Tyron Louw

Dr. Tyron Louw

Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2017 in Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRuth Madigan
Ruth Madigan
TLTyron Louw
Tyron Louw
MWMarc Wilbrink
Marc Wilbrink
ASAnna Schieben
Anna Schieben
NMNatasha Merat
Natasha Merat
The main aim of this study was to use an adapted version of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) to investigate the factors that influence users’ acceptance of automated road transport systems (ARTS). A questionnaire survey was administered to 315 users of a CityMobil2 ARTS demonstration in the city of Trikala, Greece. Results provide evidence of the usefulness of the UTAUT framework for increasing our understanding of how public acceptance of these automated vehicles might be maximised. Hedonic Motivation, or users’ enjoyment of the system, had a strong impact on Behavioural Intentions to use ARTS in the future, with Performance Expectancy, Social Influence and Facilitating Conditions also having significant effects. The anticipated effect of Effort Expectancy did not emerge from this study, suggesting that the level of effort required is unlikely to be a critical factor in consumers’ decisions about using ARTS. Based on these results, a number of modifications to UTAUT are suggested for future applications in the context of automated transport. It is recommended that designers and developers should consider the above issues when implementing more permanent versions of automated public transport.

15 September 2018 in Cognition, Technology & Work
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNatasha Merat
Natasha Merat
BSBobbie Seppelt
Bobbie Seppelt
TLTyron Louw
Tyron Louw
JEJohan Engström
Johan Engström
JLJohn D. Lee
John D. Lee
AKAndreas Keinath
Andreas Keinath
Despite an abundant use of the term “Out of the loop” (OOTL) in the context of automated driving and human factors research, there is currently a lack of consensus on its precise definition, how it can be measured, and the practical implications of being in or out of the loop during automated driving. The main objective of this paper is to consider the above issues, with the goal of achieving a shared understanding of the OOTL concept between academics and practitioners. To this end, the paper reviews existing definitions of OOTL and outlines a set of concepts, which, based on the human factors and driver behaviour literature, could serve as the basis for a commonly-agreed definition. Following a series of working group meetings between representatives from academia, research institutions and industrial partners across Europe, North America, and Japan, we suggest a precise definition of being in, out, and on the loop in the driving context. These definitions are linked directly to whether or not the driver is in physical control of the vehicle, and also the degree of situation monitoring required and afforded by the driver. A consideration of how this definition can be operationalized and measured in empirical studies is then provided, and the paper concludes with a short overview of the implications of this definition for the development of automated driving functions.

15 September 2018 in Cognition, Technology & Work
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAnna Schieben
Anna Schieben
MWMarc Wilbrink
Marc Wilbrink
CKCarmen Kettwich
Carmen Kettwich
RMRuth Madigan
Ruth Madigan
TLTyron Louw
Tyron Louw
NMNatasha Merat
Natasha Merat

1 January 2016 in Transportation Research Procedia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRuth Madigan
Ruth Madigan
TLTyron Louw
Tyron Louw
MDMarc Dziennus
Marc Dziennus
TGTatiana Graindorge
Tatiana Graindorge
EOErik Ortega
Erik Ortega
NMNatasha Merat
Natasha Merat
As research into innovative forms of automated transportation systems gains momentum, it is important that we develop an understanding of the factors that will impact the adoption of these systems. In an effort to address this issue, the European project CityMobil2 is collecting data around large-scale demonstrations of Automated Road Transport Systems (ARTS) in a number of cities across Europe. For these systems to be successful, user acceptance is vital. The current study used the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) to investigate the factors which might influence acceptance of ARTS vehicles, which were operational in two locations in Europe. The results indicate that the UTAUT constructs of performance expectancy, effort expectancy and social influence were all useful predictors of behavioural intentions to use ARTS, with performance expectancy having the strongest impact. However, it would appear that other factors are also needed in order for the model to strongly predict behavioural intentions in an automated transport context. Based on these findings, a number of implications for developers and ideas for future research are suggested

1 October 2020 in Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SNSina Nordhoff
Sina Nordhoff
TLTyron Louw
Tyron Louw
SISatu Innamaa
Satu Innamaa
ELEsko Lehtonen
Esko Lehtonen
ABAnja Beuster
Anja Beuster
NMNatasha Merat
Natasha Merat

1 March 2017 in Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TLTyron Louw
Tyron Louw
NMNatasha Merat
Natasha Merat