Information on the spatiotemporal variability of soil properties and states within the agricultural landscape is vital to identify management zones supporting precision agriculture (PA). Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electromagnetic induction (EMI) techniques have been applied to assess soil properties, states, processes, and their spatiotemporal variability. This paper reviews the fundamental operating principles of GPR and EMI, their applications in soil studies, advantages and disadvantages, and knowledge gaps leading to the identification of the difficulties in integrating these two techniques to complement each other in soil data studies. Compared to the traditional methods, GPR and EMI have advantages, such as the ability to take non-destructive repeated measurements, high resolution, being labor-saving, and having more extensive spatial coverage with geo-referenced data within agricultural landscapes. GPR has been widely used to estimate soil water content (SWC) and water dynamics, while EMI has broader applications such as estimating SWC, soil salinity, bulk density, etc. Additionally, GPR can map soil horizons, the groundwater table, and other anomalies. The prospects of GPR and EMI applications in soil studies need to focus on the potential integration of GPR and EMI to overcome the intrinsic limitations of each technique and enhance their applications to support PA. Future advancements in PA can be strengthened by estimating many soil properties, states, and hydrological processes simultaneously to delineate management zones and calculate optimal inputs in the agricultural landscape.

Ground-penetrating radars operating at a stand-off distance from the probed domain are attractive diagnostic tools in several contexts. Despite notable advantages offered in terms of noninvasiveness and flexibility, the usage of stand-off configurations makes the imaging process more difficult. Indeed, an accurate reconstruction of the subsurface/hidden scene requires accounting for the presence of the air-soil interface into the scattering model. This article deals with a comparison of three different linear models for describing the scattering phenomenon under a stand-off configuration, where the presence of the layered medium is explicitly accounted for in the scattering model. The first model is rigorous and based on the spectral domain representation of the incident field and Green's function for the half-space scenario. The second model exploits a ray representation of the wave propagation from the radar to the target and vice versa by accounting for the refraction phenomenon at the interface. The third model is an approximated one, where the layered nature of the scenario is taken into account by means of an equivalent wavenumber, which allows a straightforward evaluation of the incident field and Green's function. The resolution performance of each inversion approach is assessed by means of a numerical analysis. Moreover, data referred to an experiment carried out in controlled conditions are processed and reconstructions are provided to support the comparative analysis among the three imaging approaches.