Tamara Boto

Dr. Tamara Boto


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2014 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TBTamara Boto
Tamara Boto
TLThierry Louis
Thierry Louis
KJKantiya Jindachomthong
Kantiya Jindachomthong
KJKees Jalink
Kees Jalink
STSeth M. Tomchik
Seth M. Tomchik

1 May 2019 in Cell Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TBTamara Boto
Tamara Boto
ASAaron Stahl
Aaron Stahl
XZXiaofan Zhang
Xiaofan Zhang
TLThierry Louis
Thierry Louis
STSeth M. Tomchik
Seth M. Tomchik
Dopaminergic neurons play a key role in encoding associative memories, but little is known about how these circuits modulate memory strength. Here we report that different sets of dopaminergic neurons projecting to the Drosophila mushroom body (MB) differentially regulate valence and memory strength. PPL2 neurons increase odor-evoked calcium responses to a paired odor in the MB and enhance behavioral memory strength when activated during olfactory classical conditioning. When paired with odor alone, they increase MB responses to the paired odor but do not drive behavioral approach or avoidance, suggesting that they increase the salience of the odor without encoding strong valence. This contrasts with the role of dopaminergic PPL1 neurons, which drive behavioral reinforcement but do not alter odor-evoked calcium responses in the MB when stimulated. These data suggest that different sets of dopaminergic neurons modulate olfactory valence and memory strength via independent actions on a memory-encoding brain region.

2 January 2020 in Journal of Neurogenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TBTamara Boto
Tamara Boto
ASAaron Stahl
Aaron Stahl
STSeth M. Tomchik
Seth M. Tomchik
Recent years have witnessed significant progress in understanding how memories are encoded, from the molecular to the cellular and the circuit/systems levels. With a good compromise between brain complexity and behavioral sophistication, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is one of the preeminent animal models of learning and memory. Here we review how memories are encoded in Drosophila, with a focus on short-term memory and an eye toward future directions. Forward genetic screens have revealed a large number of genes and transcripts necessary for learning and memory, some acting cell-autonomously. Further, the relative numerical simplicity of the fly brain has enabled the reverse engineering of learning circuits with remarkable precision, in some cases ascribing behavioral phenotypes to single neurons. Functional imaging and physiological studies have localized and parsed the plasticity that occurs during learning at some of the major loci. Connectomics projects are significantly expanding anatomical knowledge of the nervous system, filling out the roadmap for ongoing functional/physiological and behavioral studies, which are being accelerated by simultaneous tool development. These developments have provided unprecedented insight into the fundamental neural principles of learning, and lay the groundwork for deep understanding in the near future.

31 July 2013 in The Anatomical Record
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFernando Martín
Fernando Martín
TBTamara Boto
Tamara Boto
CGCarolina Gomez-Diaz
Carolina Gomez-Diaz
EAEsther Alcorta
Esther Alcorta
The olfactory system of Drosophila has become an attractive and simple model to investigate olfaction because it follows the same organizational principles of vertebrates, and the results can be directly applied to other insects with economic and sanitary relevance. Here, we review the structural elements of the Drosophila olfactory reception organs at the level of the cells and molecules involved. This article is intended to reflect the structural basis underlying the functional variability of the detection of an olfactory universe composed of thousands of odors. At the genetic level, we further detail the genes and transcription factors (TF) that determine the structural variability. The fly's olfactory receptor organs are the third antennal segments and the maxillary palps, which are covered with sensory hairs called sensilla. These sensilla house the odorant receptor neurons (ORNs) that express one or few odorant receptors in a stereotyped pattern regulated by combinations of TF. Also, perireceptor events, such as odor molecules transport to their receptors, are carried out by odorant binding proteins. In addition, the rapid odorant inactivation to preclude saturation of the system occurs by biotransformation and detoxification enzymes. These additional events take place in the lymph that surrounds the ORNs. We include some data on ionotropic and metabotropic olfactory transduction, although this issue is still under debate in Drosophila. Anat Rec, 296:1477‐1488, 2013.

1 October 2009 in Journal of Insect Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJacob Riveron
Jacob Riveron
TBTamara Boto
Tamara Boto
EAEsther Alcorta
Esther Alcorta

28 December 2017 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TLThierry Louis
Thierry Louis
ASAaron Stahl
Aaron Stahl
TBTamara Boto
Tamara Boto
STSeth M. Tomchik
Seth M. Tomchik
Significance: Cyclic AMP signaling is involved in learning across taxa, but how cAMP modulation drives coherent plasticity across circuits is unclear. Results of this study demonstrate that cAMP-dependent plasticity in the Drosophila brain drives olfactory learning-induced plasticity, which is biased toward appetitive conditioning and modulates motivated behavior.