Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the new reference standard in first-line HCC treatment, replacing tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as sorafenib. Many clinical trials with different combinations are already in development to validate novel immunotherapies for the treatment of patients with HCC. Adoptive cell therapy (ACT), also known as cellular immunotherapy, with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) or gene-modified T cells expressing novel T cell receptors (TCR) may represent a promising alternative approach to modify the immune system to recognize tumor cells with better clinical outcomes. In this review, we briefly discuss the overview of ACT as a promising treatment modality in HCC, along with recent updates of ongoing clinical trials.

Background: While the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma is rising, little is known about young‐onset disease. We compared clinical characteristics and outcomes between patients with young‐onset cholangiocarcinoma, diagnosed between the ages of 18 and <50 years, and patients with typical‐onset cholangiocarcinoma, diagnosed at age 50 years or greater.Methods: We used the National Cancer Database to identify patients with young‐onset cholangiocarcinoma (n = 2520) and typical‐onset cholangiocarcinoma (n = 23,826). We compared the frequency of demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups. We compared overall survival between the two groups using multivariable Cox regression analysis after adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, comorbidity, facility type, tumor location, tumor stage, surgical status, and receipt of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery.Results: When compared to patients with typical‐onset disease (median age 68 years), patients with young‐onset cholangiocarcinoma (median age 44 years) were more likely to be non‐White (35.0% vs. 27.4%, p < 0.01), and had lower overall comorbidity burden. Patients with young‐onset disease had a greater proportion of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (56.0% vs. 45.5%, p < 0.001) and stage IV disease (50.5% vs. 43.5%, p < 0.001). Younger patients were more likely than typical‐onset patients to receive definitive surgery (30.9% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.001), radiation (27.7% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.001) and chemotherapy (73.1% vs. 50.1%, p < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, patients with young‐onset disease had a 15% decreased risk of death, compared with patients with typical‐onset disease (HR 0.85 [95% CI 0.80–0.89], p < 0.001).Conclusions: Patients with young‐onset cholangiocarcinoma may represent a demographically and clinically distinct group from those with more typical‐onset disease.

Background: We aimed to study the effect of socioeconomic differences and molecular characteristics on survival in patients with young-onset pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (YOPNET) and typical-onset PNET (TOPNET). Methods: We identified the patients with YOPNET (<50 years) and TOPNET (≥50 years) who underwent definitive surgery diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 using the National Cancer Database. We evaluated overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods before and after propensity score matching. A publicly available genomic dataset was used to compare mutation frequencies among the two groups. Results: A total of 6259 patients with PNET were included, of which 27% were YOPNET. Patients with YOPNET were more likely to be Black, Hispanic, female, and have private insurance versus patients with TOPNET (all p < 0.001). Patients with YOPNET had a lower comorbidity score, but higher stage and tumor size (all p < 0.001). YOPNET was associated with a greater improved OS than TOPNET before and after propensity score matching (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, this survival difference persisted for YOPNET as an independent prognostic factor (unmatched p = 0.008; matched p = 0.01). For genomic analysis, patients with YOPNET had a lower rate of multiple endocrine neoplasia type-1 (MEN-1) mutation than patients with TOPNET (26% vs. 56%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: YOPNET represents a disease with distinct clinical features. Patients with YOPNET who underwent definitive surgery had better OS than patients with TOPNET despite having higher stage and tumor size. YOPNET also had lower rate of MEN-1 mutation.

Background: The age-dependent prognostic impact of KRAS status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is unknown. Materials & Methods: We used the National Cancer Database to evaluate the survival ...

Race and ethnic backgrounds affect the disease characteristics and clinical outcomes in many cancers, including acute myeloid leukemia; however, the association of race/ethnicity on myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is still controversial. Therefore, we aimed to study the impact of race/ethnicity on the disease characteristics and survival outcomes in patients with MDS. Adult patients with MDS diagnosed in 2004–2016 were selected using the SEER database. Race/ethnicity was categorized as non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and Hispanic. Hispanic and NHB patients had significantly lower incidence rate ratio (IRR) in age group ≥01 years (p < .001) compared to NHW; however, in the age group <50 years, NHB patients had significantly higher IRR with an increased incidence rate of 49%. NHB patients had better overall survival than Hispanic and NHW patients (p < .001), even after adjusting for confounding variables. MDS have significant differences in age at diagnosis, disease risk, and survival outcomes based on racial/ethnic backgrounds.

Background: We studied the effect of race and ethnicity on disease characteristics and survival in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to select patients with non-pancreatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. Trends in survival were evaluated among three groups: Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, and non-Hispanic Black. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods were performed to calculate overall survival and cause-specific survival after adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics. Results: A total of 26,399 patients were included in the study: 65.1% were non-Hispanic White, 19.9% were non-Hispanic Black, and 15% were Hispanic. Non-Hispanic White patients were more likely to be male (50.0%, p < 0.001), older than 60 years (48.0%, p < 0.001), and present with metastatic disease (17.7%, p < 0.001). Non-Hispanic White patients had small intestine neuroendocrine tumors, while Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black patients had rectum neuroendocrine tumors as the most common primary site. Hispanic patients had better overall survival, while non-Hispanic Black patients had better cause-specific survival versus non-Hispanic White patients. This finding was confirmed on multivariable analysis where Hispanic patients had improved overall survival compared to non-Hispanic White patients (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.89 (0.81–0.97)), whereas non-Hispanic Black patients had better cause-specific survival compared to non-Hispanic White patients (HR: 0.89 (0.80–0.98)). Conclusions: Race/ethnicity is an independent prognostic factor in patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.