Salvatore Alfieri

Dr. Salvatore Alfieri

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 May 2015 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FFFerrucci Francesco
Ferrucci Francesco
Sara GandiniSara Gandini
Sara Gandini
ABA Battaglia
A Battaglia
SASalvatore Alfieri
Salvatore Alfieri
AGA M Di Giacomo
A M Di Giacomo
CMC Martinoli
C Martinoli
Ipilimumab improves the survival of metastatic melanoma patients. Despite documented, durable objective responses, a significant number of patients fails to benefit from treatment. The aim of this study was to identify an upfront marker for treatment benefit. A total of 187 metastatic melanoma patients treated in three Italian Institutions with 3 mg kg−1 ipilimumab, and 27 patients treated with 10 mg kg−1 ipilimumab, were evaluated. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was calculated from pre-therapy full blood counts. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and multivariate Cox models were applied, adjusting for confounders and other prognostic factors. In the training cohort of 69 patients treated at European Institute of Oncology, pre-therapy NLR was identified as the strongest and independent marker for treatment benefit in multivariate analyses. Patients with baseline NLR<5 had a significantly improved PFS (HR=0.38; 95% CI: 0.22–0.66; P=0.0006) and OS (HR=0.24; 95% CI: 0.13–0.46; P<0.0001) compared with those with a NLR5. Associations of low NLR with improved survival were confirmed in three validation cohorts of patients. Our findings show that baseline NLR is strongly and independently associated with outcome of patients treated with ipilimumab, and may serve to identify patients most likely to benefit from this therapy.

1 February 2015 in Cancer Treatment Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Francesco MassariFrancesco Massari
Francesco Massari
MSMatteo Santoni
Matteo Santoni
CCC. Ciccarese
C. Ciccarese
SDSantini Daniele
Santini Daniele
SASalvatore Alfieri
Salvatore Alfieri
Giampaolo TortoraGiampaolo Tortora
Giampaolo Tortora

1 March 2017 in Oral Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SASalvatore Alfieri
Salvatore Alfieri
RGRoberta Granata
Roberta Granata
CBCristiana Bergamini
Cristiana Bergamini
CRCarlo Resteghini
Carlo Resteghini
PBPaolo Bossi
Paolo Bossi
LLLaura Locati
Laura Locati

1 December 2016 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLaura Locati
Laura Locati
MDMarcello Deraco
Marcello Deraco
BCB. Cortelazzi
B. Cortelazzi
CBCristiana Bergamini
Cristiana Bergamini
PBPaolo Bossi
Paolo Bossi
LLL. Licitra
L. Licitra

28 June 2017 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPaolo Bossi
Paolo Bossi
Diego CortinovisDiego Cortinovis
Diego Cortinovis
SFS. Fatigoni
S. Fatigoni
MRM. Cossu Rocca
M. Cossu Rocca
AFAlessandra Fabi
Alessandra Fabi
FRF. Roila
F. Roila
Background: The activity of ginger in the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) has been suggested, but design inadequacies, heterogeneity of the population, small numbers and poor quality of tested products limit the possibility to offer generalizable results. Patients and methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study in patients planned to receive ≥2 chemotherapy cycles with high dose (>50 mg/m2) cisplatin. Patients received ginger 160 mg/day (with standardized dose of bioactive compounds) or placebo in addition to the standard antiemetic prophylaxis for CINV, starting from the day after cisplatin administration. CINV was assessed through daily visual-analogue scale and Functional Living Index Emesis (FLIE) questionnaires. The main objective was protection from delayed nausea; secondary endpoints included intercycle nausea and nausea anticipatory symptoms. Results: In total, 121 patients received ginger and 123 placebo. Lung (49%) and head and neck cancer (HNC; 35%) were the most represented tumors. No differences were reported in terms of safety profile or compliance. The incidence of delayed, intercycle and anticipatory nausea did not differ between the 2 arms in the 1st cycle and 2nd cycle. A benefit of ginger over placebo in FLIE nausea score differences (day 6-day 1) was identified for females (P=0.048) and HNC patients (P=0.038) Conclusions: In patients treated with high dose cisplatin, the daily addition of ginger, even if safe, did not result in a protective effect on CINV. The favorable effect observed on nausea in subgroups at particular risk of nausea (females; HNC) deserves specific investigation.

1 June 2017 in Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CRCarlo Resteghini
Carlo Resteghini
SCStefano Cavalieri
Stefano Cavalieri
DGD. Galbiati
D. Galbiati
RGR. Granata
R. Granata
SASalvatore Alfieri
Salvatore Alfieri
LLLaura Locati
Laura Locati