Bill Denny

Prof. Bill Denny

Auckland Cancer Society Research Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

44Years (1983-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2019 in European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GFGuilherme Fernandes
Guilherme Fernandes
BDBill Denny
Bill Denny
Jean Leandro Dos SantosJean Leandro Dos Santos
Jean Leandro Dos Santos

1 August 2001 in European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BDBill Denny
Bill Denny

25 May 2022 in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GFGuilherme Fernandes
Guilherme Fernandes
ATAndrew M. Thompson
Andrew M. Thompson
Daniele CastagnoloDaniele Castagnolo
Daniele Castagnolo
BDBill Denny
Bill Denny
Jean Leandro Dos SantosJean Leandro Dos Santos
Jean Leandro Dos Santos

1 September 2000 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BDBill Denny
Bill Denny

1 January 2004 in Cancer Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BDBill Denny
Bill Denny
Systemic cytotoxic (antiproliferative) anticancer drugs rely primarily for their therapeutic effect on cytokinetic differences between cancer and normal cells. One approach aimed at improving the selectivity of tumor cell killing by such compounds is the use of less toxic prodrug forms that can be selectively activated in tumor tissue (tumor-activated prodrugs; TAP). There are several mechanisms potentially exploitable for the selective activation of TAP. Some utilize unique aspects of tumor physiology such as selective enzyme expression or hypoxia. Others are based on tumor-specific delivery techniques, including activation of prodrugs by exogenous enzymes delivered to tumor cells via monoclonal antibodies (ADEPT) or generated in tumor cells from DNA constructs containing the corresponding gene (GDEPT). Whichever activating mechanism is used, only a small proportion of the tumor cells are likely to be competent to activate the prodrug. Therefore, TAP need to fully exploit these “activator” cells by being...

1 January 2003 in Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BDBill Denny
Bill Denny
BBBruce Baguley
Bruce Baguley
While the majority of topoisomerase (topo) inhibitors show selectivity against either topo I or topo II, a small class of compounds can act against both enzymes. These can be divided into three classes. The first and largest class comprise drugs that bind to DNA by intercalation and include the clinically-evaluated acridine DACA, the benzopyridoindole intoplicine, the indenoquinolinone TAS-103, the benzophenazine XR11576, and the pyrazoloacridine NSC 366140. The second category comprises hybrid molecules, prepared by physically linking separate inhibitors of topo I and topo II, or by linking pure topo inhibitors to other DNA-interactive carriers. While several derivatives (e.g., camptothecin-epipodophyllotoxin and ellipticine-distamycin hybrids) have been prepared, there have been no detailed studies. The third category are less well defined as a structural class, but apparently recognize structural motifs that are present in both topo I and II enzymes. These include a series of benzoisoquinolinium quaternary salts such as NK 109, and more interestingly modified versions of classical topo I or topo II inhibitors, e.g., the modified camptothecin BN 80927 and the modified epipodophyllotoxin tafluposide (F-11782). There is as yet no detailed understanding of the factors that result in selective or dual inhibition, but structure-activity studies in several classes show that structural changes can influence topo I / II selectivity. DNA intercalation mode also appears to play a part. The basis for the high antitumor activity of some topo inhibitors is not yet understood but may depend on the complex pattern of activities that include both inhibition and poisoning of the two enzymes.