Jill L. Ostrem

Jill L. Ostrem


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 March 2011 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JOJill L. Ostrem
Jill L. Ostrem
CRC.A. Racine
C.A. Racine
GGG.A. Glass
G.A. Glass
JGJ.K. Grace
J.K. Grace
MVM.M. Volz
M.M. Volz
PSP.A. Starr
P.A. Starr
Objectives: The globus pallidus internus (GPi) has been the primary target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat severe medication-refractory dystonia. Some patients with primary cervical or segmental dystonia develop subtle bradykinesia occurring in previously nondystonic body regions during GPi DBS. Subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS may provide an alternative target choice for treating dystonia, but has only been described in a few short reports, without blinded rating scales, statistical analysis, or detailed neuropsychological studies. Methods: In this prospective pilot study, we analyzed the effect of bilateral STN DBS on safety, efficacy, quality of life, and neuropsychological functioning in 9 patients with medically refractory primary cervical dystonia. Severity of dystonia was scored by a blinded rater (unaware of the patient's preoperative or postoperative status) using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery. Lead location, medications, and adverse events were also measured. Results: STN DBS was well-tolerated with no serious adverse effects. The TWSTRS total score improved (p < 0.001) from a mean (±SEM) of 53.1 (±2.57), to 19.6 (±5.48) at 12 months. Quality of life measures were also improved. STN DBS induced no consistent neuropsychological deficits. Several patients reported depression in the study and 3 had marked weight gain. No patients developed bradykinetic side effects from stimulation, but all patients developed transient dyskinetic movements during stimulation. Conclusions: This prospective study showed that bilateral STN DBS resulted in improvement in dystonia and suggests that STN DBS may be an alternative to GPi DBS for treating primary cervical dystonia. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation results in significant improvement in cervical dystonia without bradykinetic side effects.

1 April 2008 in Neurotherapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JOJill L. Ostrem
Jill L. Ostrem
PSPhilip A. Starr
Philip A. Starr

15 October 2007 in Movement Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JOJill L. Ostrem
Jill L. Ostrem
WMWilliam J. Marks
William J. Marks
MVMonica M. Volz
Monica M. Volz
SHSusan L. Heath
Susan L. Heath
PSPhilip A. Starr
Philip A. Starr

28 January 2009 in Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BBBrian D. Berman
Brian D. Berman
PSPhilip A. Starr
Philip A. Starr
JMJr. William J. Marks
Jr. William J. Marks
JOJill L. Ostrem
Jill L. Ostrem
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for idiopathic generalized dystonia. More recently, it has been applied as a treatment for focal and segmental dystonias. This patient population offers an opportunity to study the effects of alteration of pallidal outflow on previously normal limb function. Methods: We sought to retrospectively characterize the extent of novel GPi DBS-induced adverse motor effects in patients with adult-onset cervical and cranial-cervical dystonia using a questionnaire, and compared the findings to dystonia improvement as measured by standard scales. Results: Despite significant improvement in dystonia (65% in mean Burke-Fahn-MarsdenDystonia Rating Scale motor score, p < 0.005, and 59% in mean Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale score, p < 0.008), slowing and difficulty with normal motor function was reported in previously nondystonic extremities in 10 of 11 patients. Symptoms were common in both upper and lower extremities and included new difficulties with handwriting (82%), getting up from a chair or in/out of a car (73%), and walking (45%), and were not associated with aberrant lead placement near the internal capsule. Conclusion: Although GPi DBS was shown to be effective in these patients, the influence of GPi DBS on nondystonic body regions deserves further investigation.

1 April 2016 in Journal of Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JOJill L. Ostrem
Jill L. Ostrem
NZNathan Ziman
Nathan Ziman
NGNicholas B. Galifianakis
Nicholas B. Galifianakis
PSPhilip A. Starr
Philip A. Starr
MLMarta San Luciano
Marta San Luciano
PLPaul S. Larson
Paul S. Larson
OBJECT: The ClearPoint real-time interventional MRI-guided methodology for deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead placement may offer advantages to frame-based approaches and allow accurate implantation under general anesthesia. In this study, the authors assessed the safety and efficacy of DBS in Parkinson’s disease (PD) using this surgical method. METHODS: This was a prospective single-center study of bilateral DBS therapy in patients with advanced PD and motor fluctuations. Symptom severity was evaluated at baseline and 12 months postimplantation using the change in Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III “off” medication score as the primary outcome variable. RESULTS: Twenty-six PD patients (15 men and 11 women) were enrolled from 2010 to 2013. Twenty patients were followed for 12 months (16 with a subthalamic nucleus target and 4 with an internal globus pallidus target). The mean UPDRS Part III “off” medication score improved from 40.75 ± 10.9 to 24.35 ± 8.8 (p = 0.001). “On” medication time without troublesome dyskinesia increased 5.2 ± 2.6 hours per day (p = 0.0002). UPDRS Parts II and IV, total UPDRS score, and dyskinesia rating scale “on” medication scores also significantly improved (p < 0.01). The mean levodopa equivalent daily dose decreased from 1072.5 ± 392 mg to 828.25 ± 492 mg (p = 0.046). No significant cognitive or mood declines were observed. A single brain penetration was used for placement of all leads, and the mean targeting error was 0.6 ± 0.3 mm. There were 3 serious adverse events (1 DBS hardware-related infection, 1 lead fracture, and 1 unrelated death). CONCLUSIONS: DBS leads placed using the ClearPoint interventional real-time MRI-guided method resulted in highly accurate lead placement and outcomes comparable to those seen with frame-based approaches.

1 May 2016 in Neurobiology of Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DWDoris D. Wang
Doris D. Wang
CHCoralie de Hemptinne
Coralie de Hemptinne
SMSvjetlana Miocinovic
Svjetlana Miocinovic
SQSalman E. Qasim
Salman E. Qasim
AMAndrew M. Miller
Andrew M. Miller
PSPhilip A. Starr
Philip A. Starr