INCISIONAL WOUND closures have traditionally been divided into the categories of thread and threadless sutures.
1 Linen strips were first used for the closure of wounds in Egypt in 1600 BC.
2 There has been a revival of threadless closure in recent decades. Wound closure with adhesive tape has several advantages over the use of sutures, including a less pronounced inflammation reaction (caused by suture materials), lower infection rates, no risk of abscess development at the location of stitches, and greater tensile strength when wounds are sutured late in the healing process (20-150 days).
3-6 Additional advantages of taped skin closure compared with sutured skin closure include lower cost, reduction in operating room time, and improved cosmetic results.
7,8 Although the scientific basis for selecting taped skin closure for abdominal wounds has been documented,
9 the technique has not been widely used for this purpose. This may be due to fears of a wider scar, the weaker supporting strength of the tape, and/or an increased rate of wound complications, particularly in clean-contaminated wounds. Conolly et al
10 reported a lower rate of infection for the taped wounds (3.8% vs 14% for the sutured wounds) in those patients with clean-contaminated wounds. In the study by Webster and Davis,
2 the infection rate for the taped wounds (11.1%) was higher than for the sutured wounds (8.4%). To test the efficacy of skin closure using paper tape in the clean-contaminated abdominal wound, we conducted this prospective study to compare taped with sutured wounds in terms of the duration of skin closure, wound complication rate, and cosmetic appearance of the scar at 6 months after operation.