Background: Obesity has been widely reported to be associated with the disease progression of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, some studies have reported different findings. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association between obesity and poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from 1 November 2019 to 24 May 2020 was performed. Study quality was assessed, and data extraction was conducted. The meta-analysis was carried out using fixed-effects and random-effects models to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of several poor outcomes in obese and non-obese COVID-19 patients.Results: Twenty-two studies (n = 12,591 patients) were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated that body mass index (BMI) was higher in severe/critical COVID-19 patients than in mild COVID-19 patients (MD 2.48 kg/m², 95% CI [2.00 to 2.96 kg/m²]). Additionally, obesity in COVID-19 patients was associated with poor outcomes (OR = 1.683, 95% CI [1.408–2.011]), which comprised severe COVID-19, ICU care, invasive mechanical ventilation use, and disease progression (OR = 4.17, 95% CI [2.32–7.48]; OR = 1.57, 95% CI [1.18–2.09]; OR = 2.13, 95% CI [1.10–4.14]; OR = 1.41, 95% CI [1.26–1.58], respectively). Obesity as a risk factor was greater in younger patients (OR 3.30 vs. 1.72). However, obesity did not increase the risk of hospital mortality (OR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.32–2.51]).Conclusions: As a result of a potentially critical role of obesity in determining the severity of COVID-19, it is important to collect anthropometric information for COVID-19 patients, especially the younger group. However, obesity may not be associated with hospital mortality, and efforts to understand the impact of obesity on the mortality of COVID-19 patients should be a research priority in the future.

Aims: Depression, the most prevalent psychiatric disorder, is associated with the occurrence and development of atrial fibrillation (AF). P2X7 receptor (P2X7R) activation participates in the development of depression, but little attention has been given to its role in AF. This study was to investigate the effects of P2X7R on AF in depression models. Methods and results: Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and chronic unpredictable stress (CUS) were carried out to induce depression in rodents. Behavioural assessments, atrial electrophysiological parameters, electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters, western blot, and histology were performed. Atrial fibrillation inducibility was increased in both LPS- and CUS-induced depression, along with the up-regulation of P2X7R in atria. CUS facilitated atrial fibrosis. CUS reduced heart rate variability (HRV) and increased the expression of TH and GAP43, representing autonomic dysfunction. Down-regulation of Nav1.5, Cav1.2, Kv1.5, Kv4.3, Cx40, and Cx43 in CUS indicated the abnormalities in ion channels. In addition, the expression levels of TLR4, P65, P-P65, NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1, and IL-1β were elevated in depression models. Pharmacological inhibitor (Brilliant Blue G, BBG) or genetic deficiency of P2X7R significantly mitigated depressive-like behaviours; ameliorated electrophysiological deterioration and autonomic dysfunction; improved ion channel expression and atrial fibrosis; and prevented atrial NLRP3 inflammasome activation in the pathophysiological process of AF in depression models. Conclusion: LPS or CUS induces AF and promotes P2X7R-dependent activation of NLRP3 inflammasome, whereas pharmacological P2X7R inhibition or P2X7R genetic deficiency prevents atrial remodelling without interrupting normal atrial physiological functions. Our results point to P2X7R as an important factor in the pathology of AF in depression.

Click on the article title to read more.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most prevalent sustained cardiac arrhythmias. The latest studies have revealed a tight correlation between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and AF. However, the exact molecular mechanisms underlying the association between NAFLD and AF remain unclear. The current research aimed to expound the genes and signaling pathways that are related to the mechanisms underlying the association between these two diseases. Materials and methods: NAFLD- and AF- related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified via bioinformatic analysis of the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets GSE63067 and GSE79768, respectively. Further enrichment analysis of Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), the construction of a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network, the identification of significant hub genes, and receiver operator characteristic curve analysis were conducted. The gene-disease interactions were analyzed using the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database. In addition, the hub genes were validated by quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) in NAFLD cell model. Results: A total of 45 co-expressed differentially expressed genes (co-DEGs) were identified between the NAFLD/AF and healthy control individuals. GO and KEGG pathway analyses revealed that the co-DEGs were mostly enriched in neutrophil activation involved in the immune response and cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions. Moreover, eight hub genes were selected owing to their high degree of connectivity and upregulation in both the NAFLD and AF datasets. These genes included CCR2, PTPRC, CXCR2, MNDA, S100A9, NCF2, S100A12, and S100A8. Conclusions: In summary, we conducted the gene differential expression analysis, functional enrichment analysis, and PPI analysis of DEGs in AF and NAFLD, which provides novel insights into the identification of potential biomarkers and valuable therapeutic leads for AF and NAFLD.