BACKGROUND: Mood disorders have been described as the commonest psychiatric disorders in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Secondary depression in temporal lobe epilepsy could be interpreted either as an adjustment reaction to a chronic disease or as a limbic dysfunction. To clarify this issue, a controlled study of psychiatric disorders was conducted in different forms of epileptic and non-epileptic chronic conditions. METHODS: Twenty outpatients with temporal lobe epilepsy, 18 outpatients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy--a primary generalised seizure disorder--20 matched type I diabetic patients, and 20 matched normal controls were assessed by a structured interview (SADS) and by self rating scales (Beck depression inventory (BDI) and the state and trait anxiety scales STAIX1 and STAIX2). RESULTS: Sixteen (80%) patients with temporal lobe epilepsy fulfilled the criteria for a psychiatric diagnosis at the SADS interview with a significantly higher frequency than patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (22%) and diabetic patients (10%) (P < 0.0001). The most frequent disorder in temporal lobe epilepsy was a mood disorder: 11 (55%) patients with temporal lobe epilepsy had depression compared with three patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and two diabetic patients (P < 0.001). Eight patients with temporal lobe epilepsy with an affective disorder also had a comorbid personality or anxiety disorder. Patients with temporal lobe epilepsy scored significantly higher on BDI, STAIX1, and STAIX2 than the three control groups (P < 0.001, P < 0.01, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with temporal lobe epilepsy have a higher incidence of affective and personality disorders, often in comorbidity, than patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and diabetic patients suggesting that these psychiatric disorders are not an adjustment reaction to a chronic disease but rather reflect a limbic dysfunction.

Febrile seizures (FS) affect 5–12% of infants and children up to 6 years of age. There is now epidemiological evidence that FS are associated with subsequent afebrile and unprovoked seizures in ≈7% of patients, which is 10 times more than in the general population. Extensive genetic studies have demonstrated that various loci are responsible for familial FS, and the FEB3 autosomal-dominant locus has been identified on chromosome 2q23–24, where the SCN1A gene is mapped. However, gene mutations causing simple FS have not been found yet. Here we show that the M145T mutation of a well conserved amino acid in the first transmembrane segment of domain I of the human Na _v 1.1 channel α-subunit cosegregates in all 12 individuals of a large Italian family affected by simple FS. Functional studies in mammalian cells demonstrate that the mutation causes a 60% reduction of current density and a 10-mV positive shift of the activation curve. Thus, M145T is a loss-of-function mutant. These results show that monogenic FS should also be considered a channelopathy.

Summary: Purpose: The incidence of malformations among infants of mothers with epilepsy treated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during pregnancy is higher than that found in the general population. The aim of this study was to contribute to providing a definition of the rate of congenital anomalies in the offspring of mothers with epilepsy and to detect possible risk factors. Methods: Since 1977, 517 pregnancies were followed up at the San Paolo Hospital in Milan by a team of epileptologists and obstetricians. The patients received monthly obstetric and neurologic examinations, and the blood levels of AEDs were tested monthly. During pregnancy the patients underwent ultrasound investigations to evaluate fetal morphology and development. At the time of delivery, the infants were submitted to a standardized examination by a pediatrician, and a more detailed clinical examination was performed on day 5. Malformations were classified as (a) genetic and chromosomic, (b) severe and mild malformations, and (c) deformities. Results: The overall rate of malformations was 9.7%: of these, 5.3% were structurally severe, 2.2% were mild, 0.4% were chromosomic‐genetic, and 1.8% were deformities. No malformation was detected in the 25 untreated patients. Conclusions: The risks of teratogenicity have been regarded as multifactorial, involving such factors as genetic predisposition, although most prospective studies show that AED‐related factors are the primary risk factors for an increased incidence of congenital malformations.