Liming Zhang

Liming Zhang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 July 2020 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LZLi Zhang
Li Zhang
XFXiaokai Feng
Xiaokai Feng
DZDanqing Zhang
Danqing Zhang
CJChunguo Jiang
Chunguo Jiang
HMHeng Mei
Heng Mei
Mingxing XieMingxing Xie
Mingxing Xie
Background: To investigate deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we performed a single institutional study to evaluate its prevalence, risk factors, prognosis, and potential thromboprophylaxis strategies in a large referral and treatment center. Methods: We studied a total of 143 patients with COVID-19 from January 29, 2020 to February 29, 2020. Demographic and clinical data, laboratory data, including ultrasound scans of the lower extremities, and outcome variables were obtained, and comparisons were made between groups with and without DVT. Results: Of the 143 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (age 63±14 years, 74 [51.7%] men), 66 patients developed lower extremity DVT (46.1%: 23 [34.8%] with proximal DVT and 43 [65.2%] with distal DVT). Compared with patients who did not have DVT, patients with DVT were older and had a lower oxygenation index, a higher rate of cardiac injury, and worse prognosis, including an increased proportion of deaths (23 [34.8%] versus 9 [11.7%]; P =0.001) and a decreased proportion of patients discharged (32 [48.5%] versus 60 [77.9%]; P 1.0 μg/mL (odds ratio, 5.818; P 1.0 μg/mL has a sensitivity of 88.52% and a specificity of 61.43% for screening for DVT. In the subgroup of patients with a Padua prediction score ≥4 and whose ultrasound scans were performed >72 hours after admission, DVT was present in 18 (34.0%) patients in the subgroup receiving venous thromboembolism prophylaxis versus 35 (66.0%) patients in the nonprophylaxis group ( P =0.010). Conclusions: The prevalence of DVT is high and is associated with adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism may be protective in patients with a Padua protection score ≥4 after admission. Our data seem to suggest that COVID-19 is probably an additional risk factor for DVT in hospitalized patients.

14 June 2021 in BMC Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BZBin Zhu
Bin Zhu
XFXiaokai Feng
Xiaokai Feng
CJChunguo Jiang
Chunguo Jiang
SMSong Mi
Song Mi
LYLiya Yang
Liya Yang
LZLiming Zhang
Liming Zhang
Background: Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) has become a world health threaten. Its risk factors with death were still not known. White blood cells (WBC) count as a reflection of inflammation has played a vital role in COVID-19, however its level with death is not yet investigated. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, all confirmed patients with COVID-19 at West Branch of Union Hospital from Jan 29 to Feb 28, 2020 were collected and analyzed. Demographic and clinical data including laboratory examinations were analyzed and compared between recovery and death patients. Results: A total of 163 patients including 33 death cases were included in this study. Significant association was found between WBC count and death (HR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.09–1.20, p < 0.001). The regression analysis results showed there was a significant association between WBC count and death (HR = 5.72, 95%CI: 2.21–14.82, p < 0.001) when use the second quartile as a cutoff value (> 6.16 × 10^9/L). The difference was still exist after adjusting for confounding factors (HR = 6.26, 95%CI: 1.72–22.77, p = 0.005). In addition, Kaplan-meier survival analysis showed that there was a significant decline of the cumulative survival rate (p < 0.001) in those with WBC count ≥6.16 × 10^9/L. Conclusion: WBC count at admission is significantly corelated with death in COVID-19 patients. Higher level of WBC count should be given more attention in the treatment of COVID-19.

16 July 2020 in JACEP Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJocelyn S. Zhu
Jocelyn S. Zhu
PGPeilin Ge
Peilin Ge
CJChunguo Jiang
Chunguo Jiang
YZYong Zhang
Yong Zhang
XLXiaoran Li
Xiaoran Li
Tim DuongTim Duong
Tim Duong
Study objective The large number of clinical variables associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection makes it challenging for frontline physicians to effectively triage COVID‐19 patients during the pandemic. This study aimed to develop an efficient deep‐learning artificial intelligence algorithm to identify top clinical variable predictors and derive a risk stratification score system to help clinicians triage COVID‐19 patients. Methods This retrospective study consisted of 181 hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID‐19 infection from January 29, 2020 to March 21, 2020 from a major hospital in Wuhan, China. The primary outcome was mortality. Demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, symptoms, and laboratory tests were collected at initial presentation, totaling 78 clinical variables. A deep‐learning algorithm and a risk stratification score system were developed to predict mortality. Data were split into 85% training and 15% testing. Prediction performance were compared with those using COVID‐19 severity score, CURB‐65 score and pneumonia severity index (PSI). Results Of the 181 COVID‐19 patients, 39 expired and 142 survived. Five top predictors of mortality were D‐dimer, O2 Index, neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio, C‐reactive protein, and lactate dehydrogenase. The top 5 predictors and the resultant risk score yielded, respectively, an area under curve (AUC) of 0.968 ([95% CI:0.87‐1.0]) and 0.954 ([95% CI:0.80‐0.99]) for the testing dataset. Our models outperformed COVID‐19 severity score (AUC = 0.756), CURB‐65 score (AUC = 0.671), and PSI (AUC = 0.838). The mortality rates for our risk stratification scores (0‐5) were 0, 0, 6.7, 18.2, 67.7, and 83.3%, respectively. Conclusions and relevance Deep‐learning prediction model and the resultant risk stratification score may prove useful in clinical decision‐making under time‐sensitive and resource‐constrained environment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

