The paper presents the results of measurement thermal diffusivity temperature characteristic of the Titanium Grade 1 (Ti Grade 1, with density 4.34 g/cm³ at RT) in wide temperature range from (-)60 ℃ to (+)1100 ℃. Two kinds of the Netzsch laser flash apparatuses for the measurement of thermal diffusivity and conductivity were used, i.e. the low temperature LFA 467 and the high temperature LFA 427. As a reference material a sample from a stainless steel A310. Reference material was used to verify the test results of thermal diffusivity and to determine the thermal conductivity by the comparative method. The results of the thermal diffusivity tests of the Titanium Grade 1 performed by means of LFA 467 and LFA 427 apparatuses showed to be consistent to each other. In calculation of the thermal diffusivity and thermal conductivity temperature characteristics the influence of thermal expansion of the tested material was taken into account. Tests of temperature characteristics of thermal diffusivity of Ti Grade 1 showed the occurrence of structural change during the first heating at a temperature of about 890 °C. This effect has been confirmed by thermal expansion studies, which were carried out in the range from room temperature (RT) up to 1100 °C using the Netzsch high temperature dilatometer DIL 402.

Commercial paraffin wax used by Bolsius Nederland B.V. for manufacturing various kinds of candles was applied as a phase-change material (PCM) for cooling a 28 W high-power light emitting diode (LED) panel during its operation. The main problem arising during operation of an LED is thermal management. According to the manufacturer’s datasheet specifications (BioSolution Ltd. www.biosolution.pl), the operating temperature range for the LED street lamp UL28W is \((-30~{^{\circ }}\hbox {C})\) to \((+40~{^{\circ }}\hbox {C})\). The object of the present study was an LED panel containing 28 pieces of high-power 1W LEDs connected in series (4 LEDs in each of the 7 rows) mounted on an aluminum plate of dimensions 80 mm by 135 mm. The tested aluminum plate was placed in a block made of aluminum with a hollow compartment containing Bolsius paraffin wax of density \(914~\hbox {kg}\cdot \hbox {m}^{-3}\) at room temperature. Temperatures were recorded using K-type thermocouples at selected locations of the tested LED panel for several values of the power supplied to it, while utilizing PCM and without it. As the manufacturer of Bolsius wax candles does not provide any data on the thermal properties of the material used, it was necessary to carry out micro-calorimetric research. Thermophysical properties of the paraffin wax such as the apparent specific heat, enthalpy of phase transition and temperature of phase change transition during heating and cooling were determined using the Netzsch DSC 214 Polyma. The Netzsch TG 209F3 Tarsus was used for TG/DTG measurements. DSC investigations revealed the following thermal transitions taking place during the first heating: solid–solid transition (onset \(30.4~{^{\circ }}\hbox {C}\), peak at \(40.9~{^{\circ }}\hbox {C}\)), solid–liquid transition (onset \(47.7~{^{\circ }}\hbox {C}\), peak at \(54.9~{^{\circ }}\hbox {C}\), end at \(58.3~{^{\circ }}\hbox {C}\)), latent heat of energy storage \(201~\hbox {J}\cdot \hbox {g}^{-1}\), apparent specific heat corresponding to peak at \(41.5~{^{\circ }}\hbox {C}\) \((5.498~\hbox {J}\cdot \hbox {g}^{-1}\cdot \hbox {K}^{-1})\). DTG investigations revealed that the decomposition of paraffin wax is a two-step process. At \(283~{^{\circ }}\hbox {C}\) there was observed a slightly slower decomposition \((9.43\,\%\cdot \hbox {min}^{-1})\) than that at \(323~{^{\circ }}\hbox {C} (12.5\,\%\cdot \hbox {min}^{-1})\). The experimental results obtained upon cooling the high-power LED lamp during its operation can be applied to verify results of numerical modeling of the heat transfer problems with phase-change transitions. An attempt at modeling such a problem based on 1D fixed grid with variable time step approach was undertaken in this work.

