Ana M. Mota

Prof. Dr. Ana M. Mota

Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 June 2024 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ana M. MotaAna M. Mota
Ana M. Mota
João MendesJoão Mendes
João Mendes
Nuno MatelaNuno Matela
Nuno Matela
Breast cancer remains a leading cause of mortality among women, with molecular subtypes significantly influencing prognosis and treatment strategies. Currently, identifying the molecular subtype of cancer requires a biopsy—a specialized, expensive, and time-consuming procedure, often yielding to results that must be supported with additional biopsies due to technique errors or tumor heterogeneity. This study introduces a novel approach for predicting breast cancer molecular subtypes using mammography images and advanced artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies. Using the OPTIMAM imaging database, 1397 images from 660 patients were selected. The pretrained deep learning model ResNet-101 was employed to classify tumors into five subtypes: Luminal A, Luminal B1, Luminal B2, HER2, and Triple Negative. Various classification strategies were studied: binary classifications (one vs. all others, specific combinations) and multi-class classification (evaluating all subtypes simultaneously). To address imbalanced data, strategies like oversampling, undersampling, and data augmentation were explored. Performance was evaluated using accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Binary classification results showed a maximum average accuracy and AUC of 79.02% and 64.69%, respectively, while multi-class classification achieved an average AUC of 60.62% with oversampling and data augmentation. The most notable binary classification was HER2 vs. non-HER2, with an accuracy of 89.79% and an AUC of 73.31%. Binary classification for specific combinations of subtypes revealed an accuracy of 76.42% for HER2 vs. Luminal A and an AUC of 73.04% for HER2 vs. Luminal B1. These findings highlight the potential of mammography-based AI for non-invasive breast cancer subtype prediction, offering a promising alternative to biopsies and paving the way for personalized treatment plans.

29 August 2022 in Journal of Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ana M. MotaAna M. Mota
Ana M. Mota
MCMatthew J. Clarkson
Matthew J. Clarkson
PAPedro Almeida
Pedro Almeida
Nuno MatelaNuno Matela
Nuno Matela
Microcalcification clusters (MCs) are among the most important biomarkers for breast cancer, especially in cases of nonpalpable lesions. The vast majority of deep learning studies on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) are focused on detecting and classifying lesions, especially soft-tissue lesions, in small regions of interest previously selected. Only about 25% of the studies are specific to MCs, and all of them are based on the classification of small preselected regions. Classifying the whole image according to the presence or absence of MCs is a difficult task due to the size of MCs and all the information present in an entire image. A completely automatic and direct classification, which receives the entire image, without prior identification of any regions, is crucial for the usefulness of these techniques in a real clinical and screening environment. The main purpose of this work is to implement and evaluate the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) regarding an automatic classification of a complete DBT image for the presence or absence of MCs (without any prior identification of regions). In this work, four popular deep CNNs are trained and compared with a new architecture proposed by us. The main task of these trainings was the classification of DBT cases by absence or presence of MCs. A public database of realistic simulated data was used, and the whole DBT image was taken into account as input. DBT data were considered without and with preprocessing (to study the impact of noise reduction and contrast enhancement methods on the evaluation of MCs with CNNs). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance. Very promising results were achieved with a maximum AUC of 94.19% for the GoogLeNet. The second-best AUC value was obtained with a new implemented network, CNN-a, with 91.17%. This CNN had the particularity of also being the fastest, thus becoming a very interesting model to be considered in other studies. With this work, encouraging outcomes were achieved in this regard, obtaining similar results to other studies for the detection of larger lesions such as masses. Moreover, given the difficulty of visualizing the MCs, which are often spread over several slices, this work may have an important impact on the clinical analysis of DBT images.

15 May 2015 in Medical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ana M. MotaAna M. Mota
Ana M. Mota
Nuno MatelaNuno Matela
Nuno Matela
NONuno Oliveira
Nuno Oliveira
PAPedro Almeida
Pedro Almeida

1 August 2016 in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NON. Oliveira
N. Oliveira
Ana M. MotaAna M. Mota
Ana M. Mota
Nuno MatelaNuno Matela
Nuno Matela
LJL. Janeiro
L. Janeiro
PAPedro Almeida
Pedro Almeida

4 September 2024 in Journal of Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Manon BakkerManon Bakker
Manon Bakker
MOMaria de Lurdes Ovalho
Maria de Lurdes Ovalho
Nuno MatelaNuno Matela
Nuno Matela
Ana M. MotaAna M. Mota
Ana M. Mota
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. The therapy used and its success depend highly on the histology of the tumor. This study aimed to explore the potential of predicting the molecular subtype of breast cancer using radiomic features extracted from screening digital mammography (DM) images. A retrospective study was performed using the OPTIMAM Mammography Image Database (OMI-DB). Four binary classification tasks were performed: luminal A vs. non-luminal A, luminal B vs. non-luminal B, TNBC vs. non-TNBC, and HER2 vs. non-HER2. Feature selection was carried out by Pearson correlation and LASSO. The support vector machine (SVM) and naive Bayes (NB) ML classifiers were used, and their performance was evaluated with the accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A total of 186 patients were included in the study: 58 luminal A, 35 luminal B, 52 TNBC, and 41 HER2. The SVM classifier resulted in AUCs during testing of 0.855 for luminal A, 0.812 for luminal B, 0.789 for TNBC, and 0.755 for HER2, respectively. The NB classifier showed AUCs during testing of 0.714 for luminal A, 0.746 for luminal B, 0.593 for TNBC, and 0.714 for HER2. The SVM classifier outperformed NB with statistical significance for luminal A (p = 0.0268) and TNBC (p = 0.0073). Our study showed the potential of radiomics for non-invasive breast cancer subtype classification.

21 October 2025 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ana M. MotaAna M. Mota
Ana M. Mota
Background: Biopsy remains the gold standard for characterizing breast cancer, but it is invasive, costly, and may not fully capture tumor heterogeneity. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) now allow for the extraction of biological and clinical information from medical images, raising the possibility of using imaging as a non-invasive alternative. Methods: A semi-systematic review was conducted to identify AI-based approaches applied to mammography (MM) and breast tomosynthesis (BT) for tumor subtyping, staging, and prognosis. A PubMed search retrieved 1091 articles, of which 81 studies met inclusion criteria (63 MM, 18 BT). Studies were analyzed by clinical target, modality, AI pipeline, number of cases, dataset type, and performance metrics (AUC, accuracy, or C-index). Results: Most studies focused on tumor subtyping, particularly receptor status and molecular classification. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) was frequently used in radiomics pipelines, while end-to-end deep learning (DL) approaches were increasingly applied to MM. Deep models achieved strong performance for ER/PR and HER2 status prediction, especially in large datasets. Fewer studies addressed staging or prognosis, but promising results were obtained for axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis and pathological complete response (pCR). Multimodal and longitudinal approaches—especially those combining MM or BT with MRI or ultrasound—show improved accuracy but remain rare. Public datasets were used in only a minority of studies, limiting reproducibility. Conclusions: AI models can predict key tumor characteristics directly from MM and BT, showing promise as non-invasive tools to complement or even replace biopsy. However, challenges remain in terms of generalizability, external validation, and clinical integration. Future work should prioritize standardized annotations, larger multicentric datasets, and integration of histological or transcriptomic validation to ensure robustness and real-world applicability.