Xun Xu

Dr. Xun Xu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 June 2022 in Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XHXiangui He
Xiangui He
PSPadmaja Sankaridurg
Padmaja Sankaridurg
JWJingjing Wang
Jingjing Wang
JCJun Chen
Jun Chen
TNThomas Naduvilath
Thomas Naduvilath
XXXun Xu
Xun Xu
To evaluate the efficacy of time outdoors per school day over 2 years on myopia onset and shift. A prospective, cluster-randomized, examiner-masked, 3-arm trial. A total of 6295 students aged 6 to 9 years from 24 primary schools in Shanghai, China, stratified and randomized by school in a 1:1:1 ratio to control (n = 2037), test I (n = 2329), or test II (n = 1929) group. An additional 40 or 80 minutes of outdoor time was allocated to each school day for test I and II groups. Children in the control group continued their habitual outdoor time. Objective monitoring of outdoor and indoor time and light intensity each day was measured with a wrist-worn wearable during the second-year follow-up. The 2-year cumulative incidence of myopia (defined as cycloplegic spherical equivalent [SE] of ≤-0.5 diopters [D] in the right eye) among the students without myopia at baseline and changes in SE and axial length (AL) after 2 years. The unadjusted 2-year cumulative incidence of myopia was 24.9%, 20.6%, and 23.8% for control, test I, and II groups, respectively. The adjusted incidence decreased by 16% (incidence risk ratio [IRR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.99; P = 0.035) in test I and 11% (IRR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79-0.99; P = 0.041) in test II when compared with the control group. The test groups showed less myopic shift and axial elongation compared with the control group (test I: -0.84 D and 0.55 mm, test II: -0.91 D and 0.57 mm, control: -1.04 D and 0.65 mm). There was no significant difference in the adjusted incidence of myopia and myopic shift between the 2 test groups. The test groups had similar outdoor time and light intensity (test I: 127 ± 30 minutes/day and 3557 ± 970 lux/minute; test II: 127 ± 26 minutes/day and 3662 ± 803 lux/minute) but significantly more outdoor time and higher light intensity compared with the control group (106 ± 27 minutes/day and 2984 ± 806 lux/minute). Daily outdoor time of 120 to 150 minutes at 5000 lux/minutes or cumulative outdoor light intensity of 600 000 to 750 000 lux significantly reduced the IRR by 15%~ 24%. Increasing outdoor time reduced the risk of myopia onset and myopic shifts, especially in nonmyopic children. The protective effect of outdoor time was related to the duration of exposure and light intensity. The dose-response effect between test I and test II was not observed probably because of insufficient outdoor time achieved in the test groups, which suggests that proper monitoring on the compliance on outdoor intervention is critical if one wants to see the protective effect.

7 November 2017 in Acta Ophthalmologica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPadmaja Sankaridurg
Padmaja Sankaridurg
Xiangui HeXiangui He
Xiangui He
TNThomas Naduvilath
Thomas Naduvilath
MLMinzhi Lv
Minzhi Lv
AHArthur Ho
Arthur Ho
XXXun Xu
Xun Xu
Purpose: To systematically analyse the differences between cycloplegic and noncycloplegic refractive errors (RE) in children and to determine if the predictive value of noncycloplegic RE in categorizing RE can be improved.Methods: Random cluster sampling was used to select 6825 children aged 4–15 years. Autorefraction was performed under both noncycloplegic and cycloplegic (induced with 1% cyclopentolate drops) conditions. Paired differences between noncycloplegic and cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) RE were determined. A general linear model was developed to determine whether cycloplegic SE can be predicted using noncycloplegic SE, age and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA).Results: Compared to cycloplegia, noncycloplegia resulted in a more myopic SE (paired difference: −0.63 ± 0.65D, 95% CI: −0.612 to −0.65D, 6017 eligible right eyes) with greater differences observed in younger participants and in eyes with more hyperopic RE and smaller AL. Using raw noncycloplegic data resulted in only 61% of the eyes being correctly classified as myopic, emmetropic or hyperopic. Using age and uncorrected VA in the model, the association improved and 77% of the eyes were classified correctly. However, predicted cycloplegic SE continued to show large residual errors for low myopic to hyperopic RE. Applying the model to only those eyes with uncorrected VA <6/6 resulted in an improvement (R2 = 0. 93), with 80% of the eyes correctly classified. A higher VA cut‐off (i.e., ≤6/18) resulted in 97.5% of eyes classified correctly.Conclusion: Noncycloplegic assessment of RE in children overestimates myopia and results in a high error rate for emmetropic and hyperopic RE. Adjusting for age and applying uncorrected VA cut‐offs to noncycloplegic assessments improves detection of myopic RE and may help in identifying myopic RE in situations where cycloplegia is not available but does not help in identifying the magnitude of refractive error and therefore is of limited value.

