The main reason for the failure of malignant glioma treatment is local tumor recurrence. Tumor cells in hypoxic microenvironment activate HIF-1 α transcription, and thus promoting tumor invasion and metastasis is one of the important reasons. In our previous study, we clearly established that borneol opens the blood-brain tumor barrier and its related mechanism. However, the effects of borneol itself on glioma proliferation have not yet been elucidated. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the effect of borneol on glioma by constructing in vivo SD rat brain glioma model and in vitro human primary cultured glioma cell model. We found that borneol could suppress the proliferation of primary glioma cells and the tumor volume of SD rat brain glioma. Further, we measured the apoptosis effect induced by borneol in human primary cultured glioma cells. The results showed that the higher the concentration of borneol, the higher the apoptosis rate of human primary cultured glioma cells, but the effect was reversed after transfection of HIF-1 overexpression plasmid; In addition, borneol could downregulate the expression of Bcl-2 and upregulation the expression of Bax and caspase-3, similarly, the effect was also reversed after transfection of HIF-1 overexpression plasmid, suggesting that the apoptosis effect induced by borneol in human primary cultured glioma cells is mediated via HIF-1α. Moreover, the bioinformatics analysis of correlation between HIF-1α and apoptosis-related factors based on CGGA database showed that there was a positive correlation between the expression of eIF4E and HIF-1 α (P < 0.05), and in patients with high expression of eIF4E and HIF-1α had poor survival and prognosis (P<0.001). It was further discovered that in the human primary cultured glioma cells borneol regulated HIF-1a expression via mTORC1/eIF4E pathway. In conclusion, the findings of the present study suggest that HIF-1α may be a key factor in borneol induced apoptosis of glioma cells, and mTORC1 / eIF4E pathway is involved in the HIF-1α regulation by borneol in malignant glioma. Our results not only reveal the target and molecular mechanism and action of borneol leading to promote apoptosis in glioma cells, but also provide experimental basis and theoretical support for the clinical application of borneol.

Background Pembrolizumab was recently demonstrated to have survival benefit in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (r/mHNSCC). However, the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in China remains uncertain. Objective This analysis aimed to describe the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care (SOC) therapy in r/mHNSCC in China. Design A Markov model consisting of three health states (stable, progressive and dead) was developed to compare the cost and effectiveness of pembrolizumab with SOC in platinum-resistant r/mHNSCC. Model inputs for transition probabilities and toxicity were collected from the KEYNOTE-040 trial, while health utilities were estimated from a literature review. Cost data were acquired for the payer’s perspective in China. Costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3.0%. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the uncertainties surrounding model parameters. Outcome measures The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), which were calculated as the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Results The total mean cost of pembrolizumab and SOC was US$45 861 and US$41 950, respectively. As for effectiveness, pembrolizumab yielded 0.31 QALYs compared with 0.25 QALYs for SOC therapy. The ICER for pembrolizumab versus SOC was US$65 186/QALY, which was higher than the willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP) of US$28 130/QALY in China. The univariate sensitivity analysis indicated that utility values for progressive state, probability from stable to progressive in the SOC group, as well as cost of pembrolizumab were the three most influential variables on ICER. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that standard therapy was more likely to be cost-effective compared with pembrolizumab at a WTP value of US$28 130/QALY. Results were robust across both univariate analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Pembrolizumab is not likely to be a cost-effective strategy compared with SOC therapy in patients with platinum-resistant r/mHNSCC in China. Trial registration number NCT02252042; Post-results.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7150/jca.45304.].