Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 122 Agricultural Sciences and Industry, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Prof. John P. Vanden Heuvel
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 122 Agricultural Sciences and Industry, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Administration of ammonium salts of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) to rats results in peroxisome proliferation and benign liver tumors, events associated with activation of the nuclear receptor (NR) peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα). Due to its fatty acid structure, PFOA may activate other NRs, such as PPARβ, PPARγ, liver X receptor (LXR), or retinoid X receptor (RXR). In this study, the activation of human, mouse, and rat PPARα, PPARβ, PPARγ, LXRβ, and RXRα by PFOA (including its linear and branched isomers) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) was investigated and compared to several structural classes of natural fatty acids and appropriate positive control ligands. An NR ligand-binding domain/Gal4 DNA-binding domain chimeric reporter system was used. Human, mouse, and rat PPARα were activated by PFOA isomers and PFOS. PPARβ was less sensitive to the agents tested, with only PFOA affecting the mouse receptor. PFOA and PFOS also activated human, mouse, and rat PPARγ, although the maximum induction of PPARγ was much less than that seen with rosiglitazone, suggesting that PFOA and PFOS are partial agonists of this receptor. Neither LXRβ nor the common heterodimerization partner RXRα was activated by PFOA in any species examined. Taken together, these data show that of the NRs studied, PPARα is the most likely target of PFOA and PFOS, although PPARγ is also activated to some extent. Compared to naturally occurring long-chain fatty acids, e.g. linoleic and α-linolenic acids, these perfluorinated fatty acid analogs were more selective and less potent in their activation of the NRs.
Peroxisome proliferators (PPs) are an important group of chemicals that include certain hypolipidemic drugs, plasticizers and pollutants. Many of these agents are known rodent liver tumor promoters and debate exists as to whether humans are at increased cancer risk following exposure to PPs. Research over the last decade has focused on determining the biochemical and molecular mechanisms by which peroxisome proliferators exert their effects, in the hope that this controversy will be settled. PPs regulate gene expression via a steroid hormone receptor, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR). At least three subtypes of PPAR (alpha, beta and gamma) have been cloned from several species, including humans. These receptors have been implicated in tumor promotion, cellular differentiation, and apoptosis. In the present article, the current understanding of how PPARs are involved in tumorigenesis, and what this may mean to human risk assessment, will be discussed.
Omega-3-PUFAs, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), are associated with prevention of various aspects of metabolic syndrome. In the present studies, the effects of oil rich in EPA on gene expression and activation of nuclear receptors was examined and compared with other ω3-PUFAs. The EPA-rich oil (EO) altered the expression of FA metabolism genes in THP-1 cells, including stearoyl CoA desaturase (SCD) and FA desaturase-1 and -2 (FASDS1 and -2). Other ω3-PUFAs resulted in a similar gene expression response for a subset of genes involved in lipid metabolism and inflammation. In reporter assays, EO activated human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) and PPARβ/γ with minimal effects on PPARγ, liver X receptor, retinoid X receptor, farnesoid X receptor, and retinoid acid receptor γ (RARγ); these effects were similar to that observed for purified EPA. When serum from a 6 week clinical intervention with dietary supplements containing olive oil (control), DHA, or two levels of EPA were applied to THP-1 cells, the expression of SCD and FADS2 decreased in the cells treated with serum from the ω3-PUFA-supplemented individuals. Taken together, these studies indicate regulation of gene expression by EO that is consistent with treating aspects of dyslipidemia and inflammation.
Walnuts contain bioactive molecules that may contribute to their beneficial effects, including alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) and phytosterols. In these studies, extracts of walnut, purified compounds, or postprandial serum were examined for effects on breast cancer cell proliferation and gene expression. Extracts derived from walnut oil decreased proliferation of MCF-7 cells, as did ALA and β-sitosterol. The gene expression response of ALA in the mouse breast cancer cell line TM2H indicates this molecule has multiple cellular targets with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) target genes, liver X receptor (LXR), and farnesoid X receptor (FXR) target genes being affected. In transactivation assays, walnut oil extracts increased activity of FXR to a greater extent than the other tested nuclear receptors. When examined separately, walnut components ALA and β-sitosterol were the most efficacious activators of FXR. When serum from individuals fed walnut components were applied to MCF-7 cells, there was a correlation between body mass index and breast cancer cell proliferation in vitro. Taken together, these data support an effect of walnut and its bioactive constituents on mammary epithelial cells and that multiple molecular targets may be involved.