Vitamin K is essential for blood coagulation and plays an important role in extrahepatic metabolism, such as in bone and blood vessels, and in energy metabolism. This review discusses the assessment of vitamin K sufficiency and the role of vitamin K in bone health. To elucidate the exact role of vitamin K in other organs, accurate tools for assessing vitamin K deficiency or insufficiency are crucial. Undercarboxylated vitamin K-dependent protein levels can be measured to evaluate tissue-specific vitamin K deficiency/insufficiency. Vitamin K has genomic action through steroid and xenobiotic receptor (SXR); however, the importance of this action requires further study. Recent studies have revealed that the bone-specific, vitamin K-dependent protein osteocalcin has a close relationship with energy metabolism through insulin sensitivity. Among the organs that produce vitamin K-dependent proteins, bone has attracted the most attention, as vitamin K deficiency has been consistently associated with bone fractures. Although vitamin K treatment addresses vitamin K deficiency and is believed to promote bone health, the corresponding findings on fracture risk reduction are conflicting. We also discuss the similarity of other vitamin supplementations on fracture risk. Future clinical studies are needed to further elucidate the effect of vitamin K on fracture risk.
1 December 2020 in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Summary Intestinal fractional calcium absorption (FCA) was assessed before and after vitamin D3 treatment. Serum 1,25(OH)2D concentration was significantly increased by plain vitamin D3 and reduced by eldecalcitol. The 1α hydroxyl calcidiol and eldecalcitol treatments increased FCA, which may be induced through direct stimulation of vitamin D receptors in the intestine. Introduction To assess the effects of vitamin D3 compounds on intestinal FCA and calcium-regulating hormones in post-menopausal osteoporosis, a randomized open-label prospective study was conducted. Methods Forty eligible patients were allocated randomly into four groups: eldecalcitol (ELD; 0.75 μg/day), 1α hydroxyl calcidiol (ALF; 1 μg/day), plain vitamin D3 (800 IU/day), and control. Before and after the 4-week treatment, intestinal FCA was estimated by using a double isotope method, and serum concentrations of calcium-regulating hormones and a bone turnover marker were measured. Results The baseline FCA value of the participants was 21.5 ± 7.9% (mean ± SD) and was significantly correlated with serum 1,25(OH)2D (calcitriol) concentration. After the treatment, the FCA significantly increased by 59.5% (95% CI, 41.6 to 77.4%) in the ELD group and by 45.9% (27.9 to 63.8%) in the ALF group, whereas no significant change in the plain vitamin D3 group was found. Unlike the baseline FCA, post-treatment FCA exhibited no significant correlation with serum calcitriol concentration. Parathyroid hormone levels were suppressed by ALF and plain vitamin D3 but were sustained in the ELD and control groups. Serum calcitriol tended to be suppressed by ELD, whereas plain vitamin D3 treatment increased both serum 25(OH)D and calcitriol concentrations. Conclusion These findings suggest that oral administration of vitamin D3 analogues (ALF and ELD) stimulates FCA but plain vitamin D3 does not. Those effects of vitamin D3 compounds on FCA were independent of serum calcitriol concentration, suggesting that ALF and ELD may directly stimulate intestinal vitamin D receptors.
Calcium intake may play an important role on bone health. The recent national nutritional survey in Japan revealed the gradual decrease in calcium intake to around 480 mg/day. In addition, the patients with low level of vitamin D become too large in proportion. The present perspective proposes to increase calcium intake in Asian population.
11 January 2013 in Current Medical Research and Opinion
To evaluate fracture risk and bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with primary osteoporosis, 1 year after completing 72 weeks of weekly teriparatide injections. After 72 weeks of teriparatide injections or placebo (original trial), treatment was unblinded and subjects were subsequently treated with bisphosphonates or other therapeutic regimens at the discretion of their physicians and followed for 1 year. Spine radiographs and BMD measurements at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry were performed. Incident vertebral fracture rate. A total of 465 patients were enrolled and 447 (96.1%) completed the study. In the 1 year follow-up period, new morphometric vertebral fractures occurred in 7/203 (3.4%) in the post-teriparatide group and 33/241 (13.7%) in the post-placebo group (relative risk [RR]: 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10 to 0.52, P < 0.05). The cumulative incidences from the start of the original trial were 4.9% and 22.8%, respectively (RR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.36, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in incidences of vertebral fractures between subsequent therapeutic regimens in the post-teriparatide group. In subjects treated with bisphosphonates, mean BMD values further significantly increased by 9.6%, 2.9%, and 4.1% at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip, respectively (P < 0.05). The reduced risk of vertebral fracture was sustained for 1 year after completion of 72 weeks of weekly teriparatide injections. The effects did not differ between subsequent therapeutic regimens. BMD gains continued with sequential bisphosphonate treatment, but not with the other sequential therapeutic regimens. Bisphosphonates seem to be a useful choice as a subsequent treatment to weekly teriparatide. This study was an observational follow-up study and the regimens of subsequent medication after discontinuation of the original TOWER trial were not randomly allocated.