Domenico Russo

Prof. Domenico Russo

Chair of Hematology, Unit of Blood Diseases and Stem Cell Transplantation, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in Journal of Tissue Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Federica ReFederica Re
Federica Re
Luciana SartoreLuciana Sartore
Luciana Sartore
VMVladimira Moulisova
Vladimira Moulisova
MCMarco Cantini
Marco Cantini
CACamillo Almici
Camillo Almici
Domenico RussoDomenico Russo
Domenico Russo
Bone marrow and adipose tissue human mesenchymal stem cells were seeded in highly performing 3D gelatin–chitosan hybrid hydrogels of varying chitosan content in the presence of human platelet lysate and evaluated for their proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. Both bone marrow and adipose tissue human mesenchymal stem cells in gelatin–chitosan hybrid hydrogel 1 (chitosan content 8.1%) or gelatin–chitosan hybrid hydrogel 2 (chitosan 14.9%) showed high levels of viability (80%–90%), and their proliferation and osteogenic differentiation was significantly higher with human platelet lysate compared to fetal bovine serum, particularly in gelatin–chitosan hybrid hydrogel 1. Mineralization was detected early, after 21 days of culture, when human platelet lysate was used in the presence of osteogenic stimuli. Proteomic characterization of human platelet lysate highlighted 59 proteins mainly involved in functions related to cell adhesion, cellular repairing mechanisms, and regulation of cell differentiation. In conclusion, the combination of our gelatin–chitosan hybrid hydrogels with hPL represents a promising strategy for bone regenerative medicine using human mesenchymal stem cells.

13 June 2013 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CFCarla Filì
Carla Filì
MMMichele Malagola
Michele Malagola
MFMatilde Y. Follo
Matilde Y. Follo
CFCarlo Finelli
Carlo Finelli
IIIlaria Iacobucci
Ilaria Iacobucci
Domenico RussoDomenico Russo
Domenico Russo
Purpose: This phase II prospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5-days azacytidine (5d-AZA) in patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Second, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genetic profile and phosphoinositide-phospholipase C (PI-PLC) β1 levels were studied to evaluate possible biologic markers able to predict the hematologic response. Experimental Design: The study tested a lower intensity schedule of azacytidine. The treatment plan consisted of 75 mg/sqm/d subcutaneous administered for 5 days every 28 days, for a total of 8 cycles. Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study. The overall response rate was 47% (15 of 32) on intention-to-treat and 58% (15 of 26) for patients completing the treatment program. In this latter group, 5 (19%) achieved complete remission (CR) and 10 (38%) had hematologic improvement, according to the International Working Group (IWG) criteria. Three patients have maintained their hematologic improvement after 37, 34, and 33 months without other treatments. Moreover, 21 and 2 of 26 cases completing 8 cycles were transfusion-dependent for red blood cells and platelets at baseline, respectively. Of these, 7 (33%) and 2 (100%) became transfusion-independent at the end of the treatment program, respectively. Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 28% of patients and 4 patients died early due to infections or hemorrhage. SNP results were not significantly correlated to the clinical outcome, whereas PI-PLCβ1 level anticipated either positive or negative clinical responses. Conclusions: 5d-AZA is safe and effective in a proportion of patients with low-risk MDS. PI-PLCβ1 gene expression is a reliable and dynamic marker of response that can be useful to optimize azacytidine therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 19(12); 3297–308. ©2013 AACR.

27 June 2013 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Domenico RussoDomenico Russo
Domenico Russo
GMGiovanni Marconi
Giovanni Marconi
MMMichele Malagola
Michele Malagola
CSCristina Skert
Cristina Skert
Simona SoveriniSimona Soverini
Simona Soverini
MBMichele Baccarani
Michele Baccarani
Key Points: INTERIM treatment affects cytogenetic and molecular response, but not the outcome. No patients treated with INTERIM progressed to accelerated or blast phase.

