The effect of replacing part of the wheat flour with a resistant starch rich ingredient (RSRI) − a source of functional fibre with potential health benefits − was studied in short dough biscuits. A control with no replacement and 3 formulations in which 20, 40 and 60g of flour per 100 g were replaced by an RSRI (samples 20RSRI, 40RSRI and 60RSRI) were prepared. From a technological point of view, the RSRI level influenced the consistency of the raw dough and the ease of sheeting and cutting. Regarding the eating quality of the final product, addition of the RSRI increased the breaking strength and crumbliness and reduced the resistance to penetration. In the RSRI biscuits, both the surface and the crumb were paler. The sensory acceptance of the 20RSRI biscuits did not differ significantly from that of the control. 40RSRI reduced the acceptability of the colour, appearance and texture without altering the taste, sweetness and overall acceptance. Neither of these two levels significantly reduced the consumption intention. However, 60% flour replacement produced biscuits with lower sensory acceptability and a significant reduction in consumption intention. In general, the results could be interpreted in terms of the protein-diluting effect of the added ingredient and changes in the water content and water-retention capacity of flour mixtures containing RSRI. The present results proved that resistant starch rich ingredients (RSRI) have good potential for developing fibre-rich biscuits without changing their general features.

This study aims to investigate the relationship between rheological and tribological properties of commercial full fat and fat-free/low fat versions of liquid and soft solid colloidal systems (milk, yoghurt, soft cream cheese) with their sensory properties. Oscillatory measurements (strain, frequency), flow curves and tribological measurements (lubrication behaviour using Stribeck analysis) were conducted. Oral condition was mimicked using artificial saliva at 37 ^○C. Discrimination test was conducted by 63 untrained consumers, followed by a qualitative questionnaire. Consumers significantly discriminated the fat-free/low fat from the full fat versions (p < 0.01) in all product classes, with most common verbatim used being “creamy”, “sweet” for the full fat versus “watery”, “sour” for the fat-free samples. Flow behaviour of both versions of milk showed overlapping trends with no significant differences identified both in absence and presence of saliva (p > 0.05). Full fat and fat free yoghurts had similar yielding behaviour and elastic modulus (G′), even in simulated oral conditions. However, in case of soft cream cheese, the full fat version had a moderately higher G′ than the low fat counterpart. Even in presence of artificial saliva, there was slight but significant difference in viscoelasticity between the cream cheese variants depending on fat content (p < 0.05). Stribeck curve analyses showed that at lower entrainment velocities (1–100 mm s⁻¹), both full fat yoghurt and soft cream cheese exhibited a significantly lower traction coefficient when compared to fat-free/low fat versions (p < 0.05), which might be attributed to the lubricating effect of the coalesced fat droplets. Surprisingly, whole and skim milks showed no significant difference in traction coefficients irrespective of the entrainment speeds (p > 0.05). Results suggest that sensory distinction between fat-free and full fat versions, particularly in semi-solid systems could be better predicted by lubrication data as compared to bulk rheology.