Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is an important complication that can be observed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Acute GvHD (aGvHD) is seen after alloHSCT and the incidence of aGvHD is around 30%-50%. aGvHD prophylaxis is essential in patients undergoing allo-HSCT. Initial therapy for aGvHD is steroids. Prognosis is poor in aGvHD patients not responding to steroids. In this article, the pathobiology, clinical findings, prophylaxis, and treatment of aGvHD will be summarized.

The validity of the three currently used chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) scoring systems (Sokal CML prognostic scoring system, Euro/Hasford CML scoring system, and the EUTOS CML prognostic scoring system) were compared in the CML patients receiving frontline imatinib mesylate. One hundred and fourty-three chronic phase CML patients (71 males, 72 females) taking imatinib as frontline treatment were included in the study. The median age was 44 (16-82) years. Median total and on-imatinib follow-up durations were 29 (3.8-130) months and 25 (3-125) months, respectively. The complete hematological response (CHR) rate at 3 months was 95%. The best cumulative complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate at 24 months was 79.6%. Euro/Hasford scoring system was well-correlated with both Sokal and EUTOS scores (r = 0.6, P < 0.001 and r = 0.455, P < 0.001). However, there was only a weak correlation between Sokal and EUTOS scores (r = 0.2, P = 0.03). The 5-year median estimated event-free survival for low and high EUTOS risk patients were 62.6 (25.7-99.5) and 15.3 (7.4-23.2) months, respectively (P < 0.001). This performance was better than Sokal (P = 0.3) and Euro/Hasford (P = 0.04) scoring systems. Overall survival and CCyR rates were also better predicted by the EUTOS score. EUTOS CML prognostic scoring system, which is the only prognostic system developed during the imatinib era, predicts European LeukemiaNet (ELN)-based event-free survival better than Euro/Hasford and Sokal systems in CML patients receiving frontline imatinib mesylate. This observation might have important clinical implications.

Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia is unsatisfactory in adults due to disease and patient-related factors and probably because adult chemotherapy regimens are weaker than pediatric protocols. Worries about inadequacy of adult regimens urged many hematologists, including us, to reconsider their routine treatment practices. In this retrospective multicenter study, we aimed to evaluate results of hyper-CVAD treatment in comparison to other intensive protocols. All patients aged ≤65 years who were commenced on intensive induction chemotherapy between 1999 and 2011 were included in the study. Sixty-eight of 166 patients received hyper-CVAD, 65 were treated with CALGB-8811 regimen and 33 with multiple other protocols. Limited number of patients who were treated with other intensive protocols and mature B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia cases who were mostly given hyper-CVAD were eliminated from the statistical analyses. In spite of a favorable complete remission rate (84.2%), overall (26.3 vs. 44.2% at 5 years, p = 0.05) and disease-free (24.9 vs. 48.2%, p = 0.001) survival rates were inferior with hyper-CVAD compared to CALGB-8811 due to higher cumulative nonrelapse mortality risk (29.7 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.003) and no superiority in cumulative relapse incidence comparison (45% for both arms, p = 0.44). Hyper-CVAD, in its original form, was a less favorable regimen in our practice.

There are contradictory reports about the prevalence of cholelithiasis in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The pathogenesis of gallstones is associated with the lithogenic changes of bile composition, increased tendency to nucleation, and decreased gallbladder motility. The studies related to these factors can predict the development of cholelithiasis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ultrasonic gallbladder function in CKD and to compare it in predialysis (PreD), hemodialysis (HD), and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. Age, gender, and body mass index matched 49 CKD patients (14 PreD, 19 HD, 16 CAPD), and 17 control individuals were included in the study. Diabetic and cirrhotic patients were not included. Ultrasonic gallbladder volume was evaluated in pre- and postprandial period, and ejection fraction was calculated. We also measured several biochemical parameters (cholesterol, triglyceride, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, calcium, Phosphorus, parathormone, albumin, total protein) in blood. Preprandial gallbladder volume in PreD, HD, CAPD, and control groups were 26.7 +/-13.6, 20.8+/-10.4, 23.2+/-14.7, and 26.4+/-14.8 mL, respectively (p > 0.05). Ejection fractions were 54.1 +/- 22.9%, 54.9 +/- 23.9%, 48.6 +/- 15.9%, and 51.8 +/- 19.2% in PreD, HD, CAPD, and control groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Serum triglyceride was higher in PreD patients than control group (207 +/- 144 vs. 110 +/-48 mg/dL) (p<0.05). Serum BUN, Cre, P, and PTH levels were higher in CKD groups than the control group, whereas serum total protein and albumin levels were higher in the control group (p<0.05). Serum Ca was lower in PreD and HD patients than in the controls (p<0.05). In conclusion, CKD and renal replacement therapy (HD and CAPD) do not affect gallbladder functions, but more studies are needed to evaluate prevalence of gallstones, gallbladder motility, and the composition of bile in CKD.