The systemic immune‐inflammation index (SII = N × P/L) based on neutrophil (N), platelet (P) and lymphocyte (L) counts is used to predict the survival of patients with malignant tumours and can fully reflect the balance between host inflammatory and immune status. This study is conducted to explore the potential prognostic significance of SII in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). A total of 262 patients with breast cancer received NACT were enrolled in this study. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, the optimal cut‐off value of SII was divided into two groups: low SII group (<602 × 10 ⁹ /L) and high SII group (≥602 × 10 ⁹ /L). The associations between breast cancer and clinicopathological variables by SII were determined by chi‐squared test or Fisher's exact test. The Kaplan‐Meier plots and log‐rank test were used to determine clinical outcomes of disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The prognostic value of SII was analysed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. The toxicity of NACT was accessed by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCICTC). According to univariate and multivariate Cox regression survival analyses, the results showed that the value of SII had prognostic significance for DFS and OS. The patients with low SII value had longer DFS and OS than those with high SII value (31.11 vs 40.76 months, HR: 1.075, 95% CI: 0.718‐1.610, P = .006; 44.47 vs 53.68 months, HR: 1.051, 95% CI: 0.707‐1.564, P = .005, respectively). The incidence of DFS and OS in breast cancer patients with low SII value was higher than that in those patients with high SII value in 3‐, 5‐ and 10‐year rates. The common toxicities after NACT were haematological and gastrointestinal reaction, and there were no differences by SII for the assessment of side effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Meanwhile, the results also proved that breast cancer patients with low SII value and high Miller and Payne grade (MPG) survived longer than those breast cancer with high SII value and low MPG grade. In patients without lymph vessel invasion, these breast cancer patients with low SII value had better prognosis and lower recurrence rates than those with high SII value. Pre‐treatment SII with the advantage of reproducible, convenient and non‐invasive was a useful prognostic indicator for breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and is a promising biomarker for breast cancer on treatment strategy decisions.

In situ vaccination (ISV) has emerged as a promising strategy in cancer immunotherapy, offering a targeted approach that uses the tumor microenvironment (TME) to stimulate an immune response directly at the tumor site. This method minimizes systemic exposure while maintaining therapeutic efficacy and enhancing safety. Recent advances in nanotechnology have enabled new approaches to ISV by utilizing nanomaterials with unique properties, including enhanced permeability, retention, and controlled drug release. ISV employing nanomaterials can induce immunogenic cell death and reverse the immunosuppressive and hypoxic TME, thereby converting a “cold” tumor into a “hot” tumor and facilitating a more robust immune response. This review examines the mechanisms through which nanomaterials-based ISV enhances anti-tumor immunity, summarizes clinical applications of these strategies, and evaluates its capacity to serve as a neoadjuvant therapy for eliminating micrometastases in early-stage cancer patients. Challenges associated with the clinical translation of nanomaterials-based ISV, including nanomaterial metabolism, optimization of treatment protocols, and integration with other therapies such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and photothermal therapy, are also discussed. Advances in nanotechnology and immunotherapy continue to expand the possible applications of ISV, potentially leading to improved outcomes across a broad range of cancer types.

Breast cancer, a hormone‐dependent tumour, generally includes four molecular subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, HER2 enriched and triple‐negative) based on oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2. Multiple hormones in the body regulate the development of breast cancer. Endocrine therapy is one of the primary treatments for hormone‐receptor‐positive breast cancer, but endocrine resistance is the primary clinical cause of treatment failure. Prolactin (PRL) is a protein hormone secreted by the pituitary gland, mainly promoting mammary gland growth, stimulating and maintaining lactation. Previous studies suggest that high PRL levels can increase the risk of invasive breast cancer in women. The expression levels of PRL and PRLR in breast cancer cells and breast cancer tissues are elevated in most ER⁺ and ER⁻ tumours. PRL activates downstream signalling pathways and affects endocrine therapy resistance by combining with prolactin receptor (PRLR). In this review, we illustrated and summarized the correlations between endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer and PRL, as well as the pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical practices. The study on PRL and its receptor would help explore reversing endocrine therapy‐resistance for breast cancer.

Breast cancer has become the most common cancer worldwide. Despite the major advances made in the past few decades in the treatment of breast cancer using a combination of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and immunotherapy, the genesis, treatment, recurrence, and metastasis of this disease continue to pose significant difficulties. New treatment approaches are therefore urgently required. Zinc is an important trace element that is involved in regulating various enzymatic, metabolic, and cellular processes in the human body. Several studies have shown that abnormal zinc homeostasis can lead to the onset and progression of various diseases, including breast cancer. This review highlights the role played by zinc transporters in pathogenesis, apoptosis, signal transduction, and potential clinical applications in breast cancer. Additionally, the translation of the clinical applications of zinc and associated molecules in breast cancer, as well as the recent developments in the zinc-related drug targets for breast cancer treatment, is discussed. These developments offer novel insights into understanding the concepts and approaches that could be used for the diagnosis and management of breast cancer.