30 September 2005 in British Journal of Haematology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Domenico RussoDomenico Russo
Domenico Russo
MMMichele Malagola
Michele Malagola
AVAntonio de Vivo
Antonio de Vivo
MFMauro Fiacchini
Mauro Fiacchini
GMGiovanni Martinelli
Giovanni Martinelli
MBMichele Baccarani
Michele Baccarani
Summary: Fludarabine plus cytarabine (Ara‐C) and idarubicin (FLAI) is an effective and well‐tolerated induction regimen for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). This phase III trial compared the efficacy and toxicity of FLAI versus idarubicin plus Ara‐C and etoposide (ICE) in 112 newly diagnosed AML patients <60 years. Fifty‐seven patients received FLAI, as the first induction–remission course, and 55 patients received ICE. Post‐induction treatment consisted of high‐dose Ara‐C (HDAC). After HDAC, patients in complete remission (CR) received a second consolidation course (mitoxantrone, etoposide, Ara‐C) and autologous stem cell transplantation (auto‐SCT) or allogeneic (allo)‐SCT, according to the age, disease risk and donor availability. After a single induction course, CR rate was 74% in the FLAI arm and 51% in the ICE arm (P = 0·01), while death during induction was 2% and 9% respectively. Both haematological (P = 0·002) and non‐haematological (P = 0·0001) toxicities, especially gastrointestinal (i.e. nausea, vomiting, mucositis and diarrhoea), were significantly lower in FLAI arm. In both arms, relapses were more frequent in patients who were not submitted to allo‐SCT. After a median follow‐up of 17 months, 30% and 38% of the patients are in continuous CR in FLAI and ICE arm respectively. Our prospective randomised study confirmed the anti‐leukaemic effect and the low toxic profile of FLAI as induction treatment for newly diagnosed AML patients.

8 May 2023 in Gels
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Federica ReFederica Re
Federica Re
Elisa BorsaniElisa Borsani
Elisa Borsani
Rita RezzaniRita Rezzani
Rita Rezzani
Luciana SartoreLuciana Sartore
Luciana Sartore
Domenico RussoDomenico Russo
Domenico Russo
Bone regenerative medicine is a clinical approach combining live osteoblast progenitors, such as mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), with a biocompatible scaffold that can integrate into host bone tissue and restore its structural integrity. Over the last few years, many tissue engineering strategies have been developed and thoroughly investigated; however, limited approaches have been translated to clinical application. Consequently, the development and clinical validation of regenerative approaches remain a centerpiece of investigational efforts towards the clinical translation of advanced bioengineered scaffolds. The aim of this review was to identify the latest clinical trials related to the use of scaffolds with or without MSCs to regenerate bone defects. A revision of the literature was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov from 2018 up to 2023. Nine clinical trials were analyzed according to the inclusion criteria: six presented in the literature and three reported in Clinicaltrials.gov. Data were extracted covering background trial information. Six of the clinical trials added cells to scaffolds, while three used scaffolds alone. The majority of scaffolds were composed of calcium phosphate ceramic alone, such as β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) (two clinical trials), biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramic granules (three clinical trials), and anorganic bovine bone (two clinical trials), while bone marrow was the primary source of the MSCs (five clinical trials). The MSC expansion was performed in GMP facilities, using human platelet lysate (PL) as a supplement without osteogenic factors. Only one trial reported minor adverse events. Overall, these findings highlight the importance and efficacy of cell–scaffold constructs in regenerative medicine under different conditions. Despite the encouraging clinical results obtained, further studies are needed to assess their clinical efficacy in treating bone diseases to optimize their application.

23 February 2017 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSimone Perucca
Simone Perucca
APAndrea Di Palma
Andrea Di Palma
Pier Paolo PiccalugaPier Paolo Piccaluga
Pier Paolo Piccaluga
CGClaudia Gemelli
Claudia Gemelli
EZElisa Zoratti
Elisa Zoratti
Domenico RussoDomenico Russo
Domenico Russo
A human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell (MSCs) and cord blood-derived CD34+ stem cell co-culture system was set up in order to evaluate the proliferative and differentiative effects induced by MSCs on CD34+ stem cells, and the reciprocal influences on gene expression profiles. After 10 days of co-culture, non-adherent (SN-fraction) and adherent (AD-fraction) CD34+ stem cells were collected and analysed separately. In the presence of MSCs, a significant increase in CD34+ cell number was observed (fold increase = 14.68), mostly in the SN-fraction (fold increase = 13.20). This was combined with a significant increase in CD34+ cell differentiation towards the BFU-E colonies and with a decrease in the CFU-GM. These observations were confirmed by microarray analysis. Through gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), we noted a significant enrichment in genes involved in heme metabolism (e.g. LAMP2, CLCN3, BMP2K), mitotic spindle formation and proliferation (e.g. PALLD, SOS1, CCNA1) and TGF-beta signalling (e.g. ID1) and a down-modulation of genes participating in myeloid and lymphoid differentiation (e.g. PCGF2) in the co-cultured CD34+ stem cells. On the other hand, a significant enrichment in genes involved in oxygen-level response (e.g. TNFAIP3, SLC2A3, KLF6) and angiogenesis (e.g. VEGFA, IGF1, ID1) was found in the co-cultured MSCs. Taken together, our results suggest that MSCs can exert a priming effect on CD34+ stem cells, regulating their proliferation and erythroid differentiation. In turn, CD34+ stem cells seem to be able to polarise the BM-niche towards the vascular compartment by modulating molecular pathways related to hypoxia and angiogenesis.