In many cells, morphogenetic events are coordinated with the cell cycle by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). For example, many mammalian cells display extended morphologies during interphase but round up into more spherical shapes during mitosis (high CDK activity) and constrict a furrow during cytokinesis (low CDK activity). In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, bud formation reproducibly initiates near the G1/S transition and requires activation of CDKs at a point called “start” in G1. Previous work suggested that CDKs acted by controlling the ability of cells to polarize Cdc42, a conserved Rho-family GTPase that regulates cell polarity and the actin cytoskeleton in many systems. However, we report that yeast daughter cells can polarize Cdc42 before CDK activation at start. This polarization operates via a positive feedback loop mediated by the Cdc42 effector Ste20. We further identify a major and novel locus of CDK action downstream of Cdc42 polarization, affecting the ability of several other Cdc42 effectors to localize to the polarity site.

Proteins associated with the yeast plasma membrane often accumulate asymmetrically within the plane of the membrane. Asymmetric accumulation is thought to underlie diverse processes, including polarized growth, stress sensing, and aging. Here, we review our evolving understanding of how cells achieve asymmetric distributions of membrane proteins despite the anticipated dissipative effects of diffusion, and highlight recent findings suggesting that differential diffusion is exploited to create, rather than dissipate, asymmetry. We also highlight open questions about diffusion in yeast plasma membranes that remain unsolved.

The diversity of cell morphologies arises, in part, through regulation of cell polarity by Rho-family GTPases. A poorly understood but fundamental question concerns the regulatory mechanisms by which different cells can generate different numbers of polarity sites. Theoretical models of polarity circuits develop multiple initial polarity sites, but then those sites engage in competition, leaving a single winner. The timescale of competition slows dramatically as GTPase concentrations at polarity sites approach a “saturation point”, allowing multiple sites to coexist. Here, we show that these principles hold in more complex mechanistic models of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae polarity machinery, and confirm model predictions in vivo . Further, we elucidate a novel design principle whereby cells can switch from competition to equalization among polarity sites. These findings provide insight into how cells determine the number of polarity sites.