Ewa Kmiecik

Dr. Ewa Kmiecik

AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059, Kraków, Poland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2020 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DPDamian Pietrzak
Damian Pietrzak
JKJarosław Kania
Jarosław Kania
Ewa KmiecikEwa Kmiecik
Ewa Kmiecik
GMGrzegorz Malina
Grzegorz Malina
KWKatarzyna Wątor
Katarzyna Wątor
The occurrence of emerging contaminants, such as: personal care products, medicines, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and their transformation products in the environment is of concern for human health and aquatic ecosystems due to their high persistence, toxicity and potential to bioaccumulation. Among pesticides, the main attention and thus our focus is on neonicotinoids: acetamiprid, clothianidin, imidacloprid, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam, which are widely used classes of insecticides in agriculture. Determining the associated risk to humans and ecosystems from neonicotinoid insecticides requires detailed understanding of their fate and transport in the environment which is complex and includes diverse pathways and processes depending on environmental compartments in which they occur. This paper critically reviews the current state of the art about processes, parameters and phenomena influencing the fate of neonicotinoid insecticides in soil-water systems (i.e. soil and groundwater), and reveals existing knowledge gaps. Sorption, biodegradation, chemical transformations of neonicotinoid insecticides in the soil and leaching to the groundwater, as well as groundwater/surface water interactions are highlighted, as they determine their further migration from sources, through soils to groundwater systems and then to other environmental compartments posing ecological and human risks. A number of key knowledge gaps in fate of neonicotinoid insecticides in soil-water systems are identified, that concern mostly processes and pathways occurring in the groundwater, and require further research to assess the associated risk to humans and ecosystems.

7 April 2019 in CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DPDamian Pietrzak
Damian Pietrzak
Jaroslaw KanakJaroslaw Kanak
Jaroslaw Kanak
Grzegorz MalinaGrzegorz Malina
Grzegorz Malina
Ewa KmiecikEwa Kmiecik
Ewa Kmiecik
KWKatarzyna Wątor
Katarzyna Wątor

1 April 2019 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BMBartosz Mikoda
Bartosz Mikoda
APAnna Potysz
Anna Potysz
Ewa KmiecikEwa Kmiecik
Ewa Kmiecik

4 March 2016 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ewa KmiecikEwa Kmiecik
Ewa Kmiecik
Barbara TomaszewskaBarbara Tomaszewska
Barbara Tomaszewska
KWKatarzyna Wątor
Katarzyna Wątor
Michał BodzekMichał Bodzek
Michał Bodzek
The aim of the study was to compare the two reference methods for the determination of boron in water samples and further assess the impact of the method of preparation of samples for analysis on the results obtained. Samples were collected during different desalination processes, ultrafiltration and the double reverse osmosis system, connected in series. From each point, samples were prepared in four different ways: the first was filtered (through a membrane filter of 0.45 μm) and acidified (using 1 mL ultrapure nitric acid for each 100 mL of samples) (FA), the second was unfiltered and not acidified (UFNA), the third was filtered but not acidified (FNA), and finally, the fourth was unfiltered but acidified (UFA). All samples were analysed using two analytical methods: inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). The results obtained were compared and correlated, and the differences between them were studied. The results show that there are statistically significant differences between the concentrations obtained using the ICP-MS and ICP-OES techniques regardless of the methods of sampling preparation (sample filtration and preservation). Finally, both the ICP-MS and ICP-OES methods can be used for determination of the boron concentration in water. The differences in the boron concentrations obtained using these two methods can be caused by several high-level concentrations in selected whole-water digestates and some matrix effects. Higher concentrations of iron (from 1 to 20 mg/L) than chromium (0.02–1 mg/L) in the samples analysed can influence boron determination. When iron concentrations are high, we can observe the emission spectrum as a double joined and overlapping peak.


3 March 2021 in Urban Water Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PRPiotr Rusiniak
Piotr Rusiniak
Ewa KmiecikEwa Kmiecik
Ewa Kmiecik
KWKatarzyna Wątor
Katarzyna Wątor
RDRobert Duda
Robert Duda
RBRyszard Bugno
Ryszard Bugno
The present study reports for the first time the occurrence of selected pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the shallow aquifer underlying the Kraków city. Urban groundwater samples were gathered from 11 wells, which can serve as the emergency water supply wells. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method with the previous pre-concentration of samples using an SPE technique was applied for the determination of the PPCPs selected. There were quantified concentrations of PPCPs from the groups of estrogens (17-α-ethinylestradiol (EE2), 2.6–18.7 ng/L), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ketoprofen, 59.5 ng/L in 1 sample), and antimicrobial preservatives used in cosmetic production (methylparaben up to 91.5 ng/L). Triclosan was observed in all analysed water samples in concentrations above the limit of detection. The presence of the PPCPs in the shallow aquifer is an evidence that the sewer network system under the city leaks and then pollutes the urban groundwater.