Rebecca Larson

Prof. Rebecca Larson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 December 2023 in Nature Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RWRui Wang
Rui Wang
KYKai Yang
Kai Yang
CWCindy Wong
Cindy Wong
HAHoracio Aguirre-Villegas
Horacio Aguirre-Villegas
RLRebecca Larson
Rebecca Larson
SJSong Jin
Song Jin

1 June 2019 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJoseph Sanford
Joseph Sanford
RLRebecca Larson
Rebecca Larson
TRTROY RUNGE
TROY RUNGE

3 July 2019 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HWHui Wang
Hui Wang
HAHoracio Aguirre-Villegas
Horacio Aguirre-Villegas
RLRebecca Larson
Rebecca Larson
AAAsli Alkan-Ozkaynak
Asli Alkan-Ozkaynak
Manure characteristics change through processing, including anaerobic digestion (AD). These changes can alter handling of manure during downstream operations. This study analyzed the density, total solids (TS) content, and volatile solids (VS) content of pre-digested and anaerobically digested dairy manure from seven dairy farms in Wisconsin. The density of pre-digested manure increased from 990 to 1065 kg m−3 as the TS level increased from 1.5% to 13.0%. Density and TS for pre-digested manure from facilities using separated solids as bedding were related with a linear model for TS ranging from 1.5% to 13.0% and with a polynomial model for TS ranging from 1.5% to 50%. The model shows that density decreases with an increasing TS content when TS is greater than 8.0%. Manure from dairy facilities that used sand bedding had a VS/TS ratio of 0.87. This ratio was higher than the ratio when manure solids were used as bedding (0.81) and when food waste was incorporated into the digester (0.77). This study also provides a simple methodology to estimate biogas yield by using the density of pre- and post-digested manure.

1 January 2024 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HAHoracio Aguirre-Villegas
Horacio Aguirre-Villegas
CBCaleb Besson
Caleb Besson
RLRebecca Larson
Rebecca Larson
Nearly 60% of all ammonia (NH3) emissions are from livestock manure. Understanding the sources and magnitude of NH3 emissions from manure systems is critical to implement mitigation strategies. This study models 13 archetypical conventional (5 farms), organic (5 farms), and grazing (3 farms) dairy farms to estimate NH3 emissions from manure at the barn, storage, and after land application. Mitigation practices related to management of the herd, crop production, and manure are subsequently modeled to quantify the change in NH3 emissions from manure by comparing archetypical with these alternative practices. A mass balance of nutrients is also conducted. Emissions per tonne of excreted manure for the manure system (barn, storage, and land application) range from 3.0 to 4.4 g NH3 for conventional farms, 3.5-4.4 g NH3 for organic farms, and 3.4-3.9 g NH3 for grazing farms. For all farm types, storage and land application are the main sources of NH3 emissions from manure. In general, solid manures have higher emission intensities due to higher pH during storage (pH = 7.4 for liquid, 7.8 for slurry, and 8.5 for solid manure) and lower infiltration rates after land application when compared with slurry and liquid manures. The most effective management practices to reduce NH3 emissions from manure systems are combining solid-liquid separation with manure injection (up to 49% reduction in NH3 emissions), followed by injection alone, and reducing of crude protein in the dairy ration, especially in organic and grazing farms that have grazing and forages as the main component of the dairy ration. This study also shows that the intensity of NH3 emissions from manure depends significantly on the functional unit and presents results per manure excreted, total solids in excreted manure, animal units, and fat and protein corrected milk.

28 April 2022 in Journal of Environmental Quality
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TBTucker R. Burch
Tucker R. Burch
AFAaron D. Firnstahl
Aaron D. Firnstahl
SSSusan K. Spencer
Susan K. Spencer
RLRebecca Larson
Rebecca Larson
MBMark A. Borchardt
Mark A. Borchardt
Anaerobic digestion has been suggested as an intervention to attenuate antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in livestock manure but supporting data have typically been collected at laboratory scale. Few studies have quantified ARG fate during full‐scale digestion of livestock manure. We sampled untreated manure and digestate from seven full‐scale mesophilic dairy manure digesters to assess ARG fate through each system. Samples were collected biweekly from December through August (i.e., winter, spring, and summer; n = 235 total) and analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction for intI1, erm(B), sul1, tet(A), and tet(W). Concentrations of intI1, sul1, and tet(A) decreased during anaerobic digestion, but their removal was less extensive than expected based on previous laboratory studies. Removal for intI1 during anaerobic digestion equaled 0.28 ± 0.03 log10 units (mean ± SE), equivalent to only 48% removal and notable given intI1’s role in horizontal gene transfer and multiple resistance. Furthermore, tet(W) concentrations were unchanged during anaerobic digestion (p > 0.05), and erm(B) concentrations increased by 0.52 ± 0.03 log10 units (3.3‐fold), which is important given erythromycin's status as a critically important antibiotic for human medicine. Seasonal log10 changes in intI1, sul1, and tet(A) concentrations were ≥50% of corresponding log10 removals by anaerobic digestion, and variation in ARG and intI1 concentrations among digesters was quantitatively comparable to anaerobic digestion effects. These results suggest that mesophilic anaerobic digestion may be limited as an intervention for ARGs in livestock manure and emphasize the need for multiple farm‐level interventions to attenuate antibiotic resistance.

1 November 2019 in Agricultural Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDaesoo Kim
Daesoo Kim
NSNick Stoddart
Nick Stoddart
CRC. Alan Rotz
C. Alan Rotz
KVKarin Veltman
Karin Veltman
LCLarry Chase
Larry Chase
GTGreg Thoma
Greg Thoma