The results of numerical simulations of transient heat transfer in the barrel wall of a 35 mm caliber cannon for a single shot and the sequences of seven shots and sixty shots for chosen barrel steels are presented. It was assumed that the cannon barrel was made of one of the three types of steel: 38HMJ (1.8509), 30HN2MFA and DUPLEX (1.4462). To model the thermal phenomena in the barrel, the barrel wall material was assumed to be homogeneous and the inner surface of the barrel had no protective chromium or nitride layer. The calculations were made for temperature-dependent thermophysical parameters, i.e., thermal conductivity, specific heat and thermal expansion (in the range from RT up to 1000 °C) of the selected barrel steels. A barrel with a total length of 3150 mm was divided into 6 zones (i = 1, …, 6) and in each of them, the heat flux density was calculated as a function of time ${\dot{q}}_i\left(t\right)$ on the inner surface of the barrel. Using lumped parameter methods, an internal ballistic code was developed to compute in each zone the heat transfer coefficient as a function of time h_i(t) and bore gas temperature as a function of time T_g(t) to the cannon barrel for given ammunition parameters. A calculation time equaling 100 ms per single shot was assumed. The results of the calculations were obtained using FEM implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics ver. 5.6 software.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of heat treatments and resulting changes in microstructure on the thermophysical properties of commercial 1.4462 duplex stainless steel. Three types of heat treatment and a raw sample were used. In the first heat treatment, a duplex steel bar was annealed in an air atmosphere furnace for one hour at 1200 °C and then quickly cooled in water (1200 °C + water). The second heat treatment was the same as the first, but afterwards, the bar was annealed in an air atmosphere furnace for 4 h at 800 °C and then slowly cooled down in the furnace to room temperature (1200 °C + water + 800 °C). In the third heat treatment, the duplex steel bar was annealed in the furnace in an air atmosphere for one hour at 900 °C and then slowly cooled in the furnace to room temperature (900 °C). As a result, the weight percentages of ferrite and austenite in the samples achieved the following ratios: 75:25, 65:35 and 44:56. Light microscope examinations (LM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Vickers micro-hardness measurements and thermophysical studies using a laser flash apparatus (LFA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and push-rod dilatometry (DIL) were performed to reveal the microstructure and changes in thermophysical properties including thermal diffusivity, thermal conductivity, thermal expansion and specific heat. Along with presenting these data, the paper, in brief, presents the applied investigation procedures.

In this paper, thermal diffusivity and heat capacity measurements were performed for three types of barrel steel, 38HMJ (1.8509), 30HN2MFA, and duplex (1.4462). Thermal diffusivity tests as a function of temperature were performed in the range of room temperature (RT) to 500 °C, and specific heat in the range of RT to 1000 °C. All tests were carried out using NETZSCH specialized measuring stands: LFA 467 light flash apparatus and DSC 404 F1 Pegasus differential scanning calorimeter. In the measurements of thermal diffusivity, the reference material Inconel 600 was used. This made it possible to determine thermal conductivity and specific heat as a function of the temperature of barrel steel. The results of specific heat tests of the 38HMJ and the 30HN2MFA steels show a ferrite–austenite phase transition in the 750–810 °C temperature range. This transition was not observed in the duplex steel.

Measurements of thermal diffusivity, heat capacity and thermal expansion of X37CrMoV5-1 (1.2343) hot-work tool steel and Maraging 350 (1.6355) steel in the temperature range from −50 °C to 1000 °C were carried out in this paper. Both X37CrMoV5-1 and Maraging 350 are tested for military use as barrel steels. Thermophysical properties were tested using specialised test stands from NETZSCH. Thermal diffusivity was studied using both the LFA 427 laser flash apparatus in the temperature range of RT–1000 °C and the LFA 467 laser flash apparatus in the temperature range of −50 °C–500 °C. Specific heat capacity was investigated using a DSC 404 F1 Pegasus differential scanning calorimeter in the range RT–1000 °C, and thermal expansion was investigated using both a DIL 402 Expedis pushrod dilatometer in the range −50 °C–500 °C and a DIL 402 C in the range RT–1000 °C. Inconel 600 was selected as the reference material during the thermal diffusivity test using LFA467. Tests under the light microscope (LM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Vickers microhardness measurements were carried out to detect changes in the microstructure before and after thermophysical measurements. This paper briefly characterises the research procedures used. In conclusion, the results of testing the thermophysical properties of X37CrMoV5-1 hot-work tool steel and Maraging 350 steel are compared with our results on 38HMJ (1.8509), 30HN2MFA and Duplex (1.4462) barrel steels. The thermophysical properties of X37CrMoV5-1 (1.2343) hot-work tool steel and Maraging 350 (1.6355) steel are incomplete in the literature. The paper presents the thermophysical properties of these steels over a wide range of temperatures so that they can be used as input data for numerical simulations of heat transfer in cannon barrels.