Christopher Owen

Prof. Christopher Owen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

41Years (1986-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 1995 in Archives of Oral Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RWR.J.C. Wilding
R.J.C. Wilding
JSJ.C.G. Slabbert
J.C.G. Slabbert
HKH. Kathree
H. Kathree
COChristopher Owen
Christopher Owen
KCK. Crombie
K. Crombie
PDP. Delport
P. Delport

1 July 1993 in The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YOY.I. Osman
Y.I. Osman
COChristopher Owen
Christopher Owen

1 March 1987 in Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RWR. J. C. Wilding
R. J. C. Wilding
COChristopher Owen
Christopher Owen

24 September 2004
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLeanne M Sykes
Leanne M Sykes
APAndrew M Parrott
Andrew M Parrott
COChristopher Owen
Christopher Owen
DSDonald R Snaddon
Donald R Snaddon

1 August 1986 in The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
COChristopher Owen
Christopher Owen

26 February 2016 in BDJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MPMrudula Patel
Mrudula Patel
JDJainisha Desai
Jainisha Desai
COChristopher Owen
Christopher Owen
Objectives/Aims: This in vitro laboratory study compared the efficacy of water, sodium percarbonate (SPC) and chlorine dioxide (ClO2) solutions in the disinfection of dental unit water lines (DUWLs). Materials and Methods: New DUWL tubes were cut, split open, and mono-culture and mixed-culture biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans were grown. Harvested biofilms from the sectioned DUWL tubes were exposed to sterile distilled water, SPC or 5 and 10 p.p.m. ClO2 in both a stationary phase and through a constant flow. Bacterial counts were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric rank test. Results: In the mono-culture biofilms, SPC, 5 and 10 p.p.m. ClO2 significantly reduced all the test organisms (P<0.01). However, no significant difference was found between SPC and ClO2. In the mixed-culture biofilms exposed to disinfectant without flow, ClO2 significantly reduced the biofilm (P=0.02) compared with water and SPC. Similarly, in the constant flow study, ClO2 proved to be superior to water. Conclusion: At low concentrations, ClO2 with and without flow significantly reduced the mixed-culture biofilm grown in vitro on the sections of the DUWL tubes. Therefore, it has the potential to be used in the patient treatment water, as it is potable at these concentrations, and to decontaminate and limit the biofilm formation in the water lines.