Meghan Graham MacLean

Meghan Graham MacLean


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 July 2021 in Society & Natural Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJonathan R. Holt
Jonathan R. Holt
BBBrett J. Butler
Brett J. Butler
MBMark E. Borsuk
Mark E. Borsuk
MLMarla Lindsay
Marla Lindsay
MMMeghan Graham MacLean
Meghan Graham MacLean
JTJonathan Thompson
Jonathan Thompson
Private landowner participation in management initiatives can be encouraged by interventions, which must resonate with the underlying subjective motivations of the landowners. In this study, we use the Theory of Planned Behavior to gauge the relative influences of (1) attitudes; (2) subjective norms; and (3) perceived behavioral control on landowner intentions to harvest trees threatened by invasive insects. We use a survey (n = 696) to estimate the effects of these latent factors among family forest owners in New England. Our results suggest that, overall, normative pressures are the dominant influence on landowners’ harvest intentions. However, for certain subgroups, such as those with especially high levels of knowledge and experience with forest insects, or those with forestry experience, attitudes are dominant. Perceived behavioral control was not revealed to be dominant among any of our subgroups. These findings can be used to inform landowner interventions that are differentiated by landowner type.

3 December 2012 in International Journal of Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMeghan Graham MacLean
Meghan Graham MacLean
MCMichael Campbell
Michael Campbell
Daniel S. MaynardDaniel S. Maynard
Daniel S. Maynard
MDMark Ducey
Mark Ducey
RCRussell G. Congalton
Russell G. Congalton
The ability to spatially quantify changes in the landscape and create land-cover maps is one of the most powerful uses of remote sensing. Recent advances in object-based image analysis (OBIA) have also improved classification techniques for developing land-cover maps. However, when using an OBIA technique, collecting ground data to label reference units may not be straightforward, since these segments generally contain a variable number of pixels as well as a variety of pixel values, which may reflect variation in land-cover composition. Accurate classification of reference units can be particularly difficult in forested land-cover types, since these classes can be quite variable on the ground. This study evaluates how many prism sample locations are needed to attain an acceptable level of accuracy within forested reference units in southeastern New Hampshire (NH). Typical forest inventory guidelines suggest at least 10 prism samples per stand, depending on the stand area and stand type. However, because OBIA segments group pixels based on the variance of the pixels, fewer prism samples may be necessary in a segment to properly estimate the stand composition. A bootstrapping statistical technique was used to find the necessary number of prism samples to limit the variance associated with estimating the species composition of a segment. Allowing for the lowest acceptable variance, a maximum of only six prism samples was necessary to label forested reference units. All polygons needed at least two prism samples for classification.

24 April 2024 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STShersingh Joseph Tumber‐Dávila
Shersingh Joseph Tumber‐Dávila
TLTaylor Lucey
Taylor Lucey
EBEmery R. Boose
Emery R. Boose
DLDanelle Laflower
Danelle Laflower
ALAgustín León‐Sáenz
Agustín León‐Sáenz
JTJonathan Thompson
Jonathan Thompson

16 December 2019 in People and Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJonathan R. Holt
Jonathan R. Holt
MBMark E. Borsuk
Mark E. Borsuk
BBBrett J. Butler
Brett J. Butler
DKDavid B. Kittredge
David B. Kittredge
DLDanelle Laflower
Danelle Laflower
JTJonathan Thompson
Jonathan Thompson
Invasive forest insects can induce tree mortality in two ways: (a) by directly harming trees; or (b) by influencing forest owners to pre‐emptively harvest threatened trees. This study investigates forest owners’ intentions to harvest trees threatened by invasive insects. Our first objective is to identify and characterize agent functional types (AFTs) of family forest owners in the northeastern United States using a set of contingent behaviour questions contained in a mail survey. We establish AFTs as a form of dimension reduction, effectively casting landowners into a typology in which each type (AFT) has distinct probabilities of tree harvesting in response to forest insects. Our analysis identifies three functional types of landowners: ‘Cutters’ (46% of respondents; high intent to harvest trees impacted by invasive forest insects), ‘Responsive Cutters’ (42% of respondents; intent sensitive to insect impact severity), and ‘Non‐cutters’ (12% of respondents; low intent to cut). Our second objective is to model AFT membership to predict the distribution of AFTs across the landscape. Predictors are chosen from a set of survey, geographic and demographic features. Our best AFT‐prediction model has three predictor variables: parcel size (hectares of forest), geographical region, and town‐level forested fraction. Application of the model provides a high‐resolution probability distribution of AFTs across the landscape. By coupling human and insect behaviour, our results allow for holistic assessments of how invasive forest insects disturb forests, inclusive of the management response to these pests. A freePlain Language Summarycan be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

29 April 2020 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMeghan Graham MacLean
Meghan Graham MacLean
JHJonathan Holt
Jonathan Holt
MBMark Borsuk
Mark Borsuk
MLMarla Lindsay
Marla Lindsay
BBBrett J. Butler
Brett J. Butler
JTJonathan Thompson
Jonathan Thompson
Forest insects and pathogens have significant impacts on U.S. forests, annually affecting an area nearly three times that of wildfires and timber harvesting combined. However, coupled with these direct effects of forest insects and pathogens are the indirect impacts through influencing forest management practices, such as harvesting. In an earlier study, we surveyed private woodland owners in the northeastern U.S. and 84% of respondents indicated they intended to harvest in at least one of the presented insect invasion scenarios. This harvest response to insects represents a potentially significant shift in the timing, extent, and species selection of harvesting. Here we used the results from the landowner survey, regional forest inventory data, and characteristics of the emerald ash borer (Species: Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, 1888) invasion to examine the potential for a rapidly spreading invasive insect to alter harvest regimes and affect regional forest conditions. Our analysis suggests that 25% of the woodland parcels in the Connecticut River Watershed in New England may intend to harvest in response to emerald ash borer. If the emerald ash borer continues to spread at its current rate within the region, and therefore the associated management response occurs in the next decade, this could result in an increase in harvest frequencies, from 2.6% year−1 (historically) to 3.7% year−1 through to approximately 2030. If harvest intensities remain at levels found in remeasured Forest Inventory and Analysis plots, this insect-initiated harvesting would result in the removal of 12%–13% of the total aboveground biomass. Eighty-one percent of the removed biomass would be from species other than ash, creating a forest disturbance that is over twice the magnitude than that created by emerald ash borer alone, with the most valuable co-occurring species most vulnerable to biomass loss.

14 March 2024 in Ecological Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAudrey Barker Plotkin
Audrey Barker Plotkin
DODavid Orwig
David Orwig
MMMeghan Graham MacLean
Meghan Graham MacLean
AEAaron M. Ellison
Aaron M. Ellison