Elena Ramírez-Parra

Dr. Elena Ramírez-Parra

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 March 2012 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HSHume Stroud
Hume Stroud
SOSofía Otero
Sofía Otero
BDBénédicte Desvoyes
Bénédicte Desvoyes
ERElena Ramírez-Parra
Elena Ramírez-Parra
Steven E. JacobsenSteven E. Jacobsen
Steven E. Jacobsen
CGCrisanto Gutierrez
Crisanto Gutierrez
Nucleosomes package eukaryotic DNA and are composed of four different histone proteins, designated H3, H4, H2A, and H2B. Histone H3 has two main variants, H3.1 and H3.3, which show different genomic localization patterns in animals. We profiled H3.1 and H3.3 variants in the genome of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana and found that the localization of these variants shows broad similarity in plants and animals, along with some unique features. H3.1 was enriched in silent areas of the genome, including regions containing the repressive chromatin modifications H3 lysine 27 methylation, H3 lysine 9 methylation, and DNA methylation. In contrast, H3.3 was enriched in actively transcribed genes, especially peaking at the 3′ end of genes, and correlated with histone modifications associated with gene activation, such as histone H3 lysine 4 methylation and H2B ubiquitylation, as well as RNA Pol II occupancy. Surprisingly, both H3.1 and H3.3 were enriched on defined origins of replication, as was overall nucleosome density, suggesting a novel characteristic of plant origins. Our results are broadly consistent with the hypothesis that H3.1 acts as the canonical histone that is incorporated during DNA replication, whereas H3.3 acts as the replacement histone that can be incorporated outside of S-phase during chromatin-disrupting processes like transcription.

28 September 2015 in Journal of Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJ. Carlos del Pozo
J. Carlos del Pozo
ERElena Ramírez-Parra
Elena Ramírez-Parra
Polyploidy is a common event in plants that involves the acquisition of more than two complete sets of chromosomes. Allopolyploidy originates from interspecies hybrids while autopolyploidy originates from intraspecies whole genome duplication (WGD) events. In spite of inconveniences derived from chromosomic rearrangement during polyploidization, natural plant polyploids species often exhibit improved growth vigour and adaptation to adverse environments, conferring evolutionary advantages. These advantages have also been incorporated into crop breeding programmes. Many tetraploid crops show increased stress tolerance, although the molecular mechanisms underlying these different adaptation abilities are poorly known. Understanding the physiological, cellular, and molecular mechanisms coupled to WGD, in both allo- and autopolyploidy, is a major challenge. Over the last few years, several studies, many of them in Arabidopsis, are shedding light on the basis of genetic, genomic, and epigenomic changes linked to WGD. In this review we summarize and discuss the latest advances made in Arabidopsis polyploidy, but also in other agronomic plant species.

16 December 2005 in Plant Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BDBénÉdIcte Desvoyes
BénÉdIcte Desvoyes
ERElena Ramírez-Parra
Elena Ramírez-Parra
QXQi Xie
Qi Xie
NCNam-Hai Chua
Nam-Hai Chua
CGCrisanto Gutierrez
Crisanto Gutierrez
Organogenesis in plants is almost entirely a postembryonic process. This unique feature implies a strict coupling of cell proliferation and differentiation, including cell division, arrest, cell cycle reactivation, endoreplication, and differentiation. The plant retinoblastoma-related (RBR) protein modulates the activity of E2F transcription factors to restrict cell proliferation. Arabidopsis contains a single RBR gene, and its loss of function precludes gamete formation and early development. To determine the relevance of the RBR/E2F pathway during organogenesis, outside its involvement in cell division, we have used an inducible system to inactivate RBR function and release E2F activity. Here, we have focused on leaves where cell proliferation and differentiation are temporally and developmentally regulated. Our results reveal that RBR restricts cell division early during leaf development when cell proliferation predominates, while it regulates endocycle occurrence at later stages. Moreover, shortly after leaving the cell cycle, most of leaf epidermal pavement cells retain the ability to reenter the cell cycle and proliferate, but maintain epidermal cell fate. On the contrary, mesophyll cells in the inner layers do not respond in this way to RBR loss of activity. We conclude that there exists a distinct response of different cells to RBR inactivation in terms of maintaining the balance between cell division and endoreplication during Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) leaf development.

9 April 2014 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJ. Carlos del Pozo
J. Carlos del Pozo
ERElena Ramírez-Parra
Elena Ramírez-Parra

1 December 2002 in Current Opinion in Plant Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CGCrisanto Gutierrez
Crisanto Gutierrez
ERElena Ramírez-Parra
Elena Ramírez-Parra
MCM. Mar Castellano
M. Mar Castellano
JPJ. Carlos del Pozo
J. Carlos del Pozo

28 February 2003 in The Plant Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ERElena Ramírez-Parra
Elena Ramírez-Parra
CFCorinne Fründt
Corinne Fründt
CGCrisanto Gutierrez
Crisanto Gutierrez
Summary: The completion of the Arabidopsis genomic sequence offers the possibility to extract global information about regulatory mechanisms. Here, we describe a data mining strategy in combination with gene expression analysis to identify bona fide genes regulated by the E2F transcription factor. Starting with a genome‐wide search of chromosomal sites containing E2F‐binding sites, we studied in depth two of the most abundant E2F‐binding sites within the Arabidopsis genome and identified over 180 potential E2F target genes. Among them and in addition to cell cycle‐related genes, we have also identified genes belonging to other functional categories, e.g. transcription, stress and defense or signaling. We have determined the expression levels of genes selected from different categories under two experimental situations. Using cultured cells partially synchronized with aphidicolin, we found that most potential E2F targets identified in silico show a cell cycle‐regulated expression pattern with a peak in early/mid S‐phase. In addition, we used Arabidopsis transgenic plants expressing a DP gene containing a truncated DNA‐binding domain, which likely has a dominant‐negative effect on AtE2Fa, b and c (also named AtE2F3, 1 and 2, respectively), which require DP for efficient DNA binding. Contrary to the up‐regulation observed in early/mid S‐phase‐cultured cells, the expression of a large number of potential E2F targets was decreased in the transgenic plants. Our results strongly support that the RBR/E2F pathway plays a crucial role in regulating the expression of the genes identified in this study.