Andrew Patt

Mr. Andrew Patt


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 December 2019 in BMC Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TETara Eicher
Tara Eicher
APAndrew Patt
Andrew Patt
EKEsko Kautto
Esko Kautto
RMRaghu Machiraju
Raghu Machiraju
Ewy MathéEwy Mathé
Ewy Mathé
YZYan Zhang
Yan Zhang
Background: Proteomic measurements, which closely reflect phenotypes, provide insights into gene expression regulations and mechanisms underlying altered phenotypes. Further, integration of data on proteome and transcriptome levels can validate gene signatures associated with a phenotype. However, proteomic data is not as abundant as genomic data, and it is thus beneficial to use genomic features to predict protein abundances when matching proteomic samples or measurements within samples are lacking. Results: We evaluate and compare four data-driven models for prediction of proteomic data from mRNA measured in breast and ovarian cancers using the 2017 DREAM Proteogenomics Challenge data. Our results show that Bayesian network, random forests, LASSO, and fuzzy logic approaches can predict protein abundance levels with median ground truth-predicted correlation values between 0.2 and 0.5. However, the most accurately predicted proteins differ considerably between approaches. Conclusions: In addition to benchmarking aforementioned machine learning approaches for predicting protein levels from transcript levels, we discuss challenges and potential solutions in state-of-the-art proteogenomic analyses.

4 August 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAndrew Patt
Andrew Patt
BDBryce Demoret
Bryce Demoret
CSColin Stets
Colin Stets
KBKate-Lynn Bill
Kate-Lynn Bill
PSPhilip Smith
Philip Smith
Ewy MathéEwy Mathé
Ewy Mathé
Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is an aggressive mesenchymal cancer marked by amplification of MDM2, an inhibitor of the tumor suppressor TP53. DDLPS patients with higher MDM2 amplification have lower chemotherapy sensitivity and worse outcome than patients with lower MDM2 amplification. We hypothesized that MDM2 amplification levels may be associated with changes in DDLPS metabolism. Six patient-derived DDLPS cell line models were subject to comprehensive metabolomic (Metabolon) and lipidomic (SCIEX 5600 TripleTOF-MS) profiling to assess associations with MDM2 amplification and their responses to metabolic perturbations. Comparing metabolomic profiles between MDM2 higher and lower amplification cells yielded a total of 17 differentially abundant metabolites across both panels (FDR < 0.05, log2 fold change < 0.75), including ceramides, glycosylated ceramides, and sphingomyelins. Disruption of lipid metabolism through statin administration resulted in a chemo-sensitive phenotype in MDM2 lower cell lines only, suggesting that lipid metabolism may be a large contributor to the more aggressive nature of MDM2 higher DDLPS tumors. This study is the first to provide comprehensive metabolomic and lipidomic characterization of DDLPS cell lines and provides evidence for MDM2-dependent differential molecular mechanisms that are critical factors in chemoresistance and could thus affect patient outcome.