Yili Yang

Dr. Yili Yang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in Theranostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XXXin Xu
Xin Xu
AHAiwen Huang
Aiwen Huang
XCXimao Cui
Ximao Cui
KHKunkun Han
Kunkun Han
XHXiaodan Hou
Xiaodan Hou
YYYili Yang
Yili Yang
Ubiquitin specific peptidase 5 (USP5) is a ubiquitous expressed deubiquitinating enzyme (DUB). It has been shown involved in DNA repair, apoptosis, inflammation, and tumor cell growth. However, the function and molecular mechanism of USP5 in colorectal cancer (CRC) are still unclear. In the present study, we asked how it affected the growth of colorectal cancer cells.

18 December 2019 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XXXin Xu
Xin Xu
SLShaoyan Li
Shaoyan Li
XCXimao Cui
Ximao Cui
KHKunkun Han
Kunkun Han
JWJun Wang
Jun Wang
YYYili Yang
Yili Yang
Mutations and altered expression of deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) have been found associated with many human diseases including cancers. In this study, Ubiquitin specific protease 1 (USP1) expression was found significantly increased in some colorectal cancers (CRC). The elevated USP1 level was associated with short overall survival of patients and with advanced stages of cancers. In cultured CRC cells, knockdown of USP1 induced growth arrest at G2/M of cell cycle and reduced the expression of anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Mcl-1. Its knockdown also led to reduction of DNA-repair related substrates FANCD2 and ID1. Further investigations found that small molecular inhibitor of USP1 ML323 sensitized CRC cells to DNA-targeting chemotherapeutics, including doxorubicin, TOPI/II inhibitors, and PARP inhibitor, but not to 5-Fu. These results indicate that USP1 plays a critical in colorectal cancer cell survival and is a promising target for anti-colorectal cancer chemotherapy. Targeting USP1 may represent an effective strategy to regulate the DNA-repairing system.

23 September 2021 in Frontiers in Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XHXiaodan Hou
Xiaodan Hou
JXJun Xia
Jun Xia
YFYuan Feng
Yuan Feng
LCLong Cui
Long Cui
YYYili Yang
Yili Yang
XXXin Xu
Xin Xu
The ubiquitin–proteasome system regulates a variety of cellular processes including growth, differentiation and apoptosis. While E1, E2, and E3 are responsible for the conjugation of ubiquitin to substrates, deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) reverse the process to remove ubiquitin and edit ubiquitin chains, which have profound effects on substrates’ degradation, localization, and activities. In the present study, we found that the deubiquitinating enzyme USP47 was markedly decreased in primary colorectal cancers (CRC). Its reduced expression was associated with shorter disease-free survival of CRC patients. In cultured CRC cells, knockdown of USP47 increased pyroptosis and apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic doxorubicin. We found that USP47 was able to bind with transcription elongation factor a3 (TCEA3) and regulated its deubiquitination and intracellular level. While ectopic expression of USP47 increased cellular TCEA3 and resistance to doxorubicin, the effect was markedly attenuated by TCEA3 knockdown. Further analysis showed that the level of pro-apoptotic Bax was regulated by TCEA3. These results indicated that the USP47-TCEA3 axis modulates cell pyroptosis and apoptosis and may serve as a target for therapeutic intervention in CRC.

23 June 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JXJing Xu
Jing Xu
NGNicola Galvanetto
Nicola Galvanetto
JNJihua Nie
Jihua Nie
YYYili Yang
Yili Yang
VTVincent Torre
Vincent Torre
The failure of existing therapies in treating human glioblastoma (GBM) mostly is due to the ability of GBM to infiltrate into healthy regions of the brain; however, the relationship between cell motility and cell mechanics is not well understood. Here, we used atomic force microscopy (AFM), live-cell imaging, and biochemical tools to study the connection between motility and mechanics in human GBM cells. It was found thatRac1 inactivation by genomic silencing and inhibition with EHT 1864 reduced cell motility, inhibited cell ruffles, and disrupted the dynamics of cytoskeleton organization and cell adhesion. These changes were correlated with abnormal localization of myosin IIa and a rapid suppression of the phosphorylation of Erk1/2. At the same time, AFM measurements of the GBM cells revealed a significant increase in cell elasticity and viscosity following Rac1 inhibition. These results indicate that mechanical properties profoundly affect cell motility and may play an important role in the infiltration of GBM. It is conceivable that the mechanical characters might be used as markers for further surgical and therapeutical interventions.

26 August 2021 in The FASEB Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XXXin Xu
Xin Xu
JXJun Xia
Jun Xia
SZShiyi Zhao
Shiyi Zhao
QWQun Wang
Qun Wang
GGGuangbo Ge
Guangbo Ge
YYYili Yang
Yili Yang

18 November 2020 in FEBS Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYaofu Liu
Yaofu Liu
ZTZhenzhi Tan
Zhenzhi Tan
YYYili Yang
Yili Yang
Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is a cell state in which misfolded or unfolded proteins are aberrantly accumulated in the ER. ER stress induces an evolutionarily conserved adaptive response, named the ER stress response, that deploys a self‐regulated machinery to maintain cellular proteostasis. However, compared to its well‐established canonical activation mechanism, the negative feedback mechanisms regulating the ER stress response remain unclear and no accepted methods or markers have been established. Several studies have documented that both endogenous and exogenous insults can induce ER stress in cancer. Based on this evidence, small molecule inhibitors targeting ER stress response have been designed to kill cancer cells, with some of them showing excellent curative effects. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of negative feedback of the ER stress response and compare the markers used to date. We also summarize therapeutic inhibitors targeting ER stress response and highlight the promises and challenges ahead.