Sang Hyub Lee, Jung Wan Choe, Young Koog Cheon, Miyoung Choi, Min Kyu Jung, Dong Kee Jang, Jung Hyun Jo, Jae Min Lee, Eui Joo Kim, Sung Yong Han, Young Hoon Choi, Hyung-Il Seo, Dong Ho Lee, and Hong Sik Lee. Gut and Liver 2023;17:34-48. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl220108
Background: Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) is a precancerous lesion of cholangiocarcinoma, for which surgical resection is the most effective treatment. We evaluated the predictors of malignancy in IPNB according to anatomical location and the prognosis without surgery. Methods: A total of 196 IPNB patients who underwent pathologic confirmation by surgical resection or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography or percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic biopsy were included. Clinicopathological findings of IPNB with invasive carcinoma or mucosal dysplasia were analyzed according to anatomical location. Results: Of the 116 patients with intrahepatic IPNB (I-IPNB) and 80 patients with extrahepatic IPNB (E-IPNB), 62 (53.4%) and 61 (76.3%) were diagnosed with invasive carcinoma, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that mural nodule > 12 mm (p = 0.043) in I-IPNB and enhancement of mural nodule (p = 0.044) in E-IPNB were predictive factors for malignancy. For pathologic discrepancy before and after surgery, IPNB has a 71.2% sensitivity and 82.3% specificity. In the non-surgical IPNB group, composed of nine I-IPNB and seven E-IPNB patients, 43.7% progressed to IPNB with invasive carcinoma within 876 days. Conclusions: E-IPNB has a higher rate of malignancy than I-IPNB. The predictive factor for malignancy is mural nodule > 12 mm in I-IPNB and mural nodule enhancement in E-IPNB.
Background/Aims: Intraductal radiofrequency ablation (ID-RFA) is a novel therapy for unresectable malignant biliary obstructions. ID-RFA for perihilar lesions is associated with a high risk of adverse events. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of temperature-controlled ID-RFA for perihilar malignant biliary obstruction. Methods: Sixteen patients with pathologically proven perihilar cholangiocarcinoma were prospectively enrolled to evaluate the feasibility of hilar ID-RFA. Clinical efficacy and outcomes were subsequently evaluated in a multicenter retrospective cohort. Results: Nine of the 16 patients in the prospective cohort had Bismuth type IV and 7 had type IIIA perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. The median length of stricture was 34.5 mm. The median number of ID-RFA sessions was three, and all sessions were technically and functionally successful without severe adverse events. Clinical outcomes were assessed using a multicenter hilar ID-RFA cohort of 21 patients; the median stent patency and overall survival were 90 days (range: 35–483 days) and 147 days (range: 92–487 days), respectively. An approximate 16-month patency of the bile duct was maintained in one patient who had an intraductal growth pattern. In a comparison of the self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) and plastic stent (PS) after hilar ID-RFA, no differences in stent patency (89 vs 90.5 days, respectively; P = .912) and adverse events (20.0% vs 10%, respectively; P = .739) were observed. Conclusions: ID-RFA at 7 W for 120 seconds is safe and feasible in patients with advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. After ID-RFA, SEMS and PS placement showed comparable patency and survival rates. Trial registration number: KCT0003223
Biliary tract cancer (BTC) has poor prognosis; thus, early diagnosis is important to decrease mortality. Although vimentin-positive circulating tumor cells (V-CTCs) are a good candidate for diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, studies on the topic are limited. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of V-CTCs between BTC and benign biliary disease (BBD) and determine the prognostic value of V-CTCs in BTC patients. We recruited 69 participants who had BTCs and BBDs from a single tertiary referral center. We analyzed CTCs and V-CTCs in peripheral blood using the CD-PRIMETM system. Seven patients were excluded due to a technical failure of CTC detection. CTCs were detected in all 62 patients. CTC count > 40/mL blood (55.8% vs. 20%, p = 0.039), V-CTC count > 15/mL blood (57.7% vs. 10%, p = 0.005), and V-CTC/CTC ratio > 40% (48.1% vs. 10%, p = 0.025) were significantly different between BTCs and BBDs. Two or more of these three parameters (61.5% vs. 10%, p = 0.002) increased the accuracy. A combination of CTC markers with CA19-9 and biopsy increased the accuracy (90.4% vs. 10%, p = 0.000). V-CTC > 50/mL blood was a significant factor affecting survival (140 (66.6–213.3) vs. 253 (163.9–342.1) days, p = 0.008). V-CTC could be a potential biomarker for early diagnosis and predicting prognosis in patients with BTC.
1 June 2023 in Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology
Purpose: Resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a high risk of recurrence after curative resection; despite this, the preoperative risk factors for predicting early recurrence remain unclear. This study therefore aimed to identify preoperative inflammation and nutrition factors associated with early recurrence of resectable PDAC.Methods: From March 2021 to November 2021, a total of 20 patients who underwent curative resection for PDAC were enrolled in this study. We evaluated the risk factors for early recurrence within 1 year by univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox hazard proportional regression. The cutoff values for predicting recurrence were examined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.Results: In our univariate and multivariate analyses, C-reactive protein (CRP), CRP-albumin ratio, and CRP-prealbumin ratio, as well as sex and age, were significant independent prognostic factors for early recurrence in PDAC. However, known inflammatory factors (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios), nutritional factors (albumin, prealbumin, ferritin, vitamin D), and inflammatory-nutritional factors (Glasgow Prognostic Score, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, albumin-bilirubin) showed no association with early recurrence. In addition, using cutoff values by ROC curve analysis, a high preoperative CRP level of >5 mg/L, as well as high CRP-to-albumin (>5.3) and CRP-to-prealbumin (>1.3) ratios showed no prognostic value.Conclusion: Our results showed that inflammatory and perioperative nutritional factors, especially CRP-to-prealbumin ratio, have significant associations with early recurrence after curative resection in resectable PDAC. Therefore, for such patients, a cautious approach is needed when inflammation and poor nutritional status are present.
1 January 2024 in Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), classified as choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) and hepaticogastrostomy (HGS), is a feasible and effective alternative for distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) in failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. However, the preferred technique for better outcomes has not yet been evaluated. Objectives: We compared the long-term outcomes between the techniques. Design: Retrospective comparative study. Methods: We reviewed consecutive patients who underwent EUS-CDS or EUS-HGS with transmural stent placement for distal MBO between 2009 and 2022. The primary outcome was the stent patency. The secondary outcomes were technical and clinical success, adverse events (AEs) of each technique, and independent risk factors for stent dysfunction. Results: In all, 115 patients were divided into EUS-CDS ( n = 56) and EUS-HGS ( n = 59) groups. Among them, technical success was achieved in 98.2% of EUS-CDS and 96.6% of EUS-HGS groups. Furthermore, clinical success was 96.4% in EUS-CDS and 88.1% in EUS-HGS groups, without significant difference ( p = 0.200). The mean duration of stent patency for EUS-CDS was 770.3 days while that for EUS-HGS was 164.9 days ( p = 0.010). In addition, the only independent risk factor for stent dysfunction was systematic treatment after EUS-BD [hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval 0.238 (0.066–0.863), p = 0.029]. The incidence of stent dysfunction of EUS-HGS was higher than EUS-CDS (35.1% versus 18.2%, 0.071), despite no significant differences even in late AEs. Conclusion: In distal MBO, EUS-CDS may be better than EUS-HGS with longer stent patency and fewer AEs. Furthermore, systematic treatment after EUS-BD is recommended for the improvement of stent patency.