Andreas Jossen

Prof. Andreas Jossen

Institute for Electrical Energy Storage Technology (EES), Technical University München (TUM), Arcisstrasse 21, 80333 Munich, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2001 in Journal of Power Sources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPSabine Piller
Sabine Piller
MPMarion Perrin
Marion Perrin
Andreas JossenAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen

11 December 2017 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Holger HesseHolger Hesse
Holger Hesse
MSMichael Schimpe
Michael Schimpe
DKDaniel Kucevic
Daniel Kucevic
Andreas JossenAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen
Battery energy storage systems have gained increasing interest for serving grid support in various application tasks. In particular, systems based on lithium-ion batteries have evolved rapidly with a wide range of cell technologies and system architectures available on the market. On the application side, different tasks for storage deployment demand distinct properties of the storage system. This review aims to serve as a guideline for best choice of battery technology, system design and operation for lithium-ion based storage systems to match a specific system application. Starting with an overview to lithium-ion battery technologies and their characteristics with respect to performance and aging, the storage system design is analyzed in detail based on an evaluation of real-world projects. Typical storage system applications are grouped and classified with respect to the challenges posed to the battery system. Publicly available modeling tools for technical and economic analysis are presented. A brief analysis of optimization approaches aims to point out challenges and potential solution techniques for system sizing, positioning and dispatch operation. For all areas reviewed herein, expected improvements and possible future developments are highlighted. In order to extract the full potential of stationary battery storage systems and to enable increased profitability of systems, future research should aim to a holistic system level approach combining not only performance tuning on a battery cell level and careful analysis of the application requirements, but also consider a proper selection of storage sub-components as well as an optimized system operation strategy.

6 July 2016 in Journal of the Electrochemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PKPeter Keil
Peter Keil
SSSimon F. Schuster
Simon F. Schuster
JWJörn Wilhelm
Jörn Wilhelm
JTJulian Travi
Julian Travi
AHAndreas Hauser
Andreas Hauser
Andreas JossenAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen
In this study, the calendar aging of lithium-ion batteries is investigated at different temperatures for 16 states of charge (SoCs) from 0 to 100%. Three types of 18650 lithium-ion cells, containing different cathode materials, have been examined. Our study demonstrates that calendar aging does not increase steadily with the SoC. Instead, plateau regions, covering SoC intervals of more than 20%–30% of the cell capacity, are observed wherein the capacity fade is similar. Differential voltage analyses confirm that the capacity fade is mainly caused by a shift in the electrode balancing. Furthermore, our study reveals the high impact of the graphite electrode on calendar aging. Lower anode potentials, which aggravate electrolyte reduction and thus promote solid electrolyte interphase growth, have been identified as the main driver of capacity fade during storage. In the high SoC regime where the graphite anode is lithiated more than 50%, the low anode potential accelerates the loss of cyclable lithium, which in turn distorts the electrode balancing. Aging mechanisms induced by high cell potential, such as electrolyte oxidation or transition-metal dissolution, seem to play only a minor role. To maximize battery life, high storage SoCs corresponding to low anode potential should be avoided.


1 June 2015 in Journal of Energy Storage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSimon F. Schuster
Simon F. Schuster
TBTobias Bach
Tobias Bach
EFElena Fleder
Elena Fleder
JMJana Müller
Jana Müller
MBMartin Brand
Martin Brand
Andreas JossenAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen

1 March 2006 in Journal of Power Sources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Andreas JossenAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen