamiak
Ryszard W. Adamiak
MBMarc-Frédérick Blanchet
Marc-Frédérick Blanchet
MBMichal Boniecki
Michal Boniecki
JBJanusz M. Bujnicki
Janusz M. Bujnicki
EWEric Westhof
Eric Westhof
This paper is a report of a second round of RNA-Puzzles, a collective and blind experiment in three-dimensional (3D) RNA structure prediction. Three puzzles, Puzzles 5, 6, and 10, represented sequences of three large RNA structures with limited or no homology with previously solved RNA molecules. A lariat-capping ribozyme, as well as riboswitches complexed to adenosylcobalamin and tRNA, were predicted by seven groups using RNAComposer, ModeRNA/SimRNA, Vfold, Rosetta, DMD, MC-Fold, 3dRNA, and AMBER refinement. Some groups derived models using data from state-of-the-art chemical-mapping methods (SHAPE, DMS, CMCT, and mutate-and-map). The comparisons between the predictions and the three subsequently released crystallographic structures, solved at diffraction resolutions of 2.5–3.2 Å, were carried out automatically using various sets of quality indicators. The comparisons clearly demonstrate the state of present-day de novo prediction abilities as well as the limitations of these state-of-the-art methods. All of the best prediction models have similar topologies to the native structures, which suggests that computational methods for RNA structure prediction can already provide useful structural information for biological problems. However, the prediction accuracy for non-Watson–Crick interactions, key to proper folding of RNAs, is low and some predicted models had high Clash Scores. These two difficulties point to some of the continuing bottlenecks in RNA structure prediction. All submitted models are available for download at http://ahsoka.u-strasbg.fr/rnapuzzles/.

30 January 2017 in RNA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Zhichao MiaoZhichao Miao
Zhichao Miao
RARyszard W. Adamiak
Ryszard W. Adamiak
MAMaciej Antczak
Maciej Antczak
RBRobert Batey
Robert Batey
ABAlexander J. Becka
Alexander J. Becka
EWEric Westhof
Eric Westhof
RNA-Puzzles is a collective experiment in blind 3D RNA structure prediction. We report here a third round of RNA-Puzzles. Five puzzles, 4, 8, 12, 13, 14, all structures of riboswitch aptamers and puzzle 7, a ribozyme structure, are included in this round of the experiment. The riboswitch structures include biological binding sites for small molecules (S-adenosyl methionine, cyclic diadenosine monophosphate, 5-amino 4-imidazole carboxamide riboside 5′-triphosphate, glutamine) and proteins (YbxF), and one set describes large conformational changes between ligand-free and ligand-bound states. The Varkud satellite ribozyme is the most recently solved structure of a known large ribozyme. All puzzles have established biological functions and require structural understanding to appreciate their molecular mechanisms. Through the use of fast-track experimental data, including multidimensional chemical mapping, and accurate prediction of RNA secondary structure, a large portion of the contacts in 3D have been predicted correctly leading to similar topologies for the top ranking predictions. Template-based and homology-derived predictions could predict structures to particularly high accuracies. However, achieving biological insights from de novo prediction of RNA 3D structures still depends on the size and complexity of the RNA. Blind computational predictions of RNA structures already appear to provide useful structural information in many cases. Similar to the previous RNA-Puzzles Round II experiment, the prediction of non-Watson–Crick interactions and the observed high atomic clash scores reveal a notable need for an algorithm of improvement. All prediction models and assessment results are available at http://ahsoka.u-strasbg.fr/rnapuzzles/.