Daniel L Peters

Dr. Daniel L Peters

University of Victoria, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 November 2006 in Hydrological Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Daniel L PetersDaniel L Peters
Daniel L Peters
TPTerry D. Prowse
Terry D. Prowse
APAlain Pietroniro
Alain Pietroniro
RLRobert Leconte
Robert Leconte

22 April 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Laura ChasmerLaura Chasmer
Laura Chasmer
CMCraig Mahoney
Craig Mahoney
Koreen MillardKoreen Millard
Koreen Millard
KNKailyn Nelson
Kailyn Nelson
Daniel L PetersDaniel L Peters
Daniel L Peters
DCDanielle Cobbaert
Danielle Cobbaert
The following review is the second part of a two part series on the use of remotely sensed data for quantifying wetland extent and inferring or measuring condition for monitoring drivers of change on wetland environments. In the first part, we introduce policy makers and non-users of remotely sensed data with an effective feasibility guide on how data can be used. In the current review, we explore the more technical aspects of remotely sensed data processing and analysis using case studies within the literature. Here we describe: (a) current technologies used for wetland assessment and monitoring; (b) the latest algorithmic developments for wetland assessment; (c) new technologies; and (d) a framework for wetland sampling in support of remotely sensed data collection. Results illustrate that high or fine spatial resolution pixels (≤10 m) are critical for identifying wetland boundaries and extent, and wetland class, form and type, but are not required for all wetland sizes. Average accuracies can be up to 11% better (on average) than medium resolution (11–30 m) data pixels when compared with field validation. Wetland size is also a critical factor such that large wetlands may be almost as accurately classified using medium-resolution data (average = 76% accuracy, stdev = 21%). Decision-tree and machine learning algorithms provide the most accurate wetland classification methods currently available, however, these also require sampling of all permutations of variability. Hydroperiod accuracy, which is dependent on instantaneous water extent for single time period datasets does not vary greatly with pixel resolution when compared with field data (average = 87%, 86%) for high and medium resolution pixels, respectively. The results of this review provide users with a guideline for optimal use of remotely sensed data and suggested field methods for boreal and global wetland studies.


1 June 2006 in Wetlands Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Daniel L PetersDaniel L Peters
Daniel L Peters
TPTerry D. Prowse
Terry D. Prowse
PMPhil Marsh
Phil Marsh
PLPeter M. Lafleur
Peter M. Lafleur
JBJames M. Buttle
James M. Buttle

27 February 2013 in Hydrological Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Daniel L PetersDaniel L Peters
Daniel L Peters
DADavid Atkinson
David Atkinson
WMWendy A. Monk
Wendy A. Monk
DTDavid E. Tenenbaum
David E. Tenenbaum
DBDonald J. Baird
Donald J. Baird

22 April 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Laura ChasmerLaura Chasmer
Laura Chasmer
DCDanielle Cobbaert
Danielle Cobbaert
CMCraig Mahoney
Craig Mahoney
Koreen MillardKoreen Millard
Koreen Millard
Daniel L PetersDaniel L Peters
Daniel L Peters
ONOlaf Niemann
Olaf Niemann
Wetlands have and continue to undergo rapid environmental and anthropogenic modification and change to their extent, condition, and therefore, ecosystem services. In this first part of a two-part review, we provide decision-makers with an overview on the use of remote sensing technologies for the ‘wise use of wetlands’, following Ramsar Convention protocols. The objectives of this review are to provide: (1) a synthesis of the history of remote sensing of wetlands, (2) a feasibility study to quantify the accuracy of remotely sensed data products when compared with field data based on 286 comparisons found in the literature from 209 articles, (3) recommendations for best approaches based on case studies, and (4) a decision tree to assist users and policymakers at numerous governmental levels and industrial agencies to identify optimal remote sensing approaches based on needs, feasibility, and cost. We argue that in order for remote sensing approaches to be adopted by wetland scientists, land-use managers, and policymakers, there is a need for greater understanding of the use of remote sensing for wetland inventory, condition, and underlying processes at scales relevant for management and policy decisions. The literature review focuses on boreal wetlands primarily from a Canadian perspective, but the results are broadly applicable to policymakers and wetland scientists globally, providing knowledge on how to best incorporate remotely sensed data into their monitoring and measurement procedures. This is the first review quantifying the accuracy and feasibility of remotely sensed data and data combinations needed for monitoring and assessment. These include, baseline classification for wetland inventory, monitoring through time, and prediction of ecosystem processes from individual wetlands to a national scale.