Tomasz Nowak

Dr. Tomasz Nowak

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2013 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TNTomasz Nowak
Tomasz Nowak
JJJerzy Jasieńko
Jerzy Jasieńko
DCDariusz Czepiżak
Dariusz Czepiżak

1 January 2016 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TNTomasz Nowak
Tomasz Nowak
JJJerzy Jasieńko
Jerzy Jasieńko
KHKatarzyna Hamrol-Bielecka
Katarzyna Hamrol-Bielecka

1 July 2014 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JJJerzy Jasieńko
Jerzy Jasieńko
TNTomasz Nowak
Tomasz Nowak

7 February 2009 in Materials and Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LJLudomir J. Jankowski
Ludomir J. Jankowski
JJJerzy Jasieńko
Jerzy Jasieńko
TNTomasz Nowak
Tomasz Nowak

13 April 2021 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TNTomasz Nowak
Tomasz Nowak
FPFilip Patalas
Filip Patalas
AKAnna Karolak
Anna Karolak
The paper presents and discusses selected methods of wood classification and the evaluation of its mechanical properties. Attention was mainly paid to methods that may be particularly useful for examining existing elements and structures. The possibility of estimating the modulus of rupture—MOR and modulus of elasticity—MOE based on the non- destructive (NDT), semi-destructive (SDT), and destructive tests (DT) were considered. Known international, European, and American standards and research approaches were indicated. The selected testing methods and their interpretation were presented. These were, among others, the method of visual assessment, the resistance drilling method, methods of determining the dynamic modulus of elasticity, and procedures for testing small clear specimens. Moreover, some of our own research results from the conducted experimental tests were presented and discussed. In the destructive tests, both large elements and small clear specimens were examined. The results obtained from individual methods were compared and some conclusions were presented. The summary discusses the fundamental difficulties and limitations in applying the presented procedures and interpretations.

1 May 2014 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TLThomas Lechner
Thomas Lechner
TNTomasz Nowak
Tomasz Nowak
RKRobert Kliger
Robert Kliger