14 August 2021 in BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NCNa Cui
Na Cui
SMSong Mi
Song Mi
CJChunguo Jiang
Chunguo Jiang
WSWanlu Sun
Wanlu Sun
WMWenping Mao
Wenping Mao
XFXiaokai Feng
Xiaokai Feng
Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a clinical syndrome characterized by acute hypoxaemia, and few studies have reported the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in direct ARDS caused by bacterial pneumonia. We performed a study to evaluate the prevalence, risk factors, prognosis and potential thromboprophylaxis strategies of DVT in these patients. Methods: Ninety patients were included. Demographic, and clinical data, laboratory data and outcome variables were obtained, and comparisons were made between the DVT and non-DVT groups. Results: Of the 90 patients, 40 (44.4%) developed lower extremity DVT. Compared with non-DVT patients, DVT patients had higher systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) scores, lower serum creatinine levels, higher D-dimer levels, and higher rates of sedative therapy and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Multivariate analysis showed an association between the SIRS score (OR 3.803, P = 0.027), level of serum creatinine (OR 0.988, P = 0.001), IMV (OR 5.822, P = 0.002) and DVT. The combination of SIRS score, serum creatinine level and IMV has a sensitivity of 80.0% and a specificity of 74.0% for screening for DVT. The survival rate within 28 days after ARDS in the DVT group was significantly lower than that in the non-DVT group (P = 0.003). There was no difference in the prevalence of DVT between the 41 patients who received thromboprophylaxis and the 49 patients who did not receive thromboprophylaxis (41.5% vs 46.9%; P = 0.603). Conclusions: The prevalence of DVT is high in hospitalized patients with direct ARDS caused by bacterial pneumonia and may be associated with adverse outcomes. The current thromboprophylaxis strategies may need to be further optimized.

13 October 2021 in Thrombosis Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NCNa Cui
Na Cui
CJChunguo Jiang
Chunguo Jiang
HCHairong Chen
Hairong Chen
LZLiming Zhang
Liming Zhang
XFXiaokai Feng
Xiaokai Feng
Background: Few data exist on deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a group of heterogeneous diseases characterized by acute hypoxemia. Study design and methods: We retrospectively enrolled 225 adults with ARDS admitted to the Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital and the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University between 1 January 2015 and 30 June 2020. We analyzed clinical, laboratory, and echocardiography data for groups with and without DVT and for direct (pulmonary) and indirect (extrapulmonary) ARDS subgroups. Results: Ninety (40.0%) patients developed DVT. Compared with the non-DVT group, patients with DVT were older, had lower serum creatinine levels, lower partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen, higher serum procalcitonin levels, higher Padua prediction scores, and higher proportions of sedation and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Multivariate analysis showed an association between age, serum creatinine level, IMV, and DVT in the ARDS cohort. The sensitivity and specificity of corresponding receiver operating characteristic curves were not inferior to those of the Padua prediction score and the Caprini score for screening for DVT in the three ARDS cohorts. Patients with DVT had a significantly lower survival rate than those without DVT in the overall ARDS cohort and in the groups with direct and indirect ARDS. Conclusions: The prevalence of DVT is high in patients with ARDS. The risk factors for DVT are age, serum creatinine level, and IMV. DVT is associated with decreased survival in patients with ARDS.

10 May 2022 in Thrombosis Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NCNa Cui
Na Cui
CJChunguo Jiang
Chunguo Jiang
CYChenlu Yang
Chenlu Yang
LZLiming Zhang
Liming Zhang
XFXiaokai Feng
Xiaokai Feng
Background: High incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been observed in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by COVID-19 and those by bacterial pneumonia. However, the differences of incidence and risk factors of DVT in these two groups of ARDS had not been reported before. Study design and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study to investigate the difference of DVT in incidence and risk factors between the two independent cohorts of ARDS and eventually enrolled 240 patients, 105 of whom with ARDS caused by COVID-19 and 135 caused by bacterial pneumonia. Lower extremity venous compression ultrasound scanning was performed whenever possible regardless of clinical symptoms in the lower limbs. Clinical characteristics, including demographic information, clinical history, vital signs, laboratory findings, treatments, complications, and outcomes, were analyzed for patients with and without DVT in these two cohorts. Results: The 28-days incidence of DVT was higher in patients with COVID-19 than in those with bacterial pneumonia (57.1% vs 41.5%, P = 0.016). Taking death as a competitive risk, the Fine-Gray test showed no significant difference in the 28-day cumulative incidence of DVT between these two groups (P = 0.220). Fine-Gray competing risk analysis also showed an association between increased CK (creatine kinase isoenzyme)-MB levels (P = 0.003), decreased PaO2 (partial pressure of arterial oxygen)/FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen) ratios (P = 0.081), increased D-dimer levels (P = 0.064) and increased incidence of DVT in COVID-19 cohort, and an association between invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV; P = 0.001) and higher incidence of DVT and an association between VTE prophylaxis (P = 0.007) and lower incidence of DVT in bacterial pneumonia cohort. The sensitivity and specificity of the corresponding receiver operating characteristic curve originating from the combination of CK-MB levels, PaO2/FiO2 ratios, and D-dimer levels ≥0.5 μg/mL were higher than that of the DVT Wells score (P = 0.020) and were not inferior to that of the Padua prediction score (P = 0.363) for assessing the risk of DVT in COVID-19 cohort. Conclusions: The incidence of DVT in patients with ARDS caused by COVID-19 is higher than those caused by bacterial pneumonia. Furthermore, the risk factors for DVT are completely different between these two ARDS cohorts. It is suggested that COVID-19 is probably an additional risk factor for DVT in ARDS patients.