Kira Makarova

Dr. Kira Makarova

National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 December 2019 in Nature Reviews Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Kira MakarovaKira Makarova
Kira Makarova
YWYuri I. Wolf
Yuri I. Wolf
JIJaime Iranzo
Jaime Iranzo
SSSergey A. Shmakov
Sergey A. Shmakov
OAOmer S. Alkhnbashi
Omer S. Alkhnbashi
Eugene KooninEugene Koonin
Eugene Koonin

16 March 2006 in Biology Direct
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Kira MakarovaKira Makarova
Kira Makarova
NGNick Grishin
Nick Grishin
SSSvetlana Shabalina
Svetlana Shabalina
YWYuri I Wolf
Yuri I Wolf
Eugene KooninEugene Koonin
Eugene Koonin
Background: All archaeal and many bacterial genomes contain Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindrome Repeats (CRISPR) and variable arrays of the CRISPR-associated (cas) genes that have been previously implicated in a novel form of DNA repair on the basis of comparative analysis of their protein product sequences. However, the proximity of CRISPR and cas genes strongly suggests that they have related functions which is hard to reconcile with the repair hypothesis. Results: The protein sequences of the numerous cas gene products were classified into ~25 distinct protein families; several new functional and structural predictions are described. Comparative-genomic analysis of CRISPR and cas genes leads to the hypothesis that the CRISPR-Cas system (CASS) is a mechanism of defense against invading phages and plasmids that functions analogously to the eukaryotic RNA interference (RNAi) systems. Specific functional analogies are drawn between several components of CASS and proteins involved in eukaryotic RNAi, including the double-stranded RNA-specific helicase-nuclease (dicer), the endonuclease cleaving target mRNAs (slicer), and the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. However, none of the CASS components is orthologous to its apparent eukaryotic functional counterpart. It is proposed that unique inserts of CRISPR, some of which are homologous to fragments of bacteriophage and plasmid genes, function as prokaryotic siRNAs (psiRNA), by base-pairing with the target mRNAs and promoting their degradation or translation shutdown. Specific hypothetical schemes are developed for the functioning of the predicted prokaryotic siRNA system and for the formation of new CRISPR units with unique inserts encoding psiRNA conferring immunity to the respective newly encountered phages or plasmids. The unique inserts in CRISPR show virtually no similarity even between closely related bacterial strains which suggests their rapid turnover, on evolutionary scale. Corollaries of this finding are that, even among closely related prokaryotes, the most commonly encountered phages and plasmids are different and/or that the dominant phages and plasmids turn over rapidly. Conclusion: We proposed previously that Cas proteins comprise a novel DNA repair system. The association of the cas genes with CRISPR and, especially, the presence, in CRISPR units, of unique inserts homologous to phage and plasmid genes make us abandon this hypothesis. It appears most likely that CASS is a prokaryotic system of defense against phages and plasmids that functions via the RNAi mechanism. The functioning of this system seems to involve integration of fragments of foreign genes into archaeal and bacterial chromosomes yielding heritable immunity to the respective agents. However, it appears that this inheritance is extremely unstable on the evolutionary scale such that the repertoires of unique psiRNAs are completely replaced even in closely related prokaryotes, presumably, in response to rapidly changing repertoires of dominant phages and plasmids. This article was reviewed by: Eric Bapteste, Patrick Forterre, and Martijn Huynen. Open peer review: Reviewed by Eric Bapteste, Patrick Forterre, and Martijn Huynen. For the full reviews, please go to the Reviewers' comments section.

