Significance: The privileged interrelationship between mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) plays a key role in a variety of physiological functions, from lipid metabolism to Ca ²⁺ signalling, and its modulation influences apoptotic susceptibility, mitophagy, and cellular bioenergetics. Among the several proteins known to influence ER–mitochondria interactions, mitofusin 2 (Mfn2) has been proposed to form a physical tether. In this study, we demonstrate that Mfn2 instead works as an ER–mitochondria tethering antagonist preventing an excessive, potentially toxic, proximity between the two organelles. Cells in which Mfn2 is ablated or reduced have an increased number of ER–mitochondria close contacts, potentiated Ca ²⁺ transfer between the two organelles, and greater sensitivity to cell-death stimuli that implies mitochondria Ca ²⁺ overload toxicity.

Transport intermediates (TIs) have a central role in intracellular traffic, and much effort has been directed towards defining their molecular organization. Unfortunately, major uncertainties remain regarding their true structure in living cells. To address this question, we have developed an approach based on the combination of the green fluorescent protein technology and correlative light-electron microscopy, by which it is possible to monitor an individual carrier in vivo and then take a picture of its ultrastructure at any moment of its lifecycle. We have applied this technique to define the structure of TIs operating from the Golgi apparatus to the plasma membrane, whose in vivo dynamics have been characterized recently by light microscopy. We find that these carriers are large (ranging from 0.3–1.7 μm in maximum diameter, nearly half the size of a Golgi cisterna), comprise almost exclusively tubular-saccular structures, and fuse directly with the plasma membrane, sometimes minutes after docking to the fusion site.

A variety of secretory cargoes move through the Golgi, but the pathways and mechanisms of this traffic are still being debated. Here, we evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of five current models for Golgi traffic: (1) anterograde vesicular transport between stable compartments, (2) cisternal progression/maturation, (3) cisternal progression/maturation with heterotypic tubular transport, (4) rapid partitioning in a mixed Golgi, and (5) stable compartments as cisternal progenitors. Each model is assessed for its ability to explain a set of key observations encompassing multiple cell types. No single model can easily explain all of the observations from diverse organisms. However, we propose that cisternal progression/maturation is the best candidate for a conserved core mechanism of Golgi traffic, and that some cells elaborate this core mechanism by means of heterotypic tubular transport between cisternae.