3 April 2023 in JAMA Network Open
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XHXiangui He
Xiangui He
JWJingjing Wang
Jingjing Wang
ZZZhuoting Zhu
Zhuoting Zhu
KXKaidi Xiang
Kaidi Xiang
XZXinzi Zhang
Xinzi Zhang
XXXun Xu
Xun Xu
Myopia is one of the most common eye diseases and is of worldwide concern.1-3 In some parts of East and Southeast Asia, myopia prevalence among high school students reaches 80% to 90%.2-5 Myopia poses a burden on individuals and society for refractive error correction.6 In addition, early-onset myopia is more likely to progress to high myopia,7-9 which significantly increases the risk of potential vision-threatening conditions, such as myopic macular degeneration.10 Therefore, myopia prevention is of significance.

1 January 2019 in American Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KLKun Liu
Kun Liu
YSYanping Song
Yanping Song
GXGezhi Xu
Gezhi Xu
JYJian Ye
Jian Ye
ZWZhifeng Wu
Zhifeng Wu
ZNZhili Niu
Zhili Niu

16 September 2021 in British Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Xiangui HeXiangui He
Xiangui He
PSPadmaja Sankaridurg
Padmaja Sankaridurg
TNThomas Naduvilath
Thomas Naduvilath
JWJingjing Wang
Jingjing Wang
SXShuyu Xiong
Shuyu Xiong
XXXun Xu
Xun Xu
Purpose: To develop age-specific and gender-specific reference percentile charts for axial length (AL) and AL/corneal radius of curvature (AL/CR) and, to use percentiles to determine probability of myopia and estimate refractive error (RE).Methods: Analysis of AL, cycloplegic RE and CR of 14 127 Chinese participants aged 4–18 years from 3 studies. AL and AL/CR percentiles estimated using Lambda-Mu-Sigma method and compared for agreement using intraclass correlation (ICC). Logistic regression was used to model risk of myopia based on age, gender, AL and AL/CR percentiles. Accuracy of AL progression and RE estimated using percentiles was validated using an independent sample of 5742 eyes of children aged 7–10 years.Results: Age-specific and gender-specific AL and AL/CR (3rd, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th and 95th) percentiles are presented. Concordance between AL and AL/CR percentiles improved with age (0.13 at 4 years to >0.75 from 13 years) and a year-to-year change was observed for all except <10th percentile from 15 years. Increasing age, AL and AL/CR was associated with a more myopic RE (r2=0.45,0.70 and 0.83, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of the model to estimate probability of myopia was 86.0% and 84.5%, respectively. Estimation of 1-year change in AL using percentiles correlated highly with actual AL (ICC=0.98). Concordance of estimated to actual RE was high (ICC=0.80) and within ±0.50D and ±1.0D of actual RE for 47.4% and 78.9% of eyes, respectively.Conclusion: Age-specific and gender-specific AL and AL/CR percentiles provide reference data, aid in identifying and monitoring individuals at risk of myopia and have utility in screening for myopia. AL/CR percentiles were more accurate in estimating probability of myopia in younger children.

1 May 2020 in American Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SXShuyu Xiong
Shuyu Xiong
Xiangui HeXiangui He
Xiangui He
BZBo Zhang
Bo Zhang
JDJunjie Deng
Junjie Deng
JWJingjing Wang
Jingjing Wang
XXXun Xu
Xun Xu
To clarify the changing characteristics of choroidal thickness over time within different age ranges and among different refractive statuses of children aged 6 to 18 years. Prospective cohort study. Data of axial length, cycloplegic refraction, and choroidal thickness (using swept-source optical coherence tomography) were collected at baseline and at a one-year follow-up for 756 participants. One-year change in choroidal thickness and its association with age and refraction were analyzed. Significantly greater attenuation of choroidal thickness was observed in younger children aged 6 to 9 years for all participants (-9±25μm) and for those with a myopic shift (-12±25μm), while there was a larger increase in adolescents aged 10 to 13 years for those without a myopic shift (9±23μm). There was a marked decrease in the choroidal thickness for newly developed myopes compared with persistent nonmyopes and persistent myopes (p<0.01). The association between changes in axial length and choroidal thickness was less strong in persistent myopes (β=-15.4, p=0.022) than that in persistent nonmyopes (β=-30.4, p<0.001) and newly developed myopes (β=-33.7, p=0.001); whereas among the persistent myopes, the association was less strong in the baseline mild myopes (β=-10.4, p=0.193) than that in the baseline moderate to high myopes (β=-31.4, p=0.026). Changes in choroidal thickness varied by age. There was an increased rapid thinning of the choroid among newly developed myopes, while a nonsignificant association between changes in choroidal thickness and axial length in the early stages of myopia.