Teresa Amaral

Dr. Teresa Amaral

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2020 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Claus GarbeClaus Garbe
Claus Garbe
TATeresa Amaral
Teresa Amaral
KPKetty Peris
Ketty Peris
AHAxel Hauschild
Axel Hauschild
PAPetr Arenberger
Petr Arenberger
AEAlexander M.M. Eggermont
Alexander M.M. Eggermont
A unique collaboration of multidisciplinary experts from the European Dermatology Forum, the European Association of Dermato-Oncology and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on cutaneous melanoma diagnosis and treatment, based on systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. Cutaneous melanomas are excised with 1- to 2-cm safety margins. Sentinel lymph node dissection shall be performed as a staging procedure in patients with tumour thickness ≥1.0 mm or ≥0.8 mm with additional histological risk factors, although there is as yet no clear survival benefit for this approach. Therapeutic decisions in stage III/IV patients should be primarily made by an interdisciplinary oncology team ("Tumor Board"). Adjuvant therapies in stage III/IV patients are primarily anti-PD-1, independent of mutational status, or dabrafenib plus trametinib for BRAF-mutant patients. In distant metastasis, either resected or not, systemic treatment is indicated. For first-line treatment, particularly in BRAF wild-type patients, immunotherapy with PD-1 antibodies alone or in combination with CTLA-4 antibodies shall be considered. In particular scenarios for patients with stage IV melanoma and a BRAF-V600 E/K mutation, first-line therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors can be offered as an alternative to immunotherapy. In patients with primary resistance to immunotherapy and harbouring a BRAF-V600 E/K mutation, this therapy shall be offered in second-line. Systemic therapy in stage III/IV melanoma is a rapidly changing landscape, and it is likely that these recommendations may change in the near future.

1 February 2020 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Claus GarbeClaus Garbe
Claus Garbe
TATeresa Amaral
Teresa Amaral
KPKetty Peris
Ketty Peris
AHAxel Hauschild
Axel Hauschild
PAPetr Arenberger
Petr Arenberger
AEAlexander M.M. Eggermont
Alexander M.M. Eggermont

1 March 2017 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TATeresa Amaral
Teresa Amaral
TSTobias Sinnberg
Tobias Sinnberg
FMFriedegund Meier
Friedegund Meier
CKClemens Krepler
Clemens Krepler
MLMitchell Levesque
Mitchell Levesque
Claus GarbeClaus Garbe
Claus Garbe

16 June 2022 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Claus GarbeClaus Garbe
Claus Garbe
UKUlrike Keim
Ulrike Keim
TATeresa Amaral
Teresa Amaral
CBCarola Berking
Carola Berking
TEThomas K. Eigentler
Thomas K. Eigentler
O(On Behalf Of The Central Malignant Melanoma Registry (Cmmr)
On Behalf Of The Central Malignant Melanoma Registry (Cmmr)
PURPOSE: The first randomized trial of adjuvant treatment with checkpoint inhibitor in stage II melanoma reported a significant reduction in risk of tumor recurrence. This study evaluates two independent data sets to further document survival probabilities for patients with primary stage I and II melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Central Malignant Melanoma Registry (CMMR) in Germany evaluated 17,544 patients with a primary diagnosis of stage I and II melanoma from 2000 to 2015. The exploratory cohort consisted of 6,725 patients from the Center for Dermato-Oncology at the University of Tübingen, and the confirmatory cohort consisted of 10,819 patients from 11 other German centers. Survival outcomes were compared with published American Joint Committee on Cancer version 8 (AJCCv8) stage I and II survival data. RESULTS: For the two CMMR cohorts in stage IA compared with the AJCCv8 cohort, melanoma-specific survival rates at 10 years were 95.1%-95.6% versus 98%; 89.7%-90.9% versus 94% in stage IB; 80.7%-83.1% versus 88% in stage IIA; 72.0%-79.9% versus 82% in stage IIB; and 57.6%-64.7% versus 75% in stage IIC, respectively. Recurrence rates were approximately twice as high as melanoma-specific mortality rates in stages IA-IIA. CONCLUSION: The melanoma-specific survival rates in the two CMMR cohorts across stages I and II are less favorable than published in AJCCv8. This has important implications for the consideration of adjuvant treatment in this population.

24 April 2024 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Claus GarbeClaus Garbe
Claus Garbe
AFAna-Maria Forsea
Ana-Maria Forsea
TATeresa Amaral
Teresa Amaral
PAPetr Arenberger
Petr Arenberger
PAPhilippe Autier
Philippe Autier
LBLieve Brochez
Lieve Brochez
Cancers of the skin are the most commonly occurring cancers in humans. In fair-skinned populations, up to 95% of keratinocyte skin cancers and 70-95% of cutaneous melanomas are caused by ultraviolet radiation and are thus theoretically preventable. Currently, however, there is no comprehensive global advice on practical steps to be taken to reduce the toll of skin cancer. To address this gap, an expert working group comprising clinicians and researchers from Africa, America, Asia, Australia, and Europe, together with learned societies (European Association of Dermato-Oncology, Euromelanoma, Euroskin, European Union of Medical Specialists, and the Melanoma World Society) reviewed the extant evidence and issued the following evidence-based recommendations for photoprotection as a strategy to prevent skin cancer. Fair skinned people, especially children, should minimise their exposure to ultraviolet radiation, and are advised to use protective measures when the UV index is forecast to reach 3 or higher. Protective measures include a combination of seeking shade, physical protection (e.g. clothing, hat, sunglasses), and applying broad-spectrum, SPF 30 + sunscreens to uncovered skin. Intentional exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation for the purpose of sunbathing and tanning is considered an unhealthy behaviour and should be avoided. Similarly, use of solaria and other artificial sources of ultraviolet radiation to encourage tanning should be strongly discouraged, through regulation if necessary. Primary prevention of skin cancer has a positive return on investment. We encourage policymakers to communicate these messages to the general public and promote their wider implementation.

1 March 2017 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TATeresa Amaral
Teresa Amaral
TSTobias W. Sinnberg
Tobias W. Sinnberg
FMFriedegund Meier
Friedegund Meier
CKClemens Krepler
Clemens Krepler
MLMitchell Levesque
Mitchell Levesque
Claus GarbeClaus Garbe
Claus Garbe