9 November 2020 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMichael Y Galperin
Michael Y Galperin
YWYuri I Wolf
Yuri I Wolf
Kira MakarovaKira Makarova
Kira Makarova
RARoberto Vera Alvarez
Roberto Vera Alvarez
DLDavid Landsman
David Landsman
Eugene KooninEugene Koonin
Eugene Koonin
The Clusters of Orthologous Genes (COG) database, also referred to as the Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins, was created in 1997 and went through several rounds of updates, most recently, in 2014. The current update, available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/COG, substantially expands the scope of the database to include complete genomes of 1187 bacteria and 122 archaea, typically, with a single genome per genus. In addition, the current version of the COGs includes the following new features: (i) the recently deprecated NCBI’s gene index (gi) numbers for the encoded proteins are replaced with stable RefSeq or GenBank\ENA\DDBJ coding sequence (CDS) accession numbers; (ii) COG annotations are updated for >200 newly characterized protein families with corresponding references and PDB links, where available; (iii) lists of COGs grouped by pathways and functional systems are added; (iv) 266 new COGs for proteins involved in CRISPR-Cas immunity, sporulation in Firmicutes and photosynthesis in cyanobacteria are included; and (v) the database is made available as a web page, in addition to FTP. The current release includes 4877 COGs. Future plans include further expansion of the COG collection by adding archaeal COGs (arCOGs), splitting the COGs containing multiple paralogs, and continued refinement of COG annotations.

28 August 2020 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LGLinyi Gao
Linyi Gao
HAHan Altae-Tran
Han Altae-Tran
FBFrancisca Böhning
Francisca Böhning
Kira MakarovaKira Makarova
Kira Makarova
MSMichael Segel
Michael Segel
FZFeng Zhang
Feng Zhang
Prokaryotic enzymes for viral defense: The arms race between prokaryotes and viruses provides a strong evolutionary force to create diverse enzymatic activities that mediate antiviral immune responses. These immune components often cluster together in the host genomes, leading to expanded defense systems. Taking advantage of the evolutionary modularity of defense systems, Gao et al. bioinformatically predicted defense genes in most available bacterial and archaeal genomes. In addition, they reconstituted the newly identified systems in Escherichia coli and verified their defense functions against specific bacteriophages. In particular, they characterized defense functions for several predicted nucleoside triphosphatases. Science , this issue p. 1077

5 July 2019 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJonathan Strecker
Jonathan Strecker
ALAlim Ladha
Alim Ladha
ZGZachary Gardner
Zachary Gardner
JSJonathan L. Schmid-Burgk
Jonathan L. Schmid-Burgk
Kira MakarovaKira Makarova
Kira Makarova
FZFeng Zhang
Feng Zhang
Beyond adaptive immunity: Prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas systems defend bacterial cells from phage and plasmid infection. Strecker et al. characterized a CRISPR-Cas system that functions beyond adaptive immunity (see the Perspective by Hou and Zhang). Type V-K CRISPR-Cas from cyanobacteria was associated with a Tn7-like transposon and a natural nuclease–deficient effector Cas12k. Cas12k directed the insertion of Tn7-like transposons into target sites via RNA-guided Tn7 transposition. This system was reprogrammed to efficiently and specifically insert DNA both in vitro and into the Escherichia coli genome. Science , this issue p. 48 ; see also p. 25

9 September 2021 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HAHan Altae-Tran
Han Altae-Tran
SKSoumya Kannan
Soumya Kannan
FDF. Esra Demircioglu
F. Esra Demircioglu
RORachel Oshiro
Rachel Oshiro
SNSuchita P. Nety
Suchita P. Nety
FZFeng Zhang
Feng Zhang
Tracing the origin of CRISPR-Cas: CRISPR-Cas systems have transformed genome editing and other biotechnologies; however, the broader origins and diversity of RNA-guided nucleases have largely remained unexplored. Altae-Tran et al . show that three distinct transposon-encoded proteins, IscB, IsrB, and TnpB, are naturally occurring, reprogrammable RNA-guided DNA nucleases (see the Perspective by Rousset and Sorek). In addition to identifying diverse guide-encoding mechanisms, the authors elucidate the evolutionary relationship between IsrB, IscB, and CRISPR-Cas9. Overall, these newly characterized systems, called OMEGA (for obligate mobile element–guided activity) systems, are found in all domains of life and may be harnessed for biotechnology development